/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 37 Historically (from about 2001 to... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Historically (from about 2001 to 2014 ), \(57 \%\) of Americans believed that global warming is caused by human activities. A March 2017 Gallup poll of a random sample of 1018 Americans found that 692 believed that global warming is caused by human activities. a. What percentage of the sample believed global warming was caused by human activities? b. Test the hypothesis that the proportion of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical value of \(57 \%\). Use a significance level of \(0.01\). c. Choose the correct interpretation: i. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities is not significantly different from \(57 \%\). ii. In 2017 , the percentage of Americans who believe global warming is caused by human activities has changed from the historical level of \(57 \%\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The percentage of Americans in 2017 who believe global warming is caused by human activities in the sample was \(68% \). After conducting the hypothesis test, we can choose either of the interpretations depending on whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the sample percentage

In order to calculate the sample percentage, the number of Americans who believed in 2017 that global warming is caused by human activity should be divided by the total number of the 2017 sample and multiplied by 100. This gives the percentage of the 2017 sample that supports this belief. So the calculation is as follows: \((692 / 1018) * 100 = 68 \%\)
02

Set up the null and alternative hypotheses

To test whether the belief has changed from the historical value, there is a need to set up the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H0) represents the current status quo or the belief that there has been no change in the proportion. The alternative hypothesis (H1) suggests that there has been a change. Thus: H0: p = 0.57, H1: p ≠ 0.57.
03

Conduct the hypothesis test

First, the z-score is calculated. The z-score is equal to the difference between the sample proportion (p̂) and the hypothesized proportion (p0) divided by the standard error of the sampling distribution of p̂. The formulation is as follows: z = (p̂ - p0) / sqrt((p0 * (1 - p0)) / n), where n is the sample size. After the z score is found, the p-value must be calculated. The p-value is the probability that you would have found the current result, or a more significant result, by chance if the null hypothesis were true. Here, we must calculate a two-tailed p-value because the alternative hypothesis was two-sided. By using a Z-table or calculator, the p-value corresponding to the z-score can be found. Then this p-value is compared with the significance level to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis.
04

Interpret the result

Once the p-value is calculated, it needs to be compared with the significance level (α) to make a decision. If the p-value smaller than α (0.01), we reject H0, otherwise fail to reject H0. Then based on the decision made, choice i or ii should be chosen.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion Hypothesis Test
A Proportion Hypothesis Test helps us determine if there's a significant difference between an observed sample proportion and a known or hypothesized population proportion.
In our present exercise, we're comparing a sample from 2017 against a historical belief from 2001 to 2014, which was that 57% of Americans thought global warming was driven by human activities.
To conduct this type of hypothesis test, we first need to find out what proportion of the sample shares this belief. That's where calculations come in, giving us clarity about whether our sample supports or refutes the established norm.
  • The calculation involves dividing the number of individuals who hold a belief by the total sample size and then converting this into a percentage.
This exercise confirms the sample percentage from the data given before proceeding to test the hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by alpha (\(\alpha\)), quantifies the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In essence, it's the risk we are willing to take for making an incorrect decision.
For this hypothesis test, the significance level is set at 0.01, meaning we accept a 1% chance of mistakenly claiming a difference in beliefs about global warming when there is none.
This strict threshold implies stronger evidence is needed to reject the null hypothesis, protecting us against making premature conclusions based on random sample variations.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
Setting up the null and alternative hypotheses is a fundamental step in hypothesis testing.
In the context of our exercise:
  • The Null Hypothesis (H0) is the presumption of no change from the historical proportion, expressed as \( p = 0.57 \).
  • The Alternative Hypothesis (H1) suggests a difference, articulating this as \( p eq 0.57 \) to allow for both an increase or decrease.
With these hypotheses established, we can proceed confidently into statistical testing. The null hypothesis serves as the baseline or default position, while the alternative seeks to prove deviation from it.
Z-Score Calculation
In the world of hypothesis testing, the Z-Score acts as a bridge to understanding where our sample stands in relation to the null hypothesis.
It quantifies the number of standard deviations our sample proportion \( \hat{p} \) lies from the hypothesized population proportion \( p_0 \).
To calculate this:
  • Compute the standard error using the formula \( \sqrt{\frac{p_0 \times (1 - p_0)}{n}} \).
  • Substitute the values into the Z-Score formula: \( Z = \frac{\hat{p} - p_0}{\text{Standard Error}} \).
This score allows us to derive the p-value and ultimately make our hypothesis decision.
The magnitude of the Z-Score lets us know how probable our sample proportion is under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When, in a criminal court, a defendant is found "not guilty," is the court saying with certainty that he or she is innocent? Explain.

According to a 2017 AAA survey, \(35 \%\) of Americans planned to take a family vacation (a vacation more than 50 miles from home involving two or more immediate family members. Suppose a recent survey of 300 Americans found that 115 planned on taking a family vacation. Carry out the first two steps of a hypothesis test to determine if the proportion of Americans planning a family vacation has changed. Explain how you would fill in the required entries in the figure for # of success, # of observations, and the value in \(\mathrm{H}_{0}\).

If we reject the null hypothesis, can we claim to have proved that the null hypothesis is false? Why or why not?

A true/false test has 50 questions. Suppose a passing grade is 35 or more correct answers. Test the claim that a student knows more than half of the answers and is not just guessing. Assume the student gets 35 answers correct out of \(50 .\) Use a significance level of \(0.05 .\) Steps 1 and 2 of a hypothesis test procedure are given. Show steps 3 and 4, and be sure to write a clear conclusion. $$ \text { Step 1: } \begin{aligned} &\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.50 \\ &\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{a}}: p>0.50 \end{aligned} $$ Step 2: Choose the one-proportion z-test. Sample size is large enough, because \(n p_{0}\) is \(50(0.5)=25\) and \(n\left(1-p_{0}\right)=50(0.50)=25\), and both are more than \(10 .\) Assume the sample is random and \(\alpha=0.05\).

Freedom of Religion A Gallup poll asked college students in 2016 and again in 2017 whether they believed the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of religion was secure or threatened in the country today. In 2016,2089 out of 3072 students surveyed said that freedom of religion was secure or very secure. In 2017,1929 out of 3014 students felt this way. a. Determine whether the proportion of college students who believe that freedom of religion is secure or very secure in this country has changed from 2016 . Use a significance level of \(0.05\). b. Use the sample data to construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in the proportions of college students in 2016 and 2017 who felt freedom of religion was secure or very secure. How does your confidence interval support your hypothesis test conclusion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.