/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 16 Literacy Rates World literacy ra... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Literacy Rates World literacy rates for individuals of 15 years of age or older are given in the data table as a percentage. Give two reasons why a chi- square test is not appropriate for this set of data.

Short Answer

Expert verified
A Chi-square test is not appropriate for the given data primarily for two reasons: 1) It is quantitative data (literacy rates measured in percentages) while Chi-square tests are appropriate for qualitative or categorical data. 2) Literacy rates are continuous data with infinite possibilities, while a Chi-square test is suited for discrete data.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Chi-square Test

A Chi-square (χ2) test is a statistical procedure that is used to determine whether there is a significant association between two categorical variables in a sample. It requires a frequency data that is obtained from two or more categories, and is often used to analyze the outcomes of experiments.
02

Identifying Data Type

In this case, the given data consists of world literacy rates, which are expressed as percentages. This type of data is referred to as ratio data, which is numerical and provides a true zero point, in this case a literacy rate of 0%. Ratio data is measured along a quantitative scale.
03

Reason 1: Invalid Data Type

The first reason that a chi-square test is not appropriate is that this test is used for categorical, not numerical data. Literacy rates are numbers (percentages) and hence are measured on a quantitative scale, while chi-square tests are for qualitative categories like colors, brands, political parties, etc.
04

Reason 2: Continuous vs. Discrete Data

The second reason a Chi-square test would not be suitable for literacy rates data is that it’s used for discrete data, not continuous data. Literacy rates are percentages which means they are continuous data and they have infinite possibilities, unlike categorical data which are classified into distinct categories.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Literacy rates
Literacy rates provide important insights into the educational levels of populations across different regions of the world. These rates are generally expressed as the percentage of people aged 15 and above who can read and write. It's quite an informative metric when evaluating the development stage of a country, related to economic growth and social progress.
For example, a higher literacy rate often correlates with better job opportunities and living standards.
However, when using literacy rates in statistical analyses, we must recognize their properties as numerical data. They are best suited for methods that handle continuous data, unlike the Chi-square test that is meant for categorical data. Understanding the nature of literacy rates helps choose the appropriate statistical methods, ensuring that we draw correct and meaningful conclusions.
Ratio data
Ratio data is a type of numerical data that allows for both absolute and relative comparison. It is the most informative form of data as it gives detailed insights due to having a true zero point, meaning that zero indicates the absence of the property being measured.
Think of it like a distance: zero means no distance, and values can infinitely vary from there.
Some key characteristics of ratio data include:
  • Quantifiability: Ratio data can be measured and compared in numerous ways, such as calculating percentages or averages.
  • True Zero: There is a point of origin, meaning zero represents a complete absence of the variable in question, like a 0% literacy rate.
  • Consistency: The intervals between data points are consistent and can be added, subtracted, divided, or multiplied.
In statistical analysis, understanding ratio data is critical for selecting appropriate tools and techniques, like t-tests or ANOVA, rather than the Chi-square test which is unsuitable for this data type.
Categorical vs. numerical data
Data can generally be classified into two types: categorical and numerical. Understanding the differences between these types is essential for choosing the right statistical methods.
Categorical data involves labels or names given to categories (for example, yes/no responses, types of animals, or names of brands). It is discrete and does not bear mathematical meaning, only patterns of frequency can be studied using tests like Chi-square.
On the other hand, numerical data is all about numbers and can be further divided into discrete and continuous data:
  • Discrete Data: Such as the number of students in a class.
  • Continuous Data: Like literacy rates; these can have infinite possibilities and decimal points.
When analyzing data, it’s crucial to identify the type of data at hand to ensure you use the most effective statistical tool. While numerical data requires methods that calculate means or standard deviations, categorical data fits categorical methods such as Chi-square testing.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Removal of Healthy Appendixes Computed tomography (CT) scans are used to diagnose the need for the removal of the appendix. CT scans give the patient a large level of radiation, which has risks, especially for young people. There is a new form of \(\mathrm{CT}\) scanning called low-dose CT, which was tested to see whether it was inferior when diagnosing appendicitis. Negative appendectomies are appendectomies that were done even though the appendix was healthy. The negative appendectomy rate was 6 of 172 patients randomly assigned to the low-dose \(C T\) and 6 out of 186 patients randomly assigned to the standard-dose group. a. Find the negative appendectomy rates for both samples and compare them. b. Test the hypothesis that the negative appendectomy rate and dosage are independent at the \(0.05\) level.

Design with Calcium Refer to Exercise \(10.42 .\) How could you find out whether calcium caused the lower death rates associated in this study with its use? Describe the design of a study assuming you had 300 women to work with. Assume that you do. not have to study the women for 19 years but, rather, will look at them for a much shorter time period, such as one or two years.

Tight Control of Blood Sugar "Tight glycemic control" means that the blood sugar is kept within a narrow range. Read the abstract below, and then answer the questions that follow it. "Methods: In this two-center, prospective, randomized trial, we enrolled 980 children, 0 to 36 months of age, undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were randomly assigned to either tight glycemic control ... targeting a blood glucose level of 80 to \(110 \mathrm{mg}\) per deciliter \(\ldots\) or standard care in the cardiac intensive care unit. Results: A total of 444 of the 490 children assigned to tight glycemic control ( \(91 \%\) ) received insulin versus 9 of 490 children assigned to standard care \((2 \%) \ldots\) [T]ight glycemic control was not associated with a significantly decreased rate of health careassociated infections \((8.6\) vs. \(9.9\) per 1000 patient-days, \(\mathrm{P}=0.67\) ). Conclusions: Tight glycemic control can be achieved with a low hypoglycemia rate after cardiac surgery in children, but it does not significantly change the infection rate \(\ldots .\) as compared with standard care." a. Identify the treatment variable and the response variable. b. Was this a controlled experiment or an observational study? Explain. c. What does the p-value show? d. Can you conclude that the use of tight glycemic control affects the rate of infections? Why or why not?

Alumni Donations The alumni office wishes to determine whether students who attend a reception with alumni just before graduation are more likely to donate money within the next two years. a. Describe a study based on a sample of students that would allow the alumni office to conclude that attending the reception causes future donations but that it is not possible to generalize this result to all students. b. Describe a study based on a sample of students that does not allow fundraisers to conclude that attending receptions causes future donations but does allow them to generalize to all students. c. Describe a study based on a sample of students that allows fundraisers to conclude that attending the reception causes future donations and also allows them to generalize to all students.

Hospital Rooms When patients are admitted to hospitals, they are sometimes assigned to a single room with one bed and sometimes assigned to a double room, with a roommate. (Some insurance companies will pay only for the less expensive, double rooms.) A researcher was interested in the effect of the type of room on the length of stay in the hospital. Assume that we are not dealing with health issues that require single rooms. Suppose that upon admission to the hospital, the names of patients who would have been assigned a double room were put onto a list and a systematic random sample was taken; every tenth patient who would have been assigned to a double room was part of the experiment. For each participant, a coin was flipped: If it landed heads up, she or he got a double room, and if it landed tails up, a single room. Then the experimenters observed how many days the patients stayed in the hospital and compared the two groups. The experiment ran for two months. Suppose those who stayed in single rooms stayed (on average) one less day, and suppose the difference was significant. a. Can you generalize to others from this experiment? If so, to whom can you generalize, and why can you do it? b. Can you infer causality from this study? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.