/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 A translation invariably reflect... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A translation invariably reflects the writing style of the translator. Sometimes when a long document needs to be translated quickly, several translators are put to work on the job, each assigned to translate part of the document. In these cases, the result is usually a translation marked by different and often incompatible writing styles. Certain computer programs for language translation that work without the intervention of human translators can finish the job faster than human translators and produce a stylistically uniform translation with an 80 percent accuracy rate. Therefore, when a long document needs to be translated quickly, it is better to use a computer translation program than human translators. Which one of the following issues would be LEAST important to resolve in evaluating the argument? (A) whether the problem of stylistic variety in human translation could be solved by giving stylistic guidelines to human translators (B) whether numerical comparisons of the accuracy of translations can reasonably be made (C) whether computer translation programs, like human translators, each have their own distinct writing style (D) whether the computer translation contains errors of grammar and usage that drastically alter the meaning of the text (E) how the accuracy rate of computer translation programs compares with that of human translators in relation to the users' needs

Short Answer

Expert verified
C is least important to resolve.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Argument

The argument suggests using computer translation programs instead of human translators when a long document needs to be translated quickly. It claims that computer programs provide a uniform style and operate faster, with an 80% accuracy rate, avoiding the inconsistency in style when multiple human translators are involved.
02

Determine Evaluation Criteria

To evaluate the argument, we need to consider factors like accuracy comparison between computer programs and human translators, stylistic consistency, the impact of translation errors on meaning, and how guidelines could potentially solve the issue of stylistic variety in human translations.
03

Analyze Each Option

Go through each given option to assess its importance in evaluating the argument presented. Identify which aspect is least vital to understanding the rationale behind preferring computer translations over human ones.
04

Evaluate Option (A)

Option (A) discusses the possibility of reducing stylistic variety by providing guidelines to human translators. This is important because solving the stylistic issue might invalidate the primary advantage of using computer programs.
05

Evaluate Option (B)

Option (B) concerns the feasibility of numerically comparing translation accuracies. This is crucial since the argument hinges on the 80% accuracy rate of computer translations.
06

Evaluate Option (C)

Option (C) questions whether computer programs possess distinct writing styles like human translators. This is relevant because if computers have distinct styles, they could potentially conflict, similar to humans.
07

Evaluate Option (D)

Option (D) considers whether translation errors by computers significantly affect text meaning. This is vital as such errors could undermine the utility of computer translations.
08

Evaluate Option (E)

Option (E) compares the accuracy of computer programs with human translators in relation to user needs. This is important since user needs determine the acceptability of certain levels of accuracy.
09

Identify the Least Important Issue

After evaluating all options, (C) emerges as the least important issue because there's no inherent assumption that computer programs vary in style as humans do, thus making any stylistic analysis less crucial.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Translation Accuracy
Translation accuracy refers to how closely a translated text retains the meaning of its original message. Ensuring high accuracy is crucial as it impacts how well the audience understands the translated document. Achieving a perfect translation that conveys every nuance and tone of the original text can be challenging.

Several factors can influence accuracy:
  • Language Complexity: Complex or nuanced languages can be harder to translate accurately.
  • Subject Matter: Technical topics might require a deep understanding to interpret correctly.
  • Context Sensitivity: Understanding the context is key to correct translation.
When translating large texts, accuracy can suffer from stylistic differences among human translators or potential errors in automated translations. Therefore, understanding how each method affects translation accuracy is essential.
Computer Translation
Computer translation refers to the use of software to automatically convert text from one language to another. These programs are designed to quickly produce translations, often with an element of consistency in style that human translators may struggle to achieve over large documents.

Benefits of computer translation:
  • Speed: Computer translations are generally faster than human counterparts.
  • Consistency: Since a computer program's style is uniform, translated text does not suffer from stylistic inconsistency.
  • Cost-Effective: It can reduce costs, especially for large-scale translation needs.
Despite these advantages, computer translations may not satisfy all user needs due to an 80% accuracy rate. This makes understanding their limitations crucial for decision-making.
Human Translators
Human translators bring a level of nuance and understanding that machines may not achieve. Their ability to understand contextual subtleties and culturally relevant nuances allows them to deliver translations that often better capture the original meaning.

Key aspects of human translation include:
  • Cultural Sensitivity: Understanding cultural context helps in capturing the right nuances.
  • Adaptability: Human translators can adjust their work style to better fit the intricacies of the content.
  • Problem Solving: They can tackle complex or ambiguous phrases with deeper understanding and interpretation.
However, using multiple translators in a single document can lead to inconsistent style and interpretations, which is a key argument for using computers where stylistic consistency is prioritized.
Stylistic Consistency
Stylistic consistency ensures a uniform writing style throughout a translated document. It is especially important when the document is split among multiple translators or if there are strict guidelines for maintaining a particular tone or voice.

