/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 The author uses the example of t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The author uses the example of the Steadicam \({ }^{\mathrm{TM}}\) primarily in order to suggest that (A) the filming of performances should not be limited by inadequate equipment (B) new technologies do not need to be very complex in order to benefit art (C) the interaction of a traditional art form with a new technology will change attitudes toward technology in general (D) the replacement of a traditional technology with a new technology will transform definitions of a traditional art form (E) new technology does not so much preempt as enhance a traditional art form

Short Answer

Expert verified
The correct answer is (E), as the Steadicam enhances rather than replaces traditional filming techniques.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Context

First, review the context provided by the passage about the SteadicamTM. The Steadicam is a piece of filming equipment that allows for smoother and more dynamic camera movements, revolutionizing the way films are shot, particularly in dynamic or otherwise challenging settings.
02

Analyze Each Option

Read each answer option carefully: (A) suggests focusing on overcoming equipment limitations, (B) suggests simplicity in technology can still greatly benefit art, (C) implies that technology affects attitudes toward it, (D) suggests a complete transformation in defining art forms due to technology, and (E) suggests enhancement without preemption of traditional art.
03

Consider the Role of Steadicam

Reflect on how the Steadicam enhances filming. It allows for the continuation of traditional filming techniques while adding new capabilities, rather than replacing the traditional art form entirely.
04

Match Analysis to Options

Based on the understanding that the Steadicam enhances traditional filming without replacing it, we identify option E ('new technology does not so much preempt as enhance a traditional art form') as the best match.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Logical Reasoning
Logical reasoning is a vital component of the LSAT. It tests your ability to analyze arguments, identify flaws, and draw appropriate conclusions. In the original exercise about the Steadicam, logical reasoning skills are crucial to deducing why the author references it. Logical reasoning involves analyzing the context, which in this instance is the revolutionary impact of the Steadicam on filmmaking. You should focus on connecting how traditional filming methods adapt to new technology, and how these enhancements contribute to, rather than wholly replace, existing practices. By evaluating each option thoroughly, you deduce that the appropriate conclusion is that the technology enhances rather than replaces traditional art forms. This helps in choosing the correct answer confidently.
Test Strategies
Effective test strategies can significantly boost your LSAT performance. Begin by thoroughly reading the passage to understand the context. This ensures that you're well-prepared when evaluating answer choices.

In the case of the Steadicam exercise, use a process of elimination. Initially discard answers that directly contradict the information you know. For example, options suggesting complete replacement might be less plausible if the context emphasizes enhancement. Always validate your final choice by revisiting the passage and ensuring it aligns closely with your understanding.

Keep track of time, and ensure each question is given adequate attention. Prioritizing questions where you're more confident can help maximize your score. This strategic approach helps you remain calm and focused throughout the exam, leading to better results.
Reading Comprehension
Reading comprehension is another key area for the LSAT. It involves understanding, analyzing, and synthesizing information presented in written form. In the given exercise, comprehending the narrative about the Steadicam involves not just reading but understanding its implied roles and benefits.

Focus on identifying the author's main argument or purpose behind selecting an example, like the Steadicam. Are they highlighting its innovative nature, its simplicity, or its ability to coexist with traditional techniques? Effective analysis of these details is essential.

Improve your reading comprehension by practicing active reading. Take notes, underline key phrases, and jot down potential implications. This keeps you engaged and helps retain important details for answering questions accurately. Reading comprehension isn't just about what you read, but how well you grasp and apply the knowledge.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is the backbone of solving complex problems presented in LSAT questions. It requires analyzing situations from different perspectives, and carefully questioning assumptions and inferences. In the exercise, critical thinking involves assessing how the Steadicam contributes to and interacts with traditional filmmaking.

Break down the argument into smaller components. Consider what is explicitly stated about the Steadicam and its impact. Then, use inference to draw conclusions about how it changes filmmaking techniques. Does it replace them, or does it add value to them?

Encourage yourself to question any biases or preconceived notions you might have about technology and art. This allows you to approach the exercise more objectively, leading to a comprehensive and accurate answer. Critical thinking isn't about finding one straightforward answer. It's about exploring multiple angles to arrive at a well-justified conclusion.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

When a study of aspirin's ability to prevent heart attacks in humans yielded positive results, researchers immediately submitted those results to a medical journal, which published them six weeks later. Had the results been published sooner, many of the heart attacks that occurred during the delay could have been prevented. The conclusion drawn above would be most undermined if it were true that (A) the medical journal's staff worked overtime in order to publish the study's results as soon as possible (B) studies of aspirin's usefulness in reducing heart attacks in laboratory animals remain inconclusive (C) people who take aspirin regularly suffer a higher-than-average incidence of stomach ulcers (D) the medical journal's official policy is to publish articles only after an extensive review process (E) a person's risk of suffering a heart attack drops only after that person has taken aspirin regularly for two years

Lucien's argument against the public-housing advocates' position is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms? (A) It offers no justification for dismissing as absurd the housing advocates' claim that there are many homeless people in the city. (B) It treats information acquired through informal conversations as though it provided evidence as strong as information acquired on the basis of controlled scientific studies. (C) It responds to a claim in which "available" is used in the sense of "affordable" by using "available" in the sense of "not occupied." (D) It overlooks the possibility that not all apartment buildings have vacant apartments for rent. (E) It fails to address the issue, raised by the public-housing advocates' argument, of who would pay for the construction of more low-income housing.

Crimes in which handguns are used are more likely than other crimes to result in fatalities. However, the majority of crimes in which handguns are used do not result in fatalities. Therefore, there is no need to enact laws that address crimes involving handguns as distinct from other crimes. The pattern of flawed reasoning displayed in the argument above most closely resembles that in which one of the following? (A) Overweight people are at higher risk of developing heart disease than other people. However, more than half of all overweight people never develop heart disease. Hence it is unnecessary for physicians to be more careful to emphasize the danger of heart disease to their overweight patients than to their other patients. (B) Many people swim daily in order to stay physically fit. Yet people who swim daily increase their risk of developing ear infections. Hence people who want to remain in good health are better off not following fitness programs that include swimming daily. (C) Most physicians recommend a balanced diet for those who want to remain in good health. Yet many people find that nontraditional dietary regimens such as extended fasting do their health no serious harm. Therefore, there is no need for everyone to avoid nontraditional dietary regimens. (D) Foods rich in cholesterol and fat pose a serious health threat to most people. However, many people are reluctant to give up eating foods that they greatly enjoy. Therefore, people who refuse to give up rich foods need to spend more time exercising than do other people. (E) Many serious health problems are the result of dietary disorders. Yet these disorders are often brought about by psychological factors. Hence people suffering from serious health problems should undergo psychological evaluation.

Some people take their moral cues from governmental codes of law; for them, it is inconceivable that something that is legally permissible could be immoral. Those whose view is described above hold inconsistent beliefs if they also believe that (A) law does not cover all circumstances in which one person morally wrongs another (B) a legally impermissible action is never morally excusable (C) governmental officials sometimes behave illegally (D) the moral consensus of a society is expressed in its laws (E) some governmental regulations are so detailed that they are burdensome to the economy 17\. Certain instruments used in veterinary surgery can be made either of stainless steel or of nylon. In a study of such instruments, 50 complete sterilizations of a set of nylon instruments required \(3.4\) times the amount of energy used to manufacture that set of instruments, whereas 50 complete sterilizations of a set of stainless steel instruments required \(2.1\) times the amount of energy required to manufacture that set of instruments. If the statements above are true, each of the following could be true EXCEPT: (A) The 50 complete sterilizations of the nylon instruments used more energy than did the 50 complete sterilizations of the stainless steel instruments. (B) More energy was required for each complete sterilization of the nylon instruments than was required to manufacture the nylon instruments. (C) More nylon instruments than stainless steel instruments were sterilized in the study. (D) More energy was used to produce the stainless steel instruments than was used to produce the nylon instruments. (E) The total cost of 50 complete sterilizations of the stainless steel instruments was greater than the cost of manufacturing the stainless steel instruments.

Purebred dogs are prone to genetically determined abnormalities. Although such abnormalities often can be corrected by surgery, the cost can reach several thousand dollars. Since nonpurebred dogs rarely suffer from genetically determined abnormalities, potential dog owners who want to reduce the risk of incurring costly medical bills for their pets would be well advised to choose nonpurebred dogs. Which one of the following if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Most genetically determined abnormalities in dogs do not seriously affect a dog's general well-being. (B) All dogs, whether purebred or nonpurebred, are subject to the same common nongenetically determined diseases. (C) Purebred dogs tend to have shorter natural life spans than do nonpurebred dogs. (D) The purchase price of nonpurebred dogs tends to be lower than the purchase price of purebred dogs. (E) A dog that does not have genetically determined abnormalities may nevertheless have offspring with such abnormalities.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on English Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.