Chapter 13: Problem 43
What is the plurality-with-elimination method? Why is it advantageous to rank the candidates when using this method?
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 13: Problem 43
What is the plurality-with-elimination method? Why is it advantageous to rank the candidates when using this method?
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
Three candidates, \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}\), and \(\mathrm{C}\), are running for mayor. Election rules stipulate that the plurality method will determine the winner. In the event that the plurality method leads to a tie, the Borda count method will decide the winner. The election results are summarized in the following preference table. Under these rules, which candidate becomes the new mayor? $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Number of Votes } & \mathbf{1 2 , 0 0 0} & \mathbf{7 5 0 0} & \mathbf{4 5 0 0} \\ \hline \text { First Choice } & \text { C } & \text { A } & \text { A } \\ \hline \text { Second Choice } & \text { B } & \text { B } & \text { C } \\ \hline \text { Third Choice } & \text { A } & \text { C } & \text { B } \\ \hline \end{array} $$
Explain why Hamilton's method satisfies the quota rule.
In Exercises 19-22, suppose that the pairwise comparison method is used to determine the winner in an election. If there are five candidates, how many comparisons must be made?
A small country has 24 seats in the congress, divided among the three states according to their respective populations. The table shows each state’s population, in thousands, before and after the country’s population increase. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { State } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { C } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Original Population } \\ \text { (in thousands) } \end{array} & 530 & 990 & 2240 & 3760 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { New Population (in } \\ \text { thousands) } \end{array} & 680 & 1250 & 2570 & 4500 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the 24 congressional seats using the original population. b. Find the percent increase, to the nearest tenth of a percent, in the population of each state. c. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the 24 congressional seats using the new population. Does the population paradox occur? Explain your answer.
Four professors are running for chair of the Natural Science Division: Professors Darwin (D), Einstein (E), Freud (F), and Hawking (H). The votes of the professors in the natural science division are summarized in the following preference table. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Number of Votes } & 30 & 22 & 20 & 12 & 2 \\ \hline \text { First Choice } & \text { D } & \text { E } & \text { F } & \text { H } & \text { H } \\ \hline \text { Second Choice } & \text { H } & \text { F } & \text { E } & \text { E } & \text { F } \\ \hline \text { Third Choice } & \text { F } & \text { H } & \text { H } & \text { F } & \text { D } \\ \hline \text { Fourth Choice } & \text { E } & \text { D } & \text { D } & \text { D } & \text { E } \\ \hline \end{array} $$ Who is declared the new division chair using the plurality method?
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.