/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Q. 16 The Environmental Protection Age... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The Environmental Protection Agency is charged with monitoring industrial emissions that pollute the atmosphere and water. So long as emission levels stay within specified guidelines, the EPA does not take action against the polluter. If the polluter is in violation of the regulations, the offender can be fined, forced to clean up the problem, or possibly closed. Suppose that for a particular industry the acceptable emission level has been set at no more than 5parts per million (5ppm). The null and alternative hypotheses are H0role="math" localid="1650298159260" :μ=5versus Ha=μ>5. Which of the following describes a Type II error?

(a) The EPA fails to find evidence that emissions exceed acceptable limits when, in fact, they are within acceptable limits.

(b) The EPA concludes that emissions exceed acceptable limits when, in fact, they are within acceptable limits.

(c) The EPA concludes that emissions exceed acceptable limits when, in fact, they do exceed acceptable limits.

(d) The EPA takes more samples to ensure that they make the correct decision.

(e) The EPA fails to find evidence that emissions exceed acceptable limits when, in fact, they do exceed acceptable limits.

Short Answer

Expert verified

The Type II error is that The EPA fails to find evidence that emissions exceed acceptable limits when, in fact, they do exceed acceptable limit i.e., answer is (e).

Step by step solution

01

Given Information

We are given that the null hypotheses H0:μ=5and the alternative hypotheses Ha:μ>5and

we have to find out the option that is describing the Type II error.

02

Reason

Now, In Type II error, The EPA is failing to reject the null hypotheses but in this null hypotheses is false.

As according to null hypotheses population mean emission is 5but alternative population mean emission is greater than5.

Hence, The Type II error is that (e)The EPA fails to find evidence that emissions exceed acceptable limits when, in fact, they do exceed acceptable limits.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Aspirin prevents blood from clotting and so helps prevent strokes. The Second European Stroke Prevention Study asked whether adding another anti-clotting drug, named dipyridamole, would be more effective for patients who had already had a stroke. Here are the data on strokes and deaths during the two years of the study.

Number ofpatientsNumber ofstrokesAspirin alone1649206Aspirin + dipyridamole1650157

The study was a randomized comparative experiment.

(a) Is there a significant difference in the proportion of strokes between these two treatments? Carry out an appropriate test to help answer this question.

(b) Describe a Type I and a Type II error in this setting. Which is more serious? Explain

A researcher wants to determine whether or not a five-week crash diet is effective over a long period of time. A random sample of 15 dieters is selected. Each person's weight is recorded before starting the diet and one year after it is concluded. Based on the data shown below (weight in pounds), can we conclude that the diet has a long-term effect, that is, that dieters managed to not regain the weight they lost? Include appropriate statistical evidence to justify your answer.

Coaching and SAT scores (10.2) What we really want to know is whether coached students improve more than uncoached students and whether any advantage is large enough to be worth paying for. Use the information above to answer these questions:

(a) Is there good evidence that coached students gained more on average than uncoached students? Carry out a significance test to answer this question.

(b) How much more do coach students gain on the average? Construct and interpret a 99% confidence interval.

(c) Based on your work, what is your opinion: do you think coaching courses are worth paying for?

Many new products introduced into the market are targeted toward children. The choice behavior of children with regard to new products is of particular interest to companies that design marketing strategies for these products. As part of one study, randomly selected children in different age groups were compared on their ability to sort new products into the correct product category (milk or juice). Here are some of the data:

Age groupNNumber who sorted correctly4- to 5-year-olds50106- to 7-year-olds5328

Are these two age groups equally skilled at sorting? Use information from the Minitab output below to support your answer.

Computer gaming Do experienced computer game players earn higher scores when they play with someone present to cheer them on or when they play alone? Fifty teenagers who are experienced at playing a particular computer game have volunteered for a study . We randomly assign 25of them to play the game alone and the other 25to play the game with a supporter present. Each player’s score is recorded.

(a) Is this a problem with comparing means or comparing proportions? Explain.

(b) What type of study design is being used to produce data?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.