/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 70 Two-sided test The one-sample t ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Two-sided test The one-sample t statistic from a sample of n=25observations for the two-sided test of H0:μ=64;Ha:μ≠64has the value t=-1.12.

(a) Find the P-value for this test using (i) Table Band (ii) your calculator. What conclusion would you draw at the 5%significance level? At the 1%significance level?

(b) Redo part (a) using an alternative hypothesis of Ha:μ<64.

Short Answer

Expert verified

a. Table B: 0.05<p-value<0.1. Technology: the P-value is 0.2738.Fail to reject H0at both levels.

b. Table B: 0.05<p-value<0.1. Technology: the P-value is 0.1368. Fail to reject H0at both levels.

Step by step solution

01

Given information

Two-sided test The one-sample t statistic from a sample of n=25observations for the two-sided test of H0:μ=64;Ha:μ≠64has the valuet=-1.12.

02

Explanation (part a)

(i) Table B: Using Table B, we get 0.05<p-value<0.1

(ii) Calculator: Performing the test with significance level 0.05,

p-value:0.27379726

Decision: There is not enough evidence to rejectHâ‚¶Ä at the significance level 0.05, because your p-value is greater than 0.05.

Performing the test with significance level 0.1.

p-value:0.27379726

Decision: There is not enough evidence to rejectHâ‚¶Ä at the significance level 0.1, because your p-value is greater than 0.1.

Conclusion: Fail to reject H0at both levels.

03

Explanation (part b)

Redo part (a) using an alternative hypothesis of Ha:μ<64

(i) Table B: Using Table B, we get 0.05<p-value<0.1

(ii) Calculator: Performing the test with a significance level0.05,

p-value:0.13689863

Decision: There is not enough evidence to rejectHâ‚¶Ä at the significance level 0.05, because your p-value is greater than 0.05.

Performing the test with a significance level 0.1.

p-value:0.13689863

Decision: There is not enough evidence to rejectHâ‚¶Ä at the significance level 0.1,because your p-value is greater than 0.1.

Conclusion: Fail to reject H0at both levels.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do you have ESP? A researcher looking for evidence of extrasensory perception (ESP) tests 500subjects. Four of these subjects do significantly better P<0.01than random guessing.

(a) Is it proper to conclude that these four people have ESP? Explain your answer.

(b) What should the researcher now do to test whether any of these four subjects have ESP?

The P-value for a two-sided test of the null hypothesis H0:μ=10is 0.06

(a) Does the95%confidence interval forMinclude 10? Why or why not?

(b) Does the 90%confidence interval forMinclude 10? Why or why not

Does listening to music while studying help or hinder students’ learning? Two AP Statistics students designed an experiment to find out. They selected a random sample of 30students from their medium-sized high school to participate. Each subject was given10minutes to memorize two different lists of 20words, once while listening to music and once in silence. The order of the two word lists was determined at random; so was the order of the treatments. A boxplot of the differences in the number of words recalled (music- silent) is shown below, along with some Minitab output from a one-sample t test. Perform a complete analysis of the students’ data. Include a confidence interval.

The recommended daily allowance (RDA) of calcium for women between the ages of 18 and 24 years is 1200 milligrams (mg). Researchers who were involved in a large-scale study of women’s bone health suspected that

their participants had significantly lower calcium intakes than the RDA. To test this suspicion, the researchers measured the daily calcium intake of a random sample of 36 women from the study who fell in the desired age range. The Minitab output below displays descriptive statistics for these data, along with the results of a significance test.

(a) Determine whether there are any outliers. Show your work.

(b) Interpret the P-value in context.

(c) Do these data give convincing evidence to support the researchers’ suspicion? Carry out a test to help your answer

Paying high prices? A retailer entered into an exclusive agreement with a supplier who guaranteed to provide all products at competitive prices. The retailer eventually began to purchase supplies from other vendors who offered better prices. The original supplier filed a lawsuit claiming violation of the agreement. In defense, the retailer had an audit performed on a random sample of 25invoices. For each audited invoice, all purchases made from other suppliers were examined and compared with those offered by the original supplier. The percent of purchases on each invoice for which an alternative supplier offered a lower price than the original supplier was recorded.26For example, a data value of 38means that the price would be lower with a different supplier for 38%of the items on the invoice. A histogram and some computer output

for these data are shown below. Explain why we should not carry out a one-sample t-test in this setting.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.