/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 96 A friend claims he can predict h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A friend claims he can predict how a six-sided die will land. The parameter, \(p\), is the long-run likelihood of success, and the null hypothesis is that the friend is guessing. a. Pick the correct null hypothesis. i. \(p=1 / 6\) ii. \(p>1 / 6\) iii. \(p<1 / 6\) iv. \(p>1 / 2\) b. Which hypothesis best fits the friend's claim? (This is the alternative hypothesis.) i. \(p=1 / 6\) ii. \(p>1 / 6\) iii. \(p<1 / 6\) iv. \(p>1 / 2\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The correct null hypothesis is \(p = 1 / 6\). b. The hypothesis that best fits the friend's claim, the alternative hypothesis, is \(p > 1 / 6\).

Step by step solution

01

Identify the null hypothesis

The null hypothesis is a general statement or default position that there is no relationship between two measured phenomena, in this case, a successful prediction and guessing. Since the exercise states that the friend may only be guessing, the chance of correctly predicting the outcome of six-sided die roll as \(1 / 6\). Therefore the correct null hypothesis is \(p = 1 / 6\).
02

Identify the alternative hypothesis

Next, identify the alternative hypothesis that would best fit the friend's claim. As per the given description, if the friend can indeed predict the die's outcome better than random guessing, the chance of a successful prediction would definitely be more than \(1 / 6\). Therefore, the correct alternative hypothesis for the friend's claim would be \(p > 1 / 6\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Alternative Hypothesis
When conducting an experiment or testing a theory, researchers use the alternative hypothesis to indicate the exact opposite of what the null hypothesis asserts. In essence, while the null hypothesis suggests no change or no effect, the alternative hypothesis is the researcher's actual theory that there is an effect, or that there are changes to observe.

In the given exercise about the friend's ability to predict a die roll, the null hypothesis suggests that the friend has no special predictive power, and the probability of a correct prediction is \(1/6\), identical to random guessing. In contrast, the alternative hypothesis, which we are trying to prove through the test, posits that the friend can indeed predict better than random chance, which would yield a probability greater than \(1/6\). This represents the friend's alleged predictive ability. It's crucial to establish a clear alternative hypothesis as it drives the direction of the entire hypothesis test and affects the interpretation of the results.
Probability
The concept of probability is fundamental when discussing hypotheses in statistics. Probability, expressed as a number between 0 and 1, quantifies the likelihood of an event happening. A probability of 0 means that the event is impossible, while a probability of 1 means that the event is certain.

In hypothesis testing, probability helps us make decisions about the hypotheses. When referring to the friend's claim of predicting a die's outcome, a probability of \(1/6\) represents the chance of correctly guessing the roll of a fair six-sided die, since there are six possible outcomes and assuming that each is equally likely. The goal of hypothesis testing is to determine whether the actual data supports the null hypothesis or if there's enough evidence to suggest that the alternative hypothesis might be true.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a method used to make decisions about a population based on a sample. The process begins with the formation of two opposing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (often denoted as \(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (denoted as \(H_a\) or \(H_1\)). The null hypothesis usually represents a skeptical perspective or status quo, whereas the alternative hypothesis represents what the researcher wants to prove.

To determine which hypothesis is more likely to be true, researchers collect data and calculate a test statistic, which measures how extreme the observed results are. Using this statistic, they find the p-value, the probability of observing the test results if the null hypothesis were true. If the p-value is less than a given significance level, typically 0.05, the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis. It's essential to understand this process because it helps us quantify the evidence against the null hypothesis and thus, avoid making conclusions based merely on random variations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Historically (from about 2001 to 2014 ), \(57 \%\) of Americans believed that global warming is caused by human activities. A March 2017 Gallup poll of a random sample of 1018 Americans found that 692 believed that global warming is caused by human activities. a. What percentage of the sample believed global warming was caused by human activities? b. Test the hypothesis that the proportion of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical value of \(57 \%\). Use a significance level of \(0.01\). c. Choose the correct interpretation: i. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities is not significantly different from \(57 \%\). ii. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical level of \(57 \%\).

Butter Taste Test A student is tested to determine whether she can tell butter from margarine. She is blindfolded and given small bites of toast that has been spread with either butter or margarine that have been randomly chosen. The experiment is designed so that she will have exactly 15 bites with butter and 15 bites with margarine. She gets 20 right out of 30 trials. Can she tell butter from margarine at a \(0.05\) level of significance? Explain.

Refer to Exercise \(8.97 .\) Suppose 14 out of 20 voters in Pennsylvania report having voted for an independent candidate. The null hypothesis is that the population proportion is \(0.50 .\) What value of the test statistic should you report?

A researcher studying extrasensory perception (ESP) tests 300 students. Each student is asked to predict the outcome of a large number of coin flips. For each student, a hypothesis test using a \(5 \%\) significance level is performed. If the \(\mathrm{p}\) -value is less than or equal to \(0.05\), the researcher concludes that the student has ESP. Assuming that none of the 300 students actually have ESP, about how many would you expect the researcher to conclude do have ESP? Explain.

The null hypothesis on true/false tests is that the student is guessing, and the proportion of right answers is \(0.50 .\) A student taking a five-question true/false quiz gets 4 right out of 5 . She says that this shows that she knows the material, because the one-tailed p-value from the one-proportion \(z\) -test is \(0.090\), and she is using a significance level of \(0.10 .\) What is wrong with her approach?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.