/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 Job-costing spoilage and scrap. ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Job-costing spoilage and scrap. MetalWorks, Inc., manufactures various metal parts in batches as ordered by customers, and accounts for them using job costing. Job 2346-8, a large job for customer X incurred \(\$ 240,000\) of direct materials costs and \(\$ 620,000\) of direct labor costs. MetalWorks applies overhead at a rate of 150\% of direct labor cost. MetalWorks quoted customer X a fixxed price for the job of \(\$ 2,000,000\) The job consisted of 90,000 good units and 10,000 spoiled units with no rework or disposal value. The job also created 200 pounds of scrap which can be sold for \$3 per pound. 1\. Calculate the gross margin MetalWorks will earn for this job, assuming the scrap sale is treated as material, and. a. all spoilage is considered abnormal. b. normal spoilage is \(8 \%\) of good units. c. normal spoilage is \(12 \%\) of good units. 2\. How would your answer to number 1 differ i f the scrap sale is treated as immaterial?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Gross margin is \$210,600 with material scrap sale. Immaterial sale lowers it to \$210,000.

Step by step solution

01

Calculate Overhead Costs

The overhead is calculated as 150% of direct labor costs. Given the direct labor costs for Job 2346-8 are \( \\(620,000 \), the overhead costs are calculated as follows: \[\text{Overhead} = 1.5 \times \\)620,000 = \$930,000.\]
02

Compute Total Job Costs

Total job costs include direct materials, direct labor, and overhead. We sum these values:\[\text{Total Job Cost} = \\(240,000 + \\)620,000 + \\(930,000 = \\)1,790,000.\]
03

Calculate Revenue from Scrap Sale

The job created 200 pounds of scrap, which can be sold for \( \\(3 \) per pound. Thus, the revenue from the scrap sale is:\[\text{Scrap Revenue} = 200 \times \\)3 = \$600.\]
04

Case a - All Spoilage Abnormal

When all spoilage is considered abnormal, we do not include it in the cost of goods sold; the cost for spoilage is absorbed by the job based on its actual occurrence. Therefore, the total job cost remains \( \\(1,790,000 \) as calculated earlier, and the scrap sale reduces this total cost:\[\text{Net Job Cost with Scrap} = \\)1,790,000 - \\(600 = \\)1,789,400.\]
05

Calculate Gross Margin for Case a

Here, the gross margin is the difference between the fixed price quoted and the net job cost with scrap:\[\text{Gross Margin for Case a} = \\(2,000,000 - \\)1,789,400 = \$210,600.\]
06

Case b - Normal Spoilage as 8% of Good Units

Calculate normal spoilage units:\[\text{Normal Spoilage} = 0.08 \times 90,000 = 7,200 \text{ units}.\]The cost for normal spoilage is not considered separately, so the cost of the job remains \( \$1,790,000 \). Abnormal spoilage is:\[\text{Abnormal Spoilage} = 10,000 - 7,200 = 2,800 \text{ units}.\]The scrap sale reduces the total cost as previously calculated.
07

Calculate Gross Margin for Case b

Since normal spoilage does not affect the cost, the gross margin remains unchanged from case a:\[\text{Gross Margin for Case b} = \\(2,000,000 - (\text{Total Job Cost adjusted for scrap}) = \\)210,600.\]
08

Case c - Normal Spoilage as 12% of Good Units

Calculate normal spoilage units:\[\text{Normal Spoilage} = 0.12 \times 90,000 = 10,800 \text{ units}.\]All the spoiled units (10,000) are less than the normal spoilage expected, so they are included in the cost of the job without additional charge. The scrap sale reduces the total cost as previously calculated.
09

Calculate Gross Margin for Case c

The entire spoilage is considered normal:\[\text{Gross Margin for Case c} = \\(2,000,000 - \\)1,789,400 = \$210,600.\]
10

