/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 9 The following table shows the My... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The following table shows the Myers-Briggs personality preferences for a random sample of 406 people in the listed professions (Atlas of Type Tables by Macdaid, McCaulley, and Kainz). E refers to extroverted and I refers to introverted. $$\begin{array}{l|c|c|c} \hline \multirow{2}{*} {\text { Occupation }} & \multicolumn{3}{|c} {\text { Personality Preference Type }} \\ \\)\cline { 2 - 5 } & \\( \mathrm{E} & \mathrm{I} & \text { Row Total } \\ \hline \text { Clergy (all denominations) } & 62 & 45 & 107 \\ \hline \text { M.D. } & 68 & 94 & 162 \\ \hline \text { Lawyer } & 56 & 81 & 137 \\ \hline \text { Column Total } & 186 & 220 & 406 \\ \hline \end{array}$$Use the chi-square test to determine if the listed occupations and personality preferences are independent at the 0.05 level of significance.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Perform a chi-square test to check independence; if calculated \( \chi^2 > 5.99 \), occupations and preferences are not independent.

Step by step solution

01

Hypotheses Formulation

First, we formulate the null and alternative hypotheses. **Null Hypothesis (H_0)**: The listed occupations and personality preferences are independent. **Alternative Hypothesis (H_1)**: The listed occupations and personality preferences are not independent.
02

Observed Frequencies Table

Identify the observed frequency counts from the provided table. These are the actual counts given: - Clergy E = 62, I = 45 - M.D. E = 68, I = 94 - Lawyer E = 56, I = 81 - Column totals: E = 186, I = 220.
03

Calculate Expected Frequencies

Use the formula for expected frequency: \[ E_{ij} = \frac{( ext{Row Total})( ext{Column Total})}{ ext{Grand Total}} \] Calculate for each cell. For example, for Clergy E: \[ E_{11} = \frac{(107)(186)}{406} \approx 49.14 \] Continue similarly for the other cells.
04

Chi-square Test Statistic Calculation

Use the formula: \[ \chi^2 = \sum \frac{(O_{ij} - E_{ij})^2}{E_{ij}} \] Calculate for each observed and expected pairing. Sum all the values to get \( \chi^2 \).
05

Degrees of Freedom

Calculate the degrees of freedom using the formula: \[ \text{d.f.} = (r-1)(c-1) \] where \( r \) is the number of rows, \( c \) is the number of columns. Substituting gives: \( (3-1)(2-1) = 2 \) degrees of freedom.
06

Determine the Critical Value

Look up the critical value from the chi-square distribution table, using \( \alpha = 0.05 \) and 2 degrees of freedom. The critical value is approximately 5.99.
07

Test Decision

Compare your calculated \( \chi^2 \) value with the critical value from the chi-square table. If \( \chi^2_{calculated} > 5.99 \), reject the null hypothesis. Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a fundamental starting point in statistical testing. It is a statement you make when beginning a hypothesis test. In our chi-square test, the null hypothesis states that the two variables in question, such as occupation and personality preferences, are independent.
This means that your null hypothesis assumes no relationship exists between the variables you are testing. In our example, the null hypothesis can be expressed as: 'The listed occupations and personality preferences are independent.'

The purpose of the null hypothesis is to provide a base or a status quo that your data can be tested against. If the test results significantly diverge from what is expected under the null hypothesis, this suggests that the hypothesis may not hold true.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis offers a different perspective from the null hypothesis. It is what you consider to be true if the null hypothesis is rejected.
In our case, the alternative hypothesis would be that an association does exist between the two variables, occupations and personality preferences. This is articulated as: 'The listed occupations and personality preferences are not independent.'

The alternative hypothesis explores the possibility of a dependency or relationship between the variables. This hypothesis is critical to scientific testing as it represents new findings or results that contradict the status quo.
Expected Frequencies
Expected frequencies are a crucial component of performing a chi-square test. They represent what we expect to find if the null hypothesis were true. To calculate them, you use the formula: \[ E_{ij} = \frac{(\text{Row Total})(\text{Column Total})}{\text{Grand Total}} \]
In our example, for the Clergy with an Extroverted preference, the expected frequency is determined by plugging in the appropriate row and column totals into the formula, yielding approximately 49.14.

Calculating expected frequencies enables you to measure how observed data deviates from what is expected under the null hypothesis. Large deviations suggest that the null hypothesis may not be valid.
Degrees of Freedom
Degrees of freedom is an important concept in statistical calculations, affecting how the chi-square test statistic is interpreted. It reflects the number of values that are free to vary in the final calculation of a statistic.

For our chi-square test, degrees of freedom are calculated using the formula: \[ \text{d.f.} = (r-1)(c-1) \] where \( r \) is the number of rows, and \( c \) is the number of columns in the table of data. In our case with 3 occupations and 2 personality preferences, the degrees of freedom is \( (3-1)(2-1) = 2 \).

