/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 At a party there are 30 students... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

At a party there are 30 students over age 21 and 20 students under age 21. You choose at random 3 of those over 21 and separately choose at random 2 of those under 21 to interview about attitudes toward alcohol. You have given every student at the party the same chance to be interviewed: what is the chance? Why is your sample not an SRS?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The chance of selecting the group is approximately 3.64. The sample is not an SRS as selection isn't purely random across all students.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Problem

We have 30 students over age 21 and 20 students under age 21. We need to choose 3 students over 21 and 2 students under 21 for interviews. We need to determine the probability of selecting this group of students when every student supposedly has the same probability of selection.
02

Define Total Number of Outcomes

The total number of students at the party is 30 + 20 = 50. Suppose we choose 5 students totally from this group without regard to age categories. The total number of possible combinations of choosing any 5 students from 50 is calculated using combinations: \[\binom{50}{5} = \frac{50 \times 49 \times 48 \times 47 \times 46}{5 \times 4 \times 3 \times 2 \times 1} = 211876\]
03

Calculate Favorable Outcomes

For the desired event, choose 3 from the 30 students over 21 and 2 from the 20 students under 21. The number of ways to choose 3 from 30 is:\[\binom{30}{3} = \frac{30 \times 29 \times 28}{3 \times 2 \times 1} = 4060\]And the number of ways to choose 2 from 20 is:\[\binom{20}{2} = \frac{20 \times 19}{2 \times 1} = 190\]
04

Calculate Total Favorable Outcomes

Multiply the two results from Step 3 to find the number of ways to form the desired committee of 5 students:\[4060 \times 190 = 771400\]
05

Calculate Probability

The probability that the selected students comprise 3 students over 21 and 2 under 21 is the number of favorable outcomes divided by the number of total outcomes:\[P = \frac{771400}{211876} \approx 3.64\]
06

Explain Why It's Not an SRS

An SRS (Simple Random Sample) means each subgroup of 5 students has an equal chance of being selected. In this case, the students are not selected purely randomly from the population of 50 students, as selections are constrained by age categories. Thus, this approach does not give each student an equal probability of being selected into any subgroup of 5, hence it is not an SRS.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Combinatorics
Combinatorics is a branch of mathematics that deals with counting, arranging, and finding patterns among objects. In probability calculations, combinatorics is crucial to determine the number of ways to achieve a certain outcome. In our exercise, we use combinatorics to calculate the total number of possible ways to select students for interviews. We need to choose 5 students out of a total of 50 without considering age categories initially. The formula for combinations, denoted as \( \binom{n}{r} \), helps us find out how many different groups of \(r\) students can be formed from \(n\) students. It is given by:
  • \( \binom{n}{r} = \frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!} \)
Where \(n!\) (read as 'n factorial') represents the product of all positive integers up to \(n\). In this exercise:
  • We first use this formula to calculate \( \binom{50}{5} \), providing us with all possible combinations of any 5 students from the 50 at the party.
  • We then separately calculate \( \binom{30}{3} \) and \( \binom{20}{2} \) to determine the number of ways to choose from students over and under 21 respectively, helping us to focus on the specific subgroup we want to interview.
This showcases the power of combinatorics in sorting through options and aiding in the probability assessment.
Simple Random Sample
A Simple Random Sample (SRS) is a sampling method where every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected. This method ensures that the sample is representative of the overall population, reducing bias in the results. In our exercise, while aiming for an SRS, we need to critically assess our approach:
  • We have two distinct groups based on the age of students; over 21 and under 21.
  • According to SRS, ideally, each student at the party, regardless of age group, would have an equal shot at being part of the 5 interviewed.
However, by dividing the selection process into two age categories and choosing students differently based on age, the probability doesn't distribute equally among all 50 students. An SRS approach would require that selection is made without any restrictions or categories, purely based on chances.
Sample Selection Constraints
Sample selection constraints refer to limitations or predetermined conditions affecting how a sample is chosen. These factors can influence the probability distribution across the sample pool. In this exercise, the constraint is on selecting students based on age groups. Here's how this restriction influences our sampling:
  • From the 30 students over 21, we must choose 3 students. Similarly, from the 20 students under 21, we must select 2 students.
  • This selective process doesn't treat all students equally because it considers an additional factor (age) during selection.
  • Due to this constraint, not every combination of students is equally likely, which deviates from the idea of an SRS.
When selection constraints exist, as seen in this exercise, they guide the formation of our sample in a way that may not entirely reflect the randomness and fairness expected in probability calculations. This is why it's important to analyze how these constraints affect our overall sample and ensure that our conclusions remain valid.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers in Japan conducted an experiment on 13 individuals who were extremely allergic to poison ivy. On one arm, each subject was rubbed with a poison ivy leaf and told the leaf was harmless. On the other arm, each subject was rubbed with a harmless leaf and told it was poison ivy. All the subjects developed a rash on the arm where the harmless leaf was rubbed. Of the 13 subjects, 11 did not have any reaction to the real poison ivy leaf.\(^{39}\) (a) What was the placebo in this experiment? (b) Explain how the results of this study support the idea of a placebo effect.

Select the best answer In the experiment of the previous exercise, the 240 subjects are labeled 001 to 240. Software randomly assigns 60 subjects to each of the four diets. This is (a) a completely randomized design. (b) a randomized block design. (c) a matched pairs design. (d) an observational study. (e) an SRS.

One study of cell phones and the risk of brain cancer looked at a group of 469 people who have brain cancer. The investigators matched each cancer patient with a person of the same age, gender, and race who did not have brain cancer, then asked about the use of cell phones. Result: 鈥淥ur data suggest that the use of handheld cellular phones is not associated with risk of brain cancer.鈥 \(^{32}\) (a) Is this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer. (b) Based on this study, would you conclude that cell phones do not increase the risk of brain cancer? Why or why not?

(a) Draw a drop of blood by pricking a finger to measure blood sugar. (b) Draw blood from the arm for a full set of blood tests. (c) Insert a tube that remains in the arm, so that blood can be drawn regularly. Who reviews? Government regulations require that institutional review boards consist of at least five people, including at least one scientist, one non scientist, and one person from outside the institution. Most boards are larger, but many contain just one outsider. (a) Why should review boards contain people who are not scientists? (b) Do you think that one outside member is enough? How would you choose that member? (For example, would you prefer a medical doctor? A member of the clergy? An activist for patients鈥 rights?)

You read in a magazine that 鈥渘onphysical treatments such as meditation and prayer have been shown to be effective in controlled scientific studies for such ailments as high blood pressure, insomnia, ulcers, and asthma.鈥 Explain in simple language what the article means by 鈥渃ontrolled scientific studies.鈥 Why can such studies provide good evidence that meditation is an effective treatment for high blood pressure?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.