Chapter 13: Problem 34
Explain why Hamilton's method satisfies the quota rule.
/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none}
Learning Materials
Features
Discover
Chapter 13: Problem 34
Explain why Hamilton's method satisfies the quota rule.
All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.
Get started for free
A small country has 24 seats in the congress, divided among the three states according to their respective populations. The table shows each state’s population, in thousands, before and after the country’s population increase. $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text { State } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { C } & \text { Total } \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { Original Population } \\ \text { (in thousands) } \end{array} & 530 & 990 & 2240 & 3760 \\ \hline \begin{array}{l} \text { New Population (in } \\ \text { thousands) } \end{array} & 680 & 1250 & 2570 & 4500 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the 24 congressional seats using the original population. b. Find the percent increase, to the nearest tenth of a percent, in the population of each state. c. Use Hamilton’s method to apportion the 24 congressional seats using the new population. Does the population paradox occur? Explain your answer.
What is the plurality-with-elimination method? Why is it advantageous to rank the candidates when using this method?
Three candidates, \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}\), and \(\mathrm{C}\), are running for mayor. Election rules stipulate that the plurality method will determine the winner. In the event that the plurality method leads to a tie, the Borda count method will decide the winner. The election results are summarized in the following preference table. Under these rules, which candidate becomes the new mayor? $$ \begin{array}{|l|c|c|c|} \hline \text { Number of Votes } & \mathbf{1 2 , 0 0 0} & \mathbf{7 5 0 0} & \mathbf{4 5 0 0} \\ \hline \text { First Choice } & \text { C } & \text { A } & \text { A } \\ \hline \text { Second Choice } & \text { B } & \text { B } & \text { C } \\ \hline \text { Third Choice } & \text { A } & \text { C } & \text { B } \\ \hline \end{array} $$
In Exercises 19-22, suppose that the pairwise comparison method is used to determine the winner in an election. If there are five candidates, how many comparisons must be made?
The preference table shows the results of an election among three candidates, A, B, and C. $$ \begin{array}{|l|l|l|l|} \hline \text { Number of Votes } & \mathbf{7} & \mathbf{3} & \mathbf{2} \\ \hline \text { First Choice } & \text { A } & \text { B } & \text { C } \\ \hline \text { Second Choice } & \text { B } & \text { C } & \text { B } \\ \hline \text { Third Choice } & \text { C } & \text { A } & \text { A } \\ \hline \end{array} $$ a. Using the plurality method, who is the winner? b. Is the majority criterion satisfied? Explain your answer. c. Is the head-to-head criterion satisfied? Explain your answer. d. The two voters on the right both move candidate A from last place on their preference lists to first place on their preference lists. Construct a new preference table for the election. Using the table and the plurality method, who is the winner? e. Suppose that candidate C drops out, but the winner is still chosen by the plurality method. Is the irrelevant alternatives criterion satisfied? Explain your answer. f. Do your results from parts (b) through (e) contradict Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem? Explain your answer.
What do you think about this solution?
We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.