/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Does This Really Need to Be Revi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Does This Really Need to Be Reviewed? A college professor would like to conduct a taste test of a new breakfast cereal that contains only wholesome ingredients, such as whole grains and dried fruit, without additives. Should he seek institutional review board approval before proceeding? Discuss.

Short Answer

Expert verified
IRB approval may not be necessary due to minimal risks, but check institutional policies.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Nature of the Study

The first step is to understand the nature of the study being conducted by the professor. In this case, the study involves a taste test for a new breakfast cereal composed of wholesome ingredients. The main activity is the tasting of cereal, and the demographic involved is likely students or general consumers of the cereal.
02

Identifying Potential Risks

Consider any potential risks involved in the study. Generally, a taste test of a food product that is made with wholesome, non-allergenic ingredients and without additives poses minimal risks. The primary concern would be ensuring that participants do not have allergies to the ingredients used.
03

Review Criteria for Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Next, we need to evaluate the criteria for when an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval is necessary. IRB review is typically required for research that involves human subjects, particularly when there are significant potential risks or ethical concerns, or when there's a chance of causing harm to the participants.
04

Assessing the Need for IRB Approval

Since the study involves human subjects only in the context of taste-testing a food product with minimal risks, the nature of the study might not necessitate IRB approval. However, the professor should consider institutional policies, as some institutions require IRB oversight for all human subject research projects.
05

Conclusion Based on Analysis

Based on the low-risk nature of a taste test using natural ingredients, the requirement for IRB approval is likely not mandatory from an ethical standpoint. However, checking institutional requirements is important as policies can vary.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ethical Considerations in Research
When undertaking any research project, ethical considerations are crucial, as they serve to protect the well-being of all participants involved. Ethics in research ensures that the integrity of the scientific investigation is maintained and the dignity of participants is respected. Here are some key ethical principles that apply:
  • **Informed Consent:** Participants should be fully informed about the nature, purpose, and potential impacts of the study. This ensures they agree to partake in the research with full knowledge of what it entails.
  • **Confidentiality:** Any data collected should remain confidential unless participants agree otherwise. This safeguards personal information and respects privacy.
  • **Non-Malfeasance:** Researchers must avoid causing harm to participants. The principle of "do no harm" is foundational, ensuring that no psychological, emotional, or physical damage results from the study.

Factors such as these make ethical considerations in research a cornerstone of any study involving human participants.
Human Subjects Research
Research involving human subjects is a critical area where special ethical guidelines apply to ensure the protection of humans in the investigative process. Human subjects research refers to studies where people participate to provide data through interventions, interactions, or observational methodologies.
Key aspects include ensuring the **voluntary participation** of subjects. It's essential that individuals are willing and not coerced or influenced improperly to take part in the study. Researchers also have a duty to maintain **transparency** about the research objectives, methods, and possible impacts.
  • **Voluntary Participation:** Emphasizes the freedom to join or leave the study at will.
  • **Minimized Risk:** Efforts should be made to reduce any risks these subjects might face during or after the research.

Moreover, specific studies, like taste tests, might seem low-risk but still require ethical scrutiny to ensure no inadvertent harm or ethical breach occurs.
Risk Assessment in Studies
Risk assessment is a critical part of preparing for any research study. It involves identifying, evaluating, and mitigating potential risks to participants. Risk assessment helps determine whether a study requires Institutional Review Board (IRB) review, particularly if it involves human subjects.
There are several components in risk assessment in research:
  • **Identification of Risks:** Recognize both obvious and subtle risks, such as allergies in a food taste-test.
  • **Probability and Impact:** Assess how likely each risk is and the potential severity should it occur.
  • **Risk Mitigation:** Develop strategies to manage and minimize identified risks. For the cereal taste test, confirming non-allergenic ingredients would be a mitigation strategy.

Ultimately, meticulous risk assessment not only prioritizes participant safety but also influences the need for institutional oversight. Ensuring a thorough review process is essential to uphold ethical research standards.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Is consent needed? In which of the following circumstances would you allow collecting personal information without the subjects' consent? (a) A govemment agency takes a random sample of income tax retums to obtain information on the marital status and average income of people who identify themselves as belonging to an ultraconservative political group. Only the marital status and income are recorded from the retums, not the names. (b) A social psychologist attends public meetings of an ultraconservative political group to study the behavior pattems of members. (c) A social psychologist pretends to be converted to membership of an ultraconservative political group and attends private meetings to study the behavior patterns of members.

The Willowbrook hepatitis studies. In the 1960 s, children entering the Willowbrook State School, an institution for the intellectually disabled, were deliberately infected with hepatitis. The researchers argued that almost all children in the institution quickly became infected anyway. The studies showed for the first time that two strains of hepatitis existed. This finding contributed to the development of effective vaccines. Despite these valuable results, the Willowbrook studies are now considered an example of unethical research. Explain why, according to current ethical standards, useful results are not enough to allow a study.

Unequal benefits. Researchers on depression proposed to investigate the effect of supplemental therapy and counseling on the quality of life of adults with depression. Eligible patients on the rolls of a large medical clinic were to be randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. The treatment group would be offered dental care, vision testing, transportation, and other services not available without charge to the control group. The review board felt that providing these services to some but not other persons in the same institution raised ethical questions. Do you agree? Explain your answer.

Anonymous or confidential? The website for STDcheck -com contains the following information about HIV testing. "When you purchase our testing, you are assigned a unique identification code (works in most locations) that allows you to visit the lab without giving your name or filling out any paperwork. With this code, you can track your test and retrieve your results." Does this practice offer anonymity or just confidentiality? Explain your answer.

Deceiving Subjects. Researchers are interested in assessing the \({ }^{\alpha}\) Good Samaritan" behavior of unsuspecting travelers in a subway train. A model, either apparently drunk or carrying a cane, would collapse, and the amount of helpful interventions by travelers would be determined. The results of the experiment determined that people were generally very helpful, although a little more reluctant to help a drunk. Do you think this study is ethically okay? Discuss.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.