/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Fear of crime The elderly fear c... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Fear of crime The elderly fear crime more than younger people, even though they are less likely to be victims of crime. One study recruited separate random samples of 56 black women and 63 black men over the age of 65 from Atlantic City, New Jersey. Of the women, 27 said they 鈥渇elt vulnerable鈥 to crime; 46 of the men said this.\(^{12}\) (a) Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the difference in population proportions (men minus women). (b) Does your interval from part (a) give convincing evidence of a difference between the population proportions? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
(0.0961, 0.4001); yes, there is a significant difference.

Step by step solution

01

Determine Sample Proportions

Calculate the sample proportions for both black women and black men. The sample proportion for black women \( \hat{p}_1 \) is calculated as \( \frac{27}{56} \approx 0.4821 \). The sample proportion for black men \( \hat{p}_2 \) is calculated as \( \frac{46}{63} \approx 0.7302 \).
02

Calculate Standard Error of Difference

Use the formula for the standard error (SE) of the difference in sample proportions: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}_1(1-\hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p}_2(1-\hat{p}_2)}{n_2}} \] Substituting the given values, \( n_1 = 56 \) and \( n_2 = 63 \), we find \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{0.4821 \times 0.5179}{56} + \frac{0.7302 \times 0.2698}{63}} \approx 0.0924 \].
03

Find the Critical Value

Since we're constructing a 90% confidence interval, we find the critical value \( z^* \) for a confidence level of 90%. Using a standard normal distribution table, \( z^* \approx 1.645 \).
04

Calculate Confidence Interval

The confidence interval is given by: \[ (\hat{p}_2 - \hat{p}_1) \pm z^* \times SE \] Substituting the values we have: \( \hat{p}_2 - \hat{p}_1 = 0.7302 - 0.4821 = 0.2481 \). So, the interval is \[ 0.2481 \pm 1.645 \times 0.0924 \] which calculates to \[ 0.2481 \pm 0.1520 = (0.0961, 0.4001) \].
05

Interpret the Confidence Interval

The 90% confidence interval for the difference in population proportions of feelings of vulnerability to crime between men and women is \((0.0961, 0.4001)\). This interval suggests that the difference in the probability that a man feels vulnerable to crime compared to a woman is between 9.61% and 40.01%.
06

Conclusion on Evidence of Difference

Since the entire confidence interval for the difference in population proportions \((0.0961, 0.4001)\) is above zero, we have convincing evidence that the proportion of men who feel vulnerable to crime is significantly higher than that of women.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Population Proportions
Population proportions represent the ratio of individuals in a specific group who possess a certain characteristic. Understanding this concept is critical when comparing two different groups in a sample.
In our exercise, we are comparing two groups: black women and black men over the age of 65 in Atlantic City. Specifically, we want to know what portion of each group "feels vulnerable" to crime.
  • The sample proportion for black women, denoted by \( \hat{p}_1 \), is approximately 0.4821. This means about 48.21% of the sampled women felt vulnerable to crime.
  • The sample proportion for black men, denoted by \( \hat{p}_2 \), is approximately 0.7302, or about 73.02% of the men felt vulnerable.
By calculating these proportions, we lay the groundwork for further analysis like constructing confidence intervals.
Standard Error
The standard error (SE) measures the variability or dispersion of the sample estimate and helps us understand how much the estimated proportions might differ from the true population proportions. It is crucial in determining how precise our estimates are.
The formula used in our exercise is:
  • Standard Error for difference in proportions: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}_1(1-\hat{p}_1)}{n_1} + \frac{\hat{p}_2(1-\hat{p}_2)}{n_2}} \]
Where \( n_1 = 56 \) and \( n_2 = 63 \), are the sample sizes for women and men, respectively.
Using this formula, we calculate the standard error to be approximately 0.0924. This value shows us the expected variability in the difference between the two population proportions if multiple samples were taken.
Critical Value
The critical value is a factor used to calculate the margin of error in a confidence interval. It is derived from the z-distribution, which assumes a normal distribution of the sample data.
For a 90% confidence level, a standard z-table or calculator is used to determine the critical value. In this instance, the critical value \( z^* \) is about 1.645.
The critical value tells us how many standard deviations away from the mean our bounds should be. It adjusts the width of the confidence interval, providing a range in which we can be fairly certain the true difference in population proportions falls. This concept helps to link the statistical theory with real-world data interpretation.
Interpretation of Results
Interpreting results is the final, yet crucial stage of statistical analysis. It involves understanding what the calculated confidence interval actually means in context.
Our confidence interval for the difference in population proportions is \((0.0961, 0.4001)\). This means we are 90% confident that the true difference in the proportion of men and women who "feel vulnerable" to crime lies between 9.61% and 40.01%.
  • The fact that this entire interval is above zero suggests that there is a significant difference between the two groups with regard to feeling vulnerable to crime.
  • This implies that, not only are men more likely to feel vulnerable, but we also have sufficient statistical evidence to back this claim based on the data.
Interpreting the results helps us decide if the hypothesis is statistically significant and provides insights that can influence further research or policy-making.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Who owns iPods? As part of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, researchers surveyed a random sample of 800 teens and a separate random sample of 400 young adults. For the teens, 79% said that they own an iPod or MP3 player. For the young adults, this figure was 67%. Is there a significant difference between the population proportions? State appropriate hypotheses for a significance test to answer this question. Define any parameters you use.

