/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Data from satellite photographs ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Data from satellite photographs of the tropical rain forest in Melonia show that last year the deforestation rate of this environmentally sensitive zone was significantly lower than in previous years. The Melonian government, which spent millions of dollars last year to enforce laws against burning and cutting of the forest, is claiming that the satellite data indicate that its increased efforts to halt the destruction are proving effective. Which one of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the government's claim? (A) Landowner opposition to the government's antideforestation efforts grew more violent last year in response to the increased enforcement. (B) Rainfall during the usually dry 6-month annual burning season was abnormally heavy last year. (C) Government agents had to issue fines totaling over \(\$ 9\) million to 3,500 violators of burning-and-cutting regulations. (D) The inaccessibility of much of the rain forest has made it impossible to confirm the satellite data by direct observation from the field. (E) Much of the money that was designated last year for forest preservation has been spent on research and not on enforcement.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option B undermines the claim because heavy rainfall, not enforcement, could reduce deforestation.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Argument's Claim

The argument's claim is that the reduced deforestation rate is due to the Melonian government's increased enforcement of laws against burning and cutting the forest.
02

Determine What Would Undermine the Claim

To undermine the claim, we need evidence suggesting that factors other than government enforcement were responsible for the reduced deforestation rate.
03

Evaluate Option B

Option B states that there was abnormally heavy rainfall during the usually dry burning season. This could prevent deforestation by making it difficult to set fires, an independent factor unrelated to government efforts.
04

Justify Why Option B Undermines the Claim

If the reduced deforestation rate was due to heavy rainfall rather than the government's enforcement efforts, then the claim that enforcement is effective is weakened.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Deforestation
Deforestation represents a significant environmental issue, especially in regions like the tropical rainforests of Melonia. It involves the large-scale removal of trees, affecting biodiversity, climate, and many species' habitats. The Melonian rainforest, being an environmentally sensitive area, plays a crucial role in air quality and carbon absorption. When these forests are destroyed, it disrupts these ecological services.

Often, deforestation is driven by agriculture, logging, and urban expansion. In Melonia, the practice of burning forests leads to increased deforestation rates. The government’s efforts to reduce these rates are crucial for maintaining ecological balance. This also ties into efforts globally to combat climate change.

Understanding deforestation's impact is vital for developing strategies to mitigate its effects. Better enforcement of laws and sustainable forest management practices are essential steps toward conserving these vital resources.
Environmental Policy
Environmental policy refers to the principles and regulations set forth by governments and organizations to protect the natural environment. In the case of Melonia, the government has implemented policies aimed at reducing deforestation through law enforcement. Such policies are crucial for ensuring sustainable development and ecological conservation.

The Melonian government allocated significant funds to enforce regulations against illegal burning and logging. This shows a commitment to combating deforestation. However, effective policy also requires monitoring and adapting to changes in environmental conditions.

Successful environmental policies often include:
  • Clear, actionable regulations.
  • Enforcement measures including fines or penalties for violators.
  • Involvement of local communities and stakeholders.
  • Adapting strategies based on scientific data and environmental changes.
Without these elements, even well-funded initiatives may not achieve their intended goals.
Argument Evaluation
Evaluating arguments, like assessing the Melonian government’s claim about reduced deforestation, involves critical examination of facts and explanations. In logical reasoning, arguments are assessed based on their premises and the conclusions drawn from them.

In this example, the government claims that their enforcement led to reduced deforestation. Evaluating this claim requires identifying alternative explanations or evidence that could undermine this conclusion. For instance, abnormally heavy rainfall (Option B) during the burning season suggests another reason for reduced deforestation that is unrelated to government actions.

Effective argument evaluation involves:
  • Identifying the main claim and supporting evidence.
  • Looking for alternative explanations or factors.
  • Determining the strength and relevance of each piece of evidence.
This can help in understanding whether the argument holds or needs reconsideration.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the ability to analyze facts, generate and organize ideas, defend opinions, make comparisons, draw inferences, evaluate arguments and solve problems. It’s an essential skill in evaluating claims like those made by the Melonian government regarding deforestation.

Engaging in critical thinking means not accepting claims at face value. Always question the assumptions, analyze the evidence, and consider all potential counterarguments. Given the tropical rainforest situation, questioning if heavy rainfall, rather than enforcement, led to reduced deforestation is a result of critical thinking.

