/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 14 Anonymous or confidential? The w... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Anonymous or confidential? The website for STDcheck -com contains the following information about HIV testing. "When you purchase our testing, you are assigned a unique identification code (works in most locations) that allows you to visit the lab without giving your name or filling out any paperwork. With this code, you can track your test and retrieve your results." Does this practice offer anonymity or just confidentiality? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The process offers confidentiality, not anonymity.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding Anonymity

Anonymity means that the identity of the person involved is unknown and cannot be traced back to them. In the context of this website, if the testing process is anonymous, then no personal identifying information should be attached to the test process or results.
02

Understanding Confidentiality

Confidentiality means that the person's identity is known but is kept private and protected. Only those who are authorized have access to it, and there are safeguards to protect this information from being disclosed.
03

Analyzing the Testing Procedure

The website states that a unique identification code is assigned to the individual, allowing them to obtain their test without using their name or filling out paperwork. While this suggests that the name isn't used upfront, it does not clarify what happens behind the scenes regarding the storage and handling of identifying information.
04

Determining the Answer

Since the unique identification code is used in lieu of the individual's name, this can feel like anonymity. However, true anonymity means there is no way to link the code back to an individual's identity in any form, even by the company. If the company retains any personal information linked to the code, then the process is better described as maintaining confidentiality.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Anonymity in Data Collection
Anonymity in data collection is a practice where the identities of the individuals providing the data remain completely unknown to the entity collecting it. Imagine a survey that collects feedback without asking for names or contact details. The key feature here is that no one, not even the researchers, can trace the comments or responses back to the person who provided them.
Anonymity can play a crucial role in studies requiring honest and uninhibited responses, such as research in sensitive areas like sexual health or mental well-being. Here are some reasons why anonymity is important:
  • No personal identifiers are collected or retained. This makes it impossible to associate any given response with a particular individual.
  • Participants feel safer and more compelled to provide honest feedback without fear of judgment or repercussions.
  • The process inherently respects user privacy, as there is no need to protect or handle personal data, which doesn’t exist in the first place.
Overall, when executed properly, anonymity ensures that participants' privacy is preserved, even if the data they provide is sensitive or revealing.
Confidentiality vs Anonymity
Confidentiality and anonymity are two concepts that are often confused but have key differences. Let's break down the distinct features of each.

Confidentiality refers to the practice of keeping identifiable data about participants private. While the entity collecting the information knows who the participants are, it takes strong measures to ensure that this information is not disclosed to unauthorized parties.
  • Confidential data is stored and accessed securely to prevent unauthorized access.
  • Only select individuals have permissible access to the information for legitimate research purposes.
  • Participants' identities are protected through encryption and other data protection methodologies.
Anonymity, in contrast, involves collecting data in such a way that no individual data can be connected to specific individuals. This means that even the entity collecting the data doesn’t know the identity of the participants.
  • No personal identifiers are gathered during data collection.
  • Participants are truly shielded from identification, even internally within the organization conducting the study.
Both practices prioritize privacy, but choose different approaches based on the requirements and ethical considerations of the study.
Data Privacy Ethics
Data privacy ethics involves the principles and standards governing the right way to collect, store, and use personal data. As our world becomes more connected, and data more plentiful, maintaining ethical standards in data privacy becomes critically important. Let's explore some ethical considerations in this space.
  • Consent: Always obtain informed consent from participants before collecting any personal data. This ensures that individuals are aware of why and how their data will be used.
  • Minimization: Collect only the data absolutely necessary for the study. This reduces the risk of breaches and ensures minimal impact on privacy should data exposure occur.
  • Transparency: Be open with participants about the data collection processes, how data will be stored, used, and whether it will be shared with others.
  • Data Protection: Implement strong security measures to protect the collected data from breaches and unauthorized access.
  • Accountability: Researchers and organizations must be accountable for ethical failures or misuse of data. They should have processes in place to handle and rectify any such issues.
Ethically managing data privacy demonstrates respect for participants, aligns with legal requirements, and helps build trust between researchers and participants. It’s a key component in conducting responsible statistical studies.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Undue influence? An investigator wants to conduct a funded study of the safety of a vaccine to prevent hepatitis \(\mathrm{C}\) involving prisoners as subjects. Prisoners will receive either vaccine or placebo and then be asked to complete surveys and undergo physical exams to assess for adverse effects. In order to ensure that subjects will report side effects and cooperate with exams, prisoners who are judged by the guards to be most compliant and well- behaved are nonrandomly assigned to the experimental arm; others are assigned to the control (placebo) arm. To encourage participation, prisoners are offered better meals and the opportunity for better-paying jobs in the prison. Are there any aspects of this study that you object to? Why?

The Willowbrook hepatitis studies. In the 1960 s, children entering the Willowbrook State School, an institution for the intellectually disabled, were deliberately infected with hepatitis. The researchers argued that almost all children in the institution quickly became infected anyway. The studies showed for the first time that two strains of hepatitis existed. This finding contributed to the development of effective vaccines. Despite these valuable results, the Willowbrook studies are now considered an example of unethical research. Explain why, according to current ethical standards, useful results are not enough to allow a study.

How many have HIV? Researchers from Yale, working with medical teams in Tanzania, wanted to know how common infection with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, is among pregnant women in that African country. To do this, they planned to test blood samples drawn from pregnant women. Yale's institutional review board insisted that the researchers get the informed consent of each woman and tell her the results of the test. This is the usual procedure in developed nations. The Tanzanian government did not want to tell the women why blood was drawn or tell them the test results. The government feared panic if many people turned out to have an incurable disease for which the country's medical system could not provide care. The study was canceled. Do you think that Yale was right to apply its usual standards for protecting subjects?

Deceiving Subjects. Researchers are interested in assessing the \({ }^{\alpha}\) Good Samaritan" behavior of unsuspecting travelers in a subway train. A model, either apparently drunk or carrying a cane, would collapse, and the amount of helpful interventions by travelers would be determined. The results of the experiment determined that people were generally very helpful, although a little more reluctant to help a drunk. Do you think this study is ethically okay? Discuss.

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. (a) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. (b) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only avallable for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. (c) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.