/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 32 Multiple choice: Select the best... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Multiple choice: Select the best answer for Exercises 29 to 32. A sample survey interviews SRSs of 500 female college students and 550 male college students. Each student is asked whether he or she worked for pay last summer. In all, 410 of the women and 484 of the men say 鈥淵es.鈥 Exercises 29 to 31 are based on this survey. In an experiment to learn whether Substance M can help restore memory, the brains of 20 rats were treated to damage their memories. The rats were trained to run a maze. After a day, 10 rats (determined at random) were given M and 7 of them succeeded in the maze. Only 2 of the 10 control rats were successful. The two-sample z test for 鈥渘o difference鈥 against 鈥渁 significantly higher proportion of the M group succeeds鈥 (a) gives \(z=2.25, P<0.02\) (b) gives \(z=2.60, P<0.005\) (c) gives \(z=2.25, P<0.04\) but not \(<0.02\) (d) should not be used because the Random condition is violated. (e) should not be used because the Normal condition is violated.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Option (c) gives the closest z-value result based on calculations.

Step by step solution

01

Define the Hypotheses

First, define the null and alternative hypotheses for the two-sample z test. The null hypothesis \( H_0 \) is that there is no difference in the proportions of successful maze-running rats between the treatment and control groups. The alternative hypothesis \( H_a \) is that the proportion in the M group is significantly higher.
02

Identify Sample Proportions

Calculate the sample proportions for both groups. For the M group: \( \hat{p}_1 = \frac{7}{10} = 0.7 \). For the control group: \( \hat{p}_2 = \frac{2}{10} = 0.2 \).
03

Calculate the Pooled Proportion

The pooled proportion \( \hat{p} \) is found using the formula \[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2} = \frac{7 + 2}{10 + 10} = 0.45 \].
04

Calculate the Standard Error

Compute the standard error of the difference in proportions. \[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p}) \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)} = \sqrt{0.45(1-0.45)\left(\frac{1}{10} + \frac{1}{10}\right)} = 0.213 \]
05

Compute the Z-statistic

The z-statistic is computed by \[ z = \frac{\hat{p}_1 - \hat{p}_2}{SE} = \frac{0.7 - 0.2}{0.213} = 2.35 \].
06