To enhance critical thinking skills, try to:
  • Ask probing questions.
  • Seek out additional information or perspectives.
  • Reflect on your own biases and assumptions.
  • Engage in discussions that challenge your viewpoints.
These practices allow for a deeper understanding and better decision-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Most of the ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's atmosphere from the Sun is absorbed by the layer of stratospheric ozone and never reaches the Earth's surface. Between 1969 and 1986 , the layer of stratospheric ozone over North America thinned, decreasing by about 3 percent. Yet, the average level of ultraviolet radiation measured at research stations across North America decreased over the same period. Which one of the following, if true, best reconciles the apparently discrepant facts described above? (A) Ultraviolet radiation increases the risk of skin cancer and cataracts; the incidence of skin cancer and cataracts increased substantially between 1969 and 1986. (B) Between 1969 and 1986, the layer of stratospheric ozone over Brazil thinned, and the average level of ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth's surface in Brazil increased. (C) Manufactured chlorine chemicals thin the layer of stratospheric ozone. (D) Ozone pollution, which absorbs ultraviolet radiation, increased dramatically between 1969 and 1986. (E) Thinning of the layer of stratospheric ozone varies from one part of the world to another and from year to year.

A translation invariably reflects the writing style of the translator. Sometimes when a long document needs to be translated quickly, several translators are put to work on the job, each assigned to translate part of the document. In these cases, the result is usually a translation marked by different and often incompatible writing styles. Certain computer programs for language translation that work without the intervention of human translators can finish the job faster than human translators and produce a stylistically uniform translation with an 80 percent accuracy rate. Therefore, when a long document needs to be translated quickly, it is better to use a computer translation program than human translators. Which one of the following issues would be LEAST important to resolve in evaluating the argument? (A) whether the problem of stylistic variety in human translation could be solved by giving stylistic guidelines to human translators (B) whether numerical comparisons of the accuracy of translations can reasonably be made (C) whether computer translation programs, like human translators, each have their own distinct writing style (D) whether the computer translation contains errors of grammar and usage that drastically alter the meaning of the text (E) how the accuracy rate of computer translation programs compares with that of human translators in relation to the users' needs

Journalist: Can you give me a summary of the novel you are working on? Novelist: Well, I assume that by "summary" you mean something brief and not a version of the novel itself. The reason I write novels is that what I want to communicate can be communicated only in the form of a novel. So I am afraid I cannot summarize my novel for you in a way that would tell you what I am trying to communicate with this novel. Which one of the following exhibits a pattern of reasoning that is most parallel to that used by the novelist? (A) Only if a drawing can be used as a guide by the builder can it be considered a blueprint. This drawing of the proposed building can be used as a guide by the builder, so it can be considered a blueprint. (B) Only a statement that does not divulge company secrets can be used as a press release. This statement does not divulge company secrets, but it is uninformative and therefore cannot be used as a press release. (C) Watching a travelog is not the same as traveling. But a travelog confers some of the benefits of travel without the hardships of travel. So many people just watch travelogs and do not undergo the hardships of travel. (D) Only a three-dimensional representation of a landscape can convey the experience of being in that landscape. A photograph taken with a traditional camera is not three-dimensional. Therefore a photograph taken with a traditional camera can never convey the experience of being in a landscape. (E) A banquet menu foretells the content of a meal, but some people collect menus in order to remind themselves of great meals they have eaten. Thus a banquet menu has a function not only before, but also after, a meal has been served.

Only if the electorate is moral and intelligent will a democracy function well. Which one of the following can be logically inferred from the claim above? (A) If the electorate is moral and intelligent, then a democracy will function well. (B) Either a democracy does not function well or else the electorate is not moral or not intelligent. (C) If the electorate is not moral or not intelligent, then a democracy will not function well. (D) If a democracy does not function well, then the electorate is not moral or not intelligent. (E) It cannot, at the same time, be true that the electorate is moral and intelligent and that a democracy will not function well.

In the summer of 1936 a polling service telephoned 10,000 United States voters and asked how they planned to vote in the coming presidential election. The survey sample included a variety of respondents - rural and urban, male and female, from every state. The poll predicted that Alfred Landon would soundly defeat Franklin Roosevelt. Nevertheless, Roosevelt won in a landslide. Which one of the following, if true, best explains why the poll's prediction was inaccurate? (A) The interviewers did not reveal their own political affiliation to the respondents. (B) Only people who would be qualified to vote by election time were interviewed, so the survey sample was not representative of the overall United States population. (C) The survey sample was representative only of people who could afford telephones at a time when phone ownership was less common than it is today. (D) No effort was made to determine the respondents' political affiliations. (E) Because the poll asked only for respondents' candidate preference, it collected no information concerning their reasons for favoring Landon or Roosevelt.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.