/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 66 You read in a magazine that 鈥渘... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

You read in a magazine that 鈥渘onphysical treatments such as meditation and prayer have been shown to be effective in controlled scientific studies for such ailments as high blood pressure, insomnia, ulcers, and asthma.鈥 Explain in simple language what the article means by 鈥渃ontrolled scientific studies.鈥 Why can such studies provide good evidence that meditation is an effective treatment for high blood pressure?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Controlled scientific studies use randomization, control groups, and sometimes placebos to test treatments like meditation, ensuring reliable and unbiased results. This rigorous approach helps determine meditation's effectiveness for conditions like high blood pressure.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Controlled Scientific Study

In a controlled scientific study, researchers carefully plan and conduct experiments to test a hypothesis under specific conditions. These studies have strict guidelines and controls to ensure that the results are reliable and not affected by outside factors.
02

Randomization and Control Groups

To determine treatment effectiveness, researchers use randomization. Participants are randomly assigned to either the treatment group, receiving meditation, or a control group, not receiving meditation. Randomization helps eliminate bias and ensures that any differences in outcomes are due to the treatment itself.
03

Use of Placebo

Sometimes, a placebo is used with the control group to mimic the treatment without having any therapeutic effect. This helps to further ensure that the observed effects are due to the treatment and not to participants' expectations of improvement.
04

Measuring Outcomes

Researchers will measure specific outcomes, such as blood pressure levels, at the start and during or after the intervention. The data from both groups (treatment and control) are compared to determine the effect of meditation.
05

Replicability and Peer Review

Controlled scientific studies are often reviewed and replicated by other scientists to confirm the results. Only if the results are repeatable and verified through multiple studies do they gain scientific credibility.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomization
Randomization is a crucial process in controlled scientific studies that helps ensure the validity of an experiment. When participants are involved in a study, researchers randomly assign them to either the treatment group or the control group. This means if you were part of such a study, you might have a chance to receive meditation as treatment, or you might not.

The reason for randomization is to eliminate bias, which means each participant has an equal chance of being allocated to any given group. This fairness in distribution helps ensure that any differences observed in outcomes are primarily due to the treatment being studied, rather than other external factors or pre-existing differences.
  • Random Assignment: Ensures equal chance for all participants to be in treatment or control group.
  • Eliminates Bias: Helps in observing the true effects of the treatment alone.
Control Groups
Control groups act as a benchmark for comparison in scientific studies. If you鈥檙e examining a treatment, like meditation, you need to know its effects against something. That鈥檚 the role of a control group. These groups do not receive the treatment being tested 鈥 in this case, meditation.

By having a control group, scientists can see if changes in outcomes, like lowered blood pressure, are due to the meditation itself rather than some other factor. Control groups are essential because they allow for reliable comparison.
  • Benchmark: Control groups serve as a reference point in studies.
  • Comparison: Helps evaluate the actual impact of the treatment.
Placebo Effect
The placebo effect is a fascinating phenomenon where participants experience a perceived improvement in their condition, despite only receiving a placebo 鈥 a non-active treatment.

In control groups, a placebo might be used to test if any improvement is due to the participant's belief in the treatment rather than the treatment itself, like meditation. For instance, in a meditation study, if people in the control group who received a placebo think they are being treated and feel better, this helps researchers parse out true effects from psychological ones.
  • Psychological Impact: Improvement due to belief rather than the actual treatment.
  • Comparison Tool: Distinguishes between psychological and physiological effects.
Measuring Outcomes
Measuring outcomes is vital to understand the effectiveness of a treatment. In scientific studies, precise measurements tell us whether a treatment like meditation is actually helping improve conditions, such as lowering blood pressure.

Researchers collect data on specific health outcomes before, during, and after the intervention. By comparing the data from treatment and control groups, they can assess the actual impact of meditation.
  • Data Collection: Key health metrics are recorded throughout the study.
  • Comparison: Outcome data from both groups are analyzed for differences.
Replicability and Peer Review
Replicability and peer review are the backbone of scientific credibility. Once a study is completed, other scientists may try to replicate the experiment using similar methods to see if they get the same results.

This process of replication ensures that results are not just a one-time occurrence, but consistent across different scenarios. Peer review involves other experts evaluating the study to verify the findings. Studies that are both replicable and peer-reviewed are considered much more trustworthy.
  • Consistency: Repeated results across studies add to the scientific validity.
  • Quality Check: Peer review ensures the study meets scientific standards.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

One study of cell phones and the risk of brain cancer looked at a group of 469 people who have brain cancer. The investigators matched each cancer patient with a person of the same age, gender, and race who did not have brain cancer, then asked about the use of cell phones. Result: 鈥淥ur data suggest that the use of handheld cellular phones is not associated with risk of brain cancer.鈥 \(^{32}\) (a) Is this an observational study or an experiment? Justify your answer. (b) Based on this study, would you conclude that cell phones do not increase the risk of brain cancer? Why or why not?

Biological measurements on the same species often follow a Normal distribution quite closely. The weights of seeds of a variety of winged bean are approximately Normal with mean 525 milligrams (mg) and standard deviation 110 mg. (a) What percent of seeds weigh more than 500 mg? Show your method. (b) If we discard the lightest 10% of these seeds, what is the smallest weight among the remaining seeds? Show your method. Exercises 100 and 101 refer to the following setting. A researcher studied a group of identical twins who had been separated and adopted at birth. In each case, one twin (Twin A) was adopted by a low-income family and the other (Twin \(\mathrm{B}\) ) by a high-income family. Both twins were given an \(\mathrm{IQ}\) test as adults. Here are their scores: \(^{47}\) Twin A: 120 99 99 94 111 97 99 94 104 114 113 100 Twin B: 128 104 108 100 116 105 100 100 103 124 114 112

Researchers on aging proposed to investigate the effect of supplemental health services on the quality of life of older people. Eligible patients on the rolls of a large medical clinic were to be randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. The treatment group would be offered hearing aids, dentures, transportation, and other services not available without charge to the control group. The review board felt that providing these services to some but not other persons in the same institution raised ethical questions. Do you agree?

Identify the experimental units or subjects, the explanatory variables (factors), the treatments, and the response variables. A maker of fabric for clothing is set- ting up a new line to 鈥渇inish鈥 the raw fabric. The line will use either metal rollers or natural-bristle rollers to raise the surface of the fabric; a dyeing-cycle time of either 30 or 40 minutes; and a temperature of either \(150^{\circ}\) or \(175^{\circ}\) Celsius. An experiment will compare all combinations of these choices. Three specimens of fabric will be subjected to each treatment and scored for quality.

Canada requires that cars be equipped with 鈥渄aytime running lights,鈥 headlights that automatically come on at a low level when the car is started. Some manufacturers are now equipping cars sold in the United States with running lights. Will running lights reduce accidents by making cars more visible? An experiment conducted in a driving simulator suggests that the answer may be 鈥淵es.鈥 What concerns would you have about generalizing the results of such an experiment?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.