Decide on the Best Answer

Based on the z statistic, a z value of 2.35 does not precisely match any option, but closest realistic comparisons are options (a) \( z=2.25, P<0.02\) and (c) \( z=2.25, P<0.04\) but not \(<0.02\). The latter matches the level of certainty around the computed z.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sample Proportions
In statistics, sample proportions help us to understand the characteristics of a smaller, more manageable group of data, which is representative of a larger group or population. In the given exercise, the sample proportions are vital as they summarize how many rats were successful within each group: treatment and control.
  • The proportion for the M group is calculated by dividing the number of successes (7 rats) by the total number of M-treated rats (10). So, the sample proportion for this group is 0.7.
  • Similarly, the proportion for the control group is calculated by dividing the number of successes (2 rats) by the total number in the control group (10), giving a sample proportion of 0.2.
These proportions are the foundation for conducting a two-sample z test, as they provide the numerical summary needed to explore differences in successes between the groups.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis (\( H_0 \)) is a crucial concept in hypothesis testing, representing a statement that there is no effect or difference. It is the default assumption that any observed difference is due to sampling or experimental error rather than a real effect.
In this exercise, the null hypothesis posits that there is no difference in the success proportions between the rats treated with Substance M and the control rats. Mathematically, this can be stated as: \( H_0: p_1 = p_2 \), where \( p_1 \) and \( p_2 \) are the population proportions of successful maze runs by M-treated and control rats, respectively.Understanding this hypothesis helps in determining if any calculated differences can be viewed as statistically significant or just a result of chance.
Alternative Hypothesis
Unlike the null hypothesis, the alternative hypothesis (\( H_a \)) suggests a specific difference between groups. It is what researchers aim to support - the change or difference they want to prove.
In the context of the exercise, the alternative hypothesis is that the success proportion for the M-treated rats is higher than that of the control group. This can be written as: \( H_a: p_1 > p_2 \). Here, \( p_1 \) and \( p_2 \) represent the population proportions of rats that successfully ran the maze in M-treated and control groups, respectively.The alternative hypothesis guides the direction of the test, indicating that we're particularly interested in finding evidence that supports a higher success rate in the M group.
Pooled Proportion
The pooled proportion is a combined estimate of the success observations from both groups, calculated to provide a weighted average of the proportions.
It offers a single proportion under the assumption that there is no difference between groups, and it's utilized in calculating the standard error required for the z-test.
The formula to find the pooled proportion \( \hat{p} \) in the exercise is:\[ \hat{p} = \frac{x_1 + x_2}{n_1 + n_2}\]where \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \) are the number of successes in each group, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are the total number of observations in each. For this case, \( \hat{p} = 0.45 \), indicating that 45% of all rats combined were successful.This pooled proportion is then used to understand the expected standard error if there were no true difference.
Standard Error
Standard error provides insight into how much the sample proportion can be expected to fluctuate due to random sampling. It's essential in determining the reliability of our test results.
In this exercise, the standard error of the difference between two proportions (\( SE \)) is calculated using the formula:\[ SE = \sqrt{\hat{p}(1-\hat{p}) \left(\frac{1}{n_1} + \frac{1}{n_2}\right)}\]where \( \hat{p} \) is the pooled proportion, and \( n_1 \) and \( n_2 \) are sample sizes of the two groups.
Calculating standard error helps assess if the observed differences between sample proportions can be attributed to actual differences in population proportions, considering sampling variability.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a term that reflects the confidence with which we can reject the null hypothesis. A result is statistically significant if observed differences are unlikely due to chance alone.
In the exercise, once the z-statistic is calculated (here it is 2.35), it is compared against a standard normal distribution to determine the associated p-value.
The p-value indicates the probability of observing the test results under the null hypothesis. If this value is below a predetermined significance level (commonly 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected in favor of the alternative.
A small p-value in this case suggests the treatment group performs better than the control, indicating Memory-enhancing benefits of Substance M. Statistical significance provides a structured way to support or refute the initial hypothesis with calculated confidence.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Paired or unpaired? In each of the following settings, decide whether you should use paired \(t\) procedures or two-sample t procedures to perform inference. Explain your choice.\(^{43}\) (a) To compare the average weight gain of pigs fed two different rations, nine pairs of pigs were used. The pigs in each pair were littermates. A coin toss was used to decide which pig in each pair got Ration A and which got Ration B. (b) A random sample of college professors is taken. We wish to compare the average salaries of male and female teachers. (c) To test the effects of a new fertilizer, 100 plots are treated with the new fertilizer, and 100 plots are treated with another fertilizer. A computer鈥檚 random number generator is used to determine which plots get which fertilizer.

