/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Undue Influence? Undue influence... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. (a) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. (b) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only avallable for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. (c) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Scenarios (b) and (c) represent undue influence; (a) does not.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Undue Influence

Undue influence occurs when an offer or reward is so tempting or overwhelming that it essentially pressures individuals into making a decision they might not otherwise make freely and informed.
02

Evaluate Scenario (a)

In scenario (a), students are given the option to earn extra credit through participation in a research study, but there is an alternative way available for those who do not wish to participate. This reduces the pressure to participate, suggesting that undue influence is minimized.
03

Evaluate Scenario (b)

In scenario (b), students receive extra credit simply for choosing to participate in the study, even if they drop out later. The absence of an alternative for obtaining extra credit and the ease of earning it may pressure students into participating, indicating potential undue influence.
04

Evaluate Scenario (c)

In scenario (c), students can only earn extra credit by completing the study. Without alternative options for obtaining extra credit, students may feel compelled to participate and remain committed, suggesting a situation of undue influence.
05

Comparative Analysis

Compare all scenarios. Scenario (a) offers an alternative and thus, minimizes undue influence. