/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 4.23 Use the definition of enthalpy t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Use the definition of enthalpy to calculate the change in enthalpy between points 1 and 2 of the Rankine cycle, for the same numerical parameters as used in the text. Recalculate the efficiency using your corrected value ofH2, and comment on the accuracy of the approximationH2≈H1.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The efficiency of the Rankine cycle could not result in efficiency even closer to 1because of some heat and pressure losses that are encountered during the process. The efficiency of the cycle is0.4775.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Introduction

To evaluate the Rankine cycle's efficiency, one must first compute the enthalpy energy change at various points throughout the cycle, i.e., the amount of heat absorbed or rejected by the system at constant pressure at various times.

The Rankine cycle's efficiency is:

e=1-H4-H1H3-H2

where

H1=Enthalpyatpoint1H2=Enthalpyatpoint2H3=Enthalpyatpoint3H4=Enthalpyatpoint4

02

Step 2. Calculation

The expression which relates the enthalpy change to the change in internal energy, volume and pressure is dH=dU+PdV+VdP.

By second law of thermodynamics »å±«=°Õ»å³§-±Ê»å³Õ+μ»å±·.

Putting the value of dUin the first expression.

»å±á=°Õ»å³§-±Ê»å³Õ+μ»å±·+±Ê»å³Õ+³Õ»å±Ê.

Here μ»å±·is ignored as the amount of fluid is not changing. So, the value gives 0.

And entropy for the points 1and 2is also zero. So, dSis also ignored.

Hence the expression becomes dH=VdP.

Calculating the change in enthalpy change by assuming the pressure condition of 200 bars, then ΔH12=VΔP.

Substituting values of

V=1dm3=10-3m3∆±Ê=298×105N/m2

So, ΔH12=10-3m3298×105N/m2=29.8KJ

Using the expression,

H2=H1+ΔH12=84KJ+29.8KJ=113.8KJ

03

Step 3. Calculating efficiency

As,

H1=84KJH2=113.8KJH3=3444KJH4=1824KJ

So,

e=1-H4-H1H3-H2=1-1824-843444-113.8=0.4775

04

Step 4. Conclusion

Thus efficiency of the cycle is 0.4775.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider an ideal Hampson-Linde cycle in which no heat is lost to the environment.

(a) Argue that the combination of the throttling valve and the heat exchanger is a constant-enthalpy device, so that the total enthalpy of the fluid coming out of this combination is the same as the enthalpy of the fluid going in.

(b) Let xbe the fraction of the fluid that liquefies on each pass through the cycle. Show that

x=Hout-HinHout-Hliq,

where Hinis the enthalpy of each mole of compressed gas that goes into the heat exchanger, Houtis the enthalpy of each mole of low-pressure gas that comes out of the heat exchanger, and Hliqis the enthalpy of each mole of liquid produced.

(c) Use the data in Table 4.5to calculate the fraction of nitrogen liquefied on each pass through a Hampson-Linde cycle operating between 1 bar and 100 bars, with an input temperature of 300K. Assume that the heat exchanger works perfectly, so the temperature of the low-pressure gas coming out of it is the same as the temperature of the high-pressure gas going in. Repeat the calculation for an input temperature of 200K.

The magnetic field created by a dipole has a strength of approximately μ0/4πμ/r3, where r is the distance from the dipole and μ0is the "permeability of free space," equal to exactly 4π×10-7in SI units. (In the formula I'm neglecting the variation of field strength with angle, which is at most a factor of 2.) Consider a paramagnetic salt like iron ammonium alum, in which the magnetic moment μof each dipole is approximately one Bohr magneton 9×10-24J/T, with the dipoles separated by a distance of 1nm. Assume that the dipoles interact only via ordinary magnetic forces.

(a) Estimate the strength of the magnetic field at the location of a dipole, due to its neighboring dipoles. This is the effective field strength even when there is no externally applied field.

(b) If a magnetic cooling experiment using this material begins with an external field strength of 1T, by about what factor will the temperature decrease when the external field is turned off?

(c) Estimate the temperature at which the entropy of this material rises most steeply as a function of temperature, in the absence of an externally applied field.

(d) If the final temperature in a cooling experiment is significantly less than the temperature you found in part (c), the material ends up in a state where ∂S/∂Tis very small and therefore its heat capacity is very small. Explain why it would be impractical to try to reach such a low temperature with this material.

In an absorption refrigerator, the energy driving the process is supplied not as work, but as heat from a gas flame. (Such refrigerators commonly use propane as fuel, and are used in locations where electricity is unavailable.* ) Let us define the following symbols, all taken to be positive by definition:
Qf= heat input from flame
Qc= heat extracted from inside refrigerator
Qr= waste heat expelled to room
Tf= temperature of flame
Tc= temperature inside refrigerator
Tr= room temperature

(a) Explain why the "coefficient of performance" (COP) for an absorption refrigerator should be defined as Qc / Qf.
(b) What relation among Qf, Qc, and Qr is implied by energy conservation alone? Will energy conservation permit the COP to be greater than 1 ?
(c) Use the second law of thermodynamics to derive an upper limit on the COP, in terms of the temperatures Tf, Tc, and Tr alone.

Derive equation 4.10for the efficiency of the Otto cycle.

A common (but imprecise) way of stating the third law of thermodynamics is "You can't reach absolute zero." Discuss how the third law, as stated in Section 3.2, puts limits on how low a temperature can be attained by various refrigeration techniques.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Physics Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.