This metric is essential because it helps identify the appropriate distribution of the chi-square statistic, which in turn is used to determine if the test evidence is sufficient to reject the null hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

You don't need to be rich to buy a few shares in a mutual fund. The question is, "How reliable are mutual funds as investments?" That depends on the type of fund you buy. The following data are based on information taken from Morningstar, a mutual fund guide available in most libraries. A random sample of percentage annual returns for mutual funds holding stocks in aggressive- growth small companies is shown next. $$\begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{ccccccccc} -1.8 & 14.3 & 41.5 & 17.2-16.8 & 4.4 & 32.6 & -7.3 & 16.2 & 2.8 & 34.3 \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{llllllll} -10.6 & 8.4 & -7.0 & -2.3-18.5 & 25.0 & -9.8 & -7.8 & -24.6 & 22.8 \end{array} \end{aligned}$$ Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2} \approx 348.43\) for the sample of aggressive growth small company funds. Another random sample of percentage annual returns for mutual funds holding value (i.e., market under priced) stocks in large companies is shown next. $$\begin{aligned} &\begin{array}{ccccccccc} 16.2 & 0.3 & 7.8 & -1.6 & -3.8 & 19.4 & -2.5 & 15.9 & 32.6 & 22.1 & 3.4 \end{array}\\\ &\begin{array}{ccccccccc} -0.5-8.3 & 25.8 & -4.1 & 14.6 & 6.5 & 18.0 & 21.0 & 0.2 & -1.6 \end{array} \end{aligned}$$ Use a calculator to verify that \(s^{2} \approx 137.31\) for value stocks in large companies. Test the claim that the population variance for mutual funds holding aggressive-growth small stocks is larger than the population variance for mutual funds holding value stocks in large companies. Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance. How could your test conclusion relate to the question of reliability of returns for each type of mutual fund?

For the study regarding mean cadence (see Problem 1), two-way ANOVA was used. Recall that the two factors were walking device (none, standard walker, rolling walker) and dual task (being required to respond vocally to a signal or no dual task required). Results of two-way ANOVA showed that there was no evidence of interaction between the factors. However, according to the article, "The ANOVA conducted on the cadence data revealed a main effect of walking device." When the hypothesis regarding no difference in mean cadence according to which, if any, walking device was used, the sample \(F\) was \(30.94,\) with \(d, f_{N}=2\) and \(d . f_{. D}=18\) Further, the \(P\) -value for the result was reported to be less than \(0.01 .\) From this information, what is the conclusion regarding any difference in mean cadence according to the factor "walking device used"?

Economics: Profits per Employee How productive are U.S. workers? One way to answer this question is to study annual profits per employee. A random sample of companies in computers (I), aerospace (II), heavy equipment (III), and broadcasting (IV) gave the following data regarding annual profits per employee (units in thousands of dollars) (Source: Forbes Top Companies, edited by J. T. Davis, John Wiley and Sons).$$\begin{array}{cccc}\mathbf{I} & \mathbf{I I} & \mathbf{I I I} & \mathbf{I V} \\\27.8 & 13.3 & 22.3 & 17.1 \\\23.8 & 9.9 & 20.9 & 16.9 \\\14.1 & 11.7 & 7.2 & 14.3 \\\8.8 & 8.6 & 12.8 & 15.2 \\\11.9 & 6.6 & 7.0 & 10.1 \end{array}$$. Shall we reject or not reject the claim that there is no difference in population mean annual profits per employee in each of the four types of companies? Use a \(5 \%\) level of significance.

Sales An executive at the home office of Big Rock Life Insurance is considering three branch managers as candidates for promotion to vice president. The branch reports include records showing sales volume for each salesperson in the branch (in hundreds of thousands of dollars). A random sample of these records was selected for salespersons in each branch. All three branches are located in cities in which per capita income is the same. The executive wishes to compare these samples to see if there is a significant difference in performance of salespersons in the three different branches. If so, the information will be used to determine which of the managers to promote. Branch Managed by Adams $$\begin{aligned}&7.2\\\&6.4\\\&10.1\\\&11.0\\\&\begin{array}{r}9.9 \\\10.6\end{array}\end{aligned}$$ Branch Managed by McDale $$\begin{aligned}&\begin{array}{r}8.8 \\\10.7\end{array}\\\&\begin{array}{c}11.1 \\\9.8\end{array} \end{aligned}$$. Branch Managed by Vasquez $$\begin{aligned}&6.9\\\&8.7\\\&10.5\\\&11.4\end{aligned}$$ Use an \(\alpha=0.01\) level of significance. Shall we reject or not reject the claim that there are no differences among the performances of the salespersons in I the different branches?

For chi-square tests of independence and of homogeneity, do we use a right- tailed, left-tailed, or two-tailed test?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.