/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Studying your blood. Long ago, d... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Studying your blood. Long ago, doctors drew a blood specimen from you as part of treating minor anemia. Unknown to you, the sample was stored. Now researchers plan to use stored samples from you and many other people to look for genetic factors that may influence anemia. It is no longer possible to ask your consent. Modem technology can read your entire genetic makeup from the blood sample. (a) Do you think it violates the principle of informed consent to use your blood sample if your name is on it but you were not told that it might be saved and studied later? (b) Suppose that your identity is not attached. The blood sample is known only to come from (say) "a 20-year-old white female being treated for anemia." Is it now okay to use the sample for research? (c) Perhaps we should use biological materials such as blood samples only from patients who have agreed to allow the material to be stored for later use in research. It isn't possable to say in advance what kind of research, so this falls short of the usual standard for informed consent. Is it nonetheless acceptable, given complete confidentialiry and the fact that using the sample can't physically harm the patient?

Short Answer

Expert verified
(a) Yes, it violates informed consent. (b) Generally considered okay due to anonymity. (c) It is acceptable with adequate privacy and consent.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Informed Consent

Informed consent is a process in which a participant agrees to take part in a study with full knowledge of the purpose, benefits, risks, and future use of their contribution. It is key to consider whether participants were informed about the future use of their sample.
02

Analyzing scenario (a)

In scenario (a), the blood sample has your identifiable information, and it was stored without initial consent for future use. This scenario violates the principle of informed consent as it lacks transparency and respect for the donor’s autonomy.
03

Analyzing scenario (b)

For scenario (b), the blood sample is de-identified and only associated with general demographic information. The removal of personal identifiers addresses privacy concerns, and many consider this scenario ethically permissible for research, as it minimizes potential for harm.
04

Evaluating scenario (c)

In scenario (c), advance consent for storage and unspecified future research is proposed. While not specific, obtaining general consent could be deemed acceptable with robust privacy safeguards and considering that it does not pose physical harm, aligning with an ethical balance between research benefits and participant rights.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations are crucial when dealing with any research involving human subjects, especially when it includes sensitive data like genetic information. In research, ethical considerations revolve around the principles of respect, beneficence, and justice. The cornerstone of these principles is informed consent. Participants should be fully aware of what their involvement entails, including potential risks and benefits.
However, ethical challenges arise when research involves previously collected data or biological samples, as consent for future research use might not have been obtained originally.
  • Respect for participants means recognizing their autonomy and allowing them to decide about their involvement once fully informed.
  • Beneficence involves minimizing harm while maximizing potential benefits. This is particularly relevant in genetic research, where the stakes can be personal and profound.
  • Justice requires equitable treatment of all participants, ensuring no group bears undue burden or is unfairly excluded from the benefits of research.
Researchers must constantly evaluate the ethical implications of their work to safeguard participants' rights and maintain public trust.
Genetic Research
Genetic research aims to understand how our genes affect our health and behavior. It can provide insights into genetic diseases and contribute to developing innovative treatments or preventative measures. However, it also raises several ethical and practical concerns.
In the original exercise, researchers wished to utilize stored blood samples to explore genetic links to anemia. This type of research could lead to significant medical advancements. However, it must be conducted carefully to respect participants' rights and address potential ethical issues.
  • Genetic data is unique, as it contains information not only about the individual but also about their biological relatives.
  • There's a risk of misusing genetic data, leading to discrimination or breaches of privacy.
  • Consent must clarify if and how genetic data will be used in future research, even if complete specifics aren't known initially.
By ensuring robust ethical frameworks, researchers can conduct studies that honor the dignity of participants while advancing scientific knowledge.
Privacy in Research
Privacy in research, especially involving genetic information, is of paramount importance. Protecting personal information and maintaining confidentiality are essential to uphold participants' trust and comply with ethical standards.
In the outlined scenarios, the level of privacy influences whether using a blood sample is considered ethically viable. When samples are linked with personal data, as in scenario (a), the privacy risk is higher compared to when samples are anonymized, as in scenario (b).
  • Anonymizing data involves removing identifiers to protect the personal information of participants, minimizing the risk of privacy breaches.
  • Data security measures should be in place to protect stored samples and genetic data from unauthorized access.
  • Participants should be informed about how their data will be protected, fostering a sense of trust and assurance.
Effective privacy practices not only protect individuals but also enhance the integrity and credibility of research efforts.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The Willowbrook hepatitis studies. In the 1960 s, children entering the Willowbrook State School, an institution for the intellectually disabled, were deliberately infected with hepatitis. The researchers argued that almost all children in the institution quickly became infected anyway. The studies showed for the first time that two strains of hepatitis existed. This finding contributed to the development of effective vaccines. Despite these valuable results, the Willowbrook studies are now considered an example of unethical research. Explain why, according to current ethical standards, useful results are not enough to allow a study.

Deceiving Subjects. Researchers are interested in assessing the \({ }^{\alpha}\) Good Samaritan" behavior of unsuspecting travelers in a subway train. A model, either apparently drunk or carrying a cane, would collapse, and the amount of helpful interventions by travelers would be determined. The results of the experiment determined that people were generally very helpful, although a little more reluctant to help a drunk. Do you think this study is ethically okay? Discuss.

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. (a) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. (b) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only avallable for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. (c) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

Charging for data? Data produced by the government are often available free or at low cost to private users. For example, satellite weather data produced by the U.S. National Weather Service are available free to TV stations for their weather reports and to anyone on the web. Opinion 1: Government data should be available to everyone at minimal cost. European governments, on the other hand, charge TV stations for weather data. Opinion 2: The satellites are. expensive, and the TV stations are making a profit from their weather services, so they should share the cost. Which opinion do you support, and why?

How many have HIV? Researchers from Yale, working with medical teams in Tanzania, wanted to know how common infection with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, is among pregnant women in that African country. To do this, they planned to test blood samples drawn from pregnant women. Yale's institutional review board insisted that the researchers get the informed consent of each woman and tell her the results of the test. This is the usual procedure in developed nations. The Tanzanian government did not want to tell the women why blood was drawn or tell them the test results. The government feared panic if many people turned out to have an incurable disease for which the country's medical system could not provide care. The study was canceled. Do you think that Yale was right to apply its usual standards for protecting subjects?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.