Listening to rap Is rap music more popular among young blacks than among young whites? A sample survey compared 634 randomly chosen blacks aged 15 to 25 with 567 randomly selected whites in the same age group. It found that 368 of the blacks and 130 of the whites listened to rap music every day.\(^{10}\) Construct and interpret a 95% confidence interval for the difference between the proportions of black and white young people who listen to rap every day.

Web business You want to compare the daily sales for two different designs of Web pages for your Internet business. You assign the next 60 days to either Design A or Design B, 30 days to each. (a) Describe how you would assign the days for Design A and Design B using the partial line of random digits provided below. Then use your plan to select the first three days for using Design A. Show your method clearly on your paper. $$24005 \qquad 52114 \qquad 26224 \qquad 39078$$ (b) Would you use a one-sided or a two-sided significance test for this problem? Explain your choice. Then set up appropriate hypotheses. (c) If you plan to use Table B to calculate the P-value, what are the degrees of freedom? (d) The t statistic for comparing the mean sales is 2.06. Using Table B, what P-value would you report? What would you conclude?

Sleep deprivation Does sleep deprivation linger for more than a day? Researchers designed a study using 21 volunteer subjects between the ages of 18 and 25. All 21 participants took a computer-based visual discrimination test at the start of the study. Then the subjects were randomly assigned into two groups. The 11 subjects in one group, D, were deprived of sleep for an entire night in a laboratory setting. The 10 subjects in the other group, A, were allowed unrestricted sleep for the night. Both groups were allowed as much sleep as they wanted for the next two nights. On Day 4, all the subjects took the same visual discrimination test on the computer. Researchers recorded the improvement in time (measured in milliseconds) from Day 1 to Day 4 on the test for each subject.\(^{41}\) We used Fathom software to randomly reassign the 21 subjects to the two groups 1000 times, assuming the treatment received doesn鈥檛 affect each individual鈥檚 time improvement on the test. The dotplot shows the approximate randomization distribution of \(\overline{x}_{\mathrm{A}}-\overline{x}_{\mathrm{D}}\). (a) Explain why the researchers didn鈥檛 let the subjects choose whether to be in the sleep deprivation group or the unrestricted sleep group. (b) In the actual experiment, \(\overline{x}_{\mathrm{A}}-\overline{x}_{\mathrm{D}}=15.92 .\) This value is marked with a blue line in the figure. What conclusion would you draw? Justify your answer with appropriate evidence. (c) Based on your conclusion in part (b), could you have made a Type I error or a Type II error? Justify your answer.

Exercises 33 and 34 refer to the following setting. Thirty randomly selected seniors at Council High School were asked to report the age (in years) and mileage of their main vehicles. Here is a scatterplot of the data: We used Minitab to perform a least-squares regression analysis for these data. Part of the computer output from this regression is shown below. Predictor \(\quad\) coef \(\quad\) stdev \(\quad\) t-ratio \(\quad \mathrm{P}\) Constant \(-13832 \qquad 8773 \qquad-1.58 \qquad 0.126\) Age \(\quad 14954 \qquad 1546 \qquad 9.67 \quad 0.000\) \(s=22723 \qquad R-s q=77.08 \qquad R-s q(a d j)=76.18\) Drive my car (3.2, 4.3) (a) Explain what the value of r2 tells you about how well the least-squares line fits the data. (b) The mean age of the students鈥 cars in the sample was x 8 years. Find the mean mileage of the cars in the sample. Show your work. (c) Interpret the value of s in the context of this setting. (d) Would it be reasonable to use the least-squares line to predict a car鈥檚 mileage from its age for a Council High School teacher? Justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.