What鈥檚 wrong? A driving school wants to find out which of its two instructors is more effective at preparing students to pass the state鈥檚 driver鈥檚 license exam. An incoming class of 100 students is randomly assigned to two groups, each of size 50. One group is taught by Instructor A; the other is taught by Instructor B. At the end of the course, 30 of Instructor A鈥檚 students and 22 of Instructor B鈥檚 students pass the state exam. Do these results give convincing evidence that Instructor A is more effective? Min Jae carried out the significance test shown below to answer this question. Unfortunately, he made some mistakes along the way. Identify as many mistakes as you can, and tell how to correct each one. State: I want to perform a test of $$H_{0} : p_{1}-p_{2}=0$$ $$H_{a} : p_{1}-p_{2}>0$$ where \(p_{1}=\) the proportion of Instructor A's students that passed the state exam and \(p_{2}=\) the proportion of Instructor B's students that passed the state exam. Since no significance level was stated, I'll use \(\sigma=0.05\) Plan: If conditions are met, I'll do a two-sample \(z\) test for comparing two proportions. \(\bullet\) Random The data came from two random samples of 50 students. \(\bullet\) Normal The counts of successes and failures in the two groups - \(30,20,22\) , and \(28-\) are all at least \(10 .\) \(\bullet\) Independent There are at least 1000 students who take this driving school's class. Do: From the data, \(\hat{p}_{1}=\frac{20}{50}=0.40\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=\frac{30}{50}=0.60 .\) So the pooled proportion of successes is $$\hat{p}_{C}=\frac{22+30}{50+50}=0.52$$ \(\bullet\) Test statistic $$z=\frac{(0.40-0.60)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{0.52(0.48)}{100}+\frac{0.52(0.48)}{100}}}=-2.83$$ Conclude: The P-value, \(0.9977,\) is greater than \(\alpha=\) \(0.05,\) so we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is not convincing evidence that Instructor A's pass rate is higher than Instructor B's.

Is red wine better than white wine? Observational studies suggest that moderate use of alcohol by adults reduces heart attacks and that red wine may have special benefits. One reason may be that red wine contains polyphenols, substances that do good things to cholesterol in the blood and so may reduce the risk of heart attacks. In an experiment, healthy men were assigned at random to drink half a bottle of either red or white wine each day for two weeks. The level of polyphenols in their blood was measured before and after the two-week period. Here are the percent changes in level for the subjects in both groups:\(^{31}\) Red wine: 3.58 .1\(\quad 7.44 .0 \quad 0.74 .98 .4 \quad 7.05 .5\) White wine: \(3.1 \quad 0.5-3.8\) 4.1 \(-0.62 .7 \quad 1.9-5.9 \quad 0.1\) (a) A Fathom dotplot of the data is shown below. Use the graph to answer these questions: \(\bullet\) Are the centers of the two groups similar or different? Explain. \(\bullet\) Are the spreads of the two groups similar or different? Explain. (b) Construct and interpret a 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean percent change in polyphenol levels for the red wine and white wine treatments. (c) Does the interval in part (b) suggest that red wine is more effective than white wine? Explain.

Who talks more鈥攎en or women? Researchers equipped random samples of 56 male and 56 female students from a large university with a small device that secretly records sound for a random 30 seconds during each 12.5-minute period over two days. Then they counted the number of words spoken by each subject during each recording period and, from this, estimated how many words per day each subject speaks. The female estimates had a mean of 16,177 words per day with a standard deviation of 7520 words per day. For the male estimates, the mean was 16,569 and the standard deviation was 9108. (a) Do these data provide convincing evidence of a difference in the average number of words spoken in a day by male and female students at this university? Carry out an appropriate test to support your answer. (b) Interpret the P-value from part (a) in the context of this study.

Exercises 33 and 34 refer to the following setting. Thirty randomly selected seniors at Council High School were asked to report the age (in years) and mileage of their main vehicles. Here is a scatterplot of the data: We used Minitab to perform a least-squares regression analysis for these data. Part of the computer output from this regression is shown below. Predictor \(\quad\) coef \(\quad\) stdev \(\quad\) t-ratio \(\quad \mathrm{P}\) Constant \(-13832 \qquad 8773 \qquad-1.58 \qquad 0.126\) Age \(\quad 14954 \qquad 1546 \qquad 9.67 \quad 0.000\) \(s=22723 \qquad R-s q=77.08 \qquad R-s q(a d j)=76.18\) Drive my car (3.2, 4.3) (a) Explain what the value of r2 tells you about how well the least-squares line fits the data. (b) The mean age of the students鈥 cars in the sample was x 8 years. Find the mean mileage of the cars in the sample. Show your work. (c) Interpret the value of s in the context of this setting. (d) Would it be reasonable to use the least-squares line to predict a car鈥檚 mileage from its age for a Council High School teacher? Justify your answer.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.