Why stylistic consistency matters:
  • Brand Identity: Consistent style maintains the brand's voice across translations.
  • Readability: A consistent style helps readers understand and follow the text more easily.
  • Professionalism: Uniformity in style reflects a polished and professional output.
In translation processes, computer programs may provide a more consistent style, whereas human teams often create stylistic variance unless guidelines are strictly enforced. Addressing these differences helps in better choosing between the translation methods.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When a study of aspirin's ability to prevent heart attacks in humans yielded positive results, researchers immediately submitted those results to a medical journal, which published them six weeks later. Had the results been published sooner, many of the heart attacks that occurred during the delay could have been prevented. The conclusion drawn above would be most undermined if it were true that (A) the medical journal's staff worked overtime in order to publish the study's results as soon as possible (B) studies of aspirin's usefulness in reducing heart attacks in laboratory animals remain inconclusive (C) people who take aspirin regularly suffer a higher-than-average incidence of stomach ulcers (D) the medical journal's official policy is to publish articles only after an extensive review process (E) a person's risk of suffering a heart attack drops only after that person has taken aspirin regularly for two years

Some people take their moral cues from governmental codes of law; for them, it is inconceivable that something that is legally permissible could be immoral. Those whose view is described above hold inconsistent beliefs if they also believe that (A) law does not cover all circumstances in which one person morally wrongs another (B) a legally impermissible action is never morally excusable (C) governmental officials sometimes behave illegally (D) the moral consensus of a society is expressed in its laws (E) some governmental regulations are so detailed that they are burdensome to the economy 17\. Certain instruments used in veterinary surgery can be made either of stainless steel or of nylon. In a study of such instruments, 50 complete sterilizations of a set of nylon instruments required \(3.4\) times the amount of energy used to manufacture that set of instruments, whereas 50 complete sterilizations of a set of stainless steel instruments required \(2.1\) times the amount of energy required to manufacture that set of instruments. If the statements above are true, each of the following could be true EXCEPT: (A) The 50 complete sterilizations of the nylon instruments used more energy than did the 50 complete sterilizations of the stainless steel instruments. (B) More energy was required for each complete sterilization of the nylon instruments than was required to manufacture the nylon instruments. (C) More nylon instruments than stainless steel instruments were sterilized in the study. (D) More energy was used to produce the stainless steel instruments than was used to produce the nylon instruments. (E) The total cost of 50 complete sterilizations of the stainless steel instruments was greater than the cost of manufacturing the stainless steel instruments.

Balance is particularly important when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. Facts must not be deliberately manipulated to show one party in a favorable light, and the views of each side should be fairly represented. This concept of balance, however, does not justify concealing or glossing over basic injustices in an effort to be even-handed. If all the media were to adopt such a perverse interpretation of balanced reporting, the public would be given a picture of a world where each party in every conflict had an equal measure of justice on its side, contrary to our experience of life and, indeed, our common sense. Which one of the following best expresses the main point of the argument? (A) Balanced reporting presents the public with a picture of the world in which all sides to a conflict have equal justification. (B) Balanced reporting requires impartially revealing injustices where they occur no less than fairly presenting the views of each party in a conflict. (C) Our experience of life shows that there are indeed cases in which conflicts arise because of an injustice, with one party clearly in the wrong. (D) Common sense tells us that balance is especially needed when reporting the background of civil wars and conflicts. (E) Balanced reporting is an ideal that cannot be realized, because judgments of balance are necessarily subjective.

Politician: From the time our party took office almost four years ago the number of people unemployed city-wide increased by less than 20 percent. The opposition party controlled city government during the four preceding years, and the number of unemployed city residents rose by over 20 percent. Thus, due to our leadership, fewer people now find themselves among the ranks of the unemployed, whatever the opposition may claim. The reasoning in the politician's argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that (A) the claims made by the opposition are simply dismissed without being specified (B) no evidence has been offered to show that any decline in unemployment over the past four years was uniform throughout all areas of the city (C) the issue of how much unemployment in the city is affected by seasonal fluctuations is ignored (D) the evidence cited in support of the conclusion actually provides more support for the denial of the conclusion (E) the possibility has not been addressed that any increase in the number of people employed is due to programs supported by the opposition party

Tall children can generally reach high shelves easily. Short children can generally reach high shelves only with difficulty. It is known that short children are more likely than are tall children to become short adults. Therefore, if short children are taught to reach high shelves easily, the proportion of them who become short adults will decrease. A reasoning error in the argument is that the argument (A) attributes a characteristic of an individual member of a group to the group as a whole (B) presupposes that which is to be proved (C) refutes a generalization by means of an exceptional case (D) assumes a causal relationship where only a correlation has been indicated (E) takes lack of evidence for the existence of a state of affairs as evidence that there can be no such state of affairs

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.