/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q R3.1. The risks of obesity A study obs... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 3: Q R3.1. (page 198)

The risks of obesity A study observes a large group of people over a 10-year period. The goal is to see if overweight and obese people are more likely to die during the study than people who weigh less. Such studies can be misleading because obese people are more likely to be inactive

and poor.

(a) What are the explanatory and response variables in the study?

(b) If the study finds a strong association between these variables, can we conclude that increased

weight causes a greater risk of dying? Why or why not?

Short Answer

Expert verified

Part (a) The probability is 0.875

Part (b) No.

Step by step solution

01

Part (a) Step 1: Given information

Obese people are more likely to die than persons who weigh less, according to a study. Obese people are lethargic and lazy, which could be a confounder.

02

Part (a) Step 2: Concept

Relationships between variables can be described as null, covariant, or influential.

03

Part (a) Step 3: Explanation

Because it is reliant on the people's weight, the death rate is the response variable in this situation. As a result, mortality rate is a response variable, while weight is an explanatory variable.

04

Part (b) Step 1: Explanation

It is impossible to say that obesity causes an increase in the risk of death because other factors such as activity and affluence might influence weight and mortality rates. As a result, it is impossible to concur with the given statement.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Data on dating Refer to Exercise 20.

(a) How would r change if all the men were 6 inches shorter than the heights given in the table? Does the correlation tell us if women tend to date men taller than themselves?

(b) If heights were measured in centimeters rather than inches, how would the correlation change? (There are 2.54centimeters in an inch.)

Predict the rat鈥檚 weight after16 weeks. Show your work

Husbands and wives The mean height of American women in their early twenties is 64.5inches and the standard deviation is 2.5inches. The mean height of men the same age is 68.5inches, with a standard deviation of 2.7inches. The correlation between the heights of husbands and wives is about r = 0.5.

(a) Find the equation of the least-squares regression line for predicting the husband鈥檚 height from the wife鈥檚 height. Show your work.

(b) Use your regression line to predict the height of the husband of a woman who is 67inches tall. Explain why you could have given this result without doing the calculation

In its Fuel Economy Guide for 2008 model vehicles, the Environmental Protection Agency gives data on 1152vehicles. There are a number of outliers, main vehicles with very poor gas mileage. If we ignore the outliers, however, the combined city and highway gas mileage of the other 1120

or so vehicles are approximately Normal with a mean of 18.7miles per gallon (mpg) and a standard deviation of 4.3 mpg.

The top 10%(2.2)How high must a 2008vehicle鈥檚 gas mileage be in order to fall in the top 10% of all vehicles? (The distribution omits a few high outliers, mainly hybrid gas-electric vehicles.)

Teaching and research A college newspaper interviews a psychologist about student ratings of the teaching of faculty members. The psychologist says, 鈥淭he evidence indicates that the correlation between the research productivity and teaching rating of faculty members is close to zero.鈥� The paper reports this as 鈥淧rofessor McDaniel said that good researchers tend to be poor teachers, and vice versa.鈥� Explain why the paper鈥檚 report is wrong. Write a statement in plain language (don鈥檛 use the word 鈥渃orrelation鈥�) to explain the psychologist鈥檚 meaning.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Calculus

Read Explanation

Decision Maths

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.