Impact of Immaterial Scrap Sale

If the scrap sale is treated as immaterial, the revenue from the scrap sale would not be deducted from the job cost. Thus, it would not reduce the job costs and the gross margin in each of the scenarios "a", "b", and "c" would be \( \\(600 \) lower than calculated.The gross margin in each case would be \( \\)210,000 \).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Spoilage
Spoilage refers to units that are produced but do not meet quality standards and cannot be sold at full value. In job costing, spoilage can be classified into two types: normal spoilage and abnormal spoilage.
Normal spoilage is unavoidable in the production process and is typically expected within certain limits. It's accounted for as part of the cost of production. For example, if a company anticipates that 8% of the units in a batch might be spoiled, this is calculated into the cost.
Abnormal spoilage, however, exceeds the expected limits. It's considered unusual and not planned for. When spoilage is categorized as abnormal, companies often do not include these costs in standard production costs but account for them separately. This clear distinction helps in understanding where additional direct materials or labor might be needed or where inefficiencies may exist.
Scrap
Scrap refers to the remnants or pieces left over after production that can be sold off, albeit often for a minimal value. Scrap is a byproduct of manufacturing and can sometimes be repurposed or sold, providing a minor revenue stream.
When calculating the cost of a job, a company may decide to treat scrap sale proceeds either as material or immaterial. If treated as material, the revenue from scrap sales deducts directly from the job cost. This lowers the total cost associated with the production, effectively increasing the overall profit margin for the business. However, if treated as immaterial, the proceedings are not deducted from the production cost. This decision significantly impacts the gross margin calculation by making them appear lower if not deducted.
This flexibility in accounting treatments allows companies to report their financial outcomes in a manner that best reflects their operational realities and financial strategies.
Direct Materials
Direct materials are the raw materials consumed directly in the production of goods. These materials are traceable to a specific product or job, playing a crucial role in job costing.
In a job costing system, calculating the exact quantity and cost of direct materials allows companies to determine precise production costs. For instance, in a given job order, like Job 2346-8 for customer X at MetalWorks, the direct material costs were calculated as $240,000. Direct materials contribute significantly to overall production expenses, which include not only the inherent material costs but also possible costs related to spoilage.
For efficient cost control within a company, it is vital to monitor these material costs closely. Any variances or waste could directly impact the profitability of a job or project.
Direct Labor
Direct labor consists of the wages paid to workers who are directly involved in the manufacturing process. These costs are directly attributed to the specific jobs they work on.
In job costing, direct labor is a key component of total production costs, alongside direct materials and overhead. For example, in the scenario involving MetalWorks, the costs for direct labor were $620,000. Calculating these expenses precisely ensures accurate financial reporting and helps in setting customer pricing efficiently.
Overheads are often calculated as a percentage of direct labor, making its accurate measurement even more crucial. When recording labor costs, companies aim to align them closely with production outputs to maintain cost efficiency and ensure profitability.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

"The inspection point is the key to the allocation of spoilage costs." Do you agree? Explain.

Recognition of loss from spoilage. Arokia Electronics manufactures cell phone models in its Walnut Creek plant. Suppose the company provides you with the following information regarding operations for September 2011. $$\begin{array}{lr} \text { Total cell phones manufactured } & 8,000 \\ \text { Phones rejected as spoiled units } & 300 \\ \text { Total manufacturing cost } & \$ 320,000 \end{array}$$ Assume the spoiled units have no disposal value. 1\. What is the unit cost of making the 8,000 cell phones? 2\. What is the total cost of the 300 spoiled units? 3\. If the spoilage is considered normal, what is the increase in the unit cost of good phones manufactured as a result of the spoilage? 4\. If the spoilage is considered abnormal, prepare the journal entries for the spoilage incurred.

Standard costing method, spoilage, journal entries. Jordan, Inc., is a manufacturer of vents for water heaters. The company uses a process-costing system to account for its work-in-process inventories. When Job 512 was being processed in the machining department, a piece of sheet metal was off center in the bending machine and two vents were spoiled. Because this problem occurs periodically, it is considered normal spoilage and is consequently recorded as an overhead cost. Because this step comes first in the procedure for making the vents, the only costs incurred were \(\$ 475\) for direct materials. Assume the sheet metal cannot be sold, and its cost has been recorded in work-in process inventory. Prepare the journal entries to record the spoilage incurred.

"Normal spoilage is planned spoilage." Discuss.

Reworked units, costs of rework. White Goods assembles washing machines at its Auburn plant. In February 2012,60 tumbler units that cost \(\$ 44\) each (from a new supplier who subsequently went bankrupt) were defective and had to be disposed of at zero net disposal value. White Goods was able to rework all 60 washing machines by substituting new tumbler units purchased from one of its existing suppliers. Each replacement tumbler cost \(\$ 50\) 1\. What alternative approaches are there to account for the material cost of reworked units? 2\. Should White Goods use the \(\$ 44\) tumbler or the \(\$ 50\) tumbler to calculate the cost of materials reworked? Explain. 3\. What other costs might White Goods include in its analysis of the total costs of rework due to the tumbler units purchased from the (now) bankrupt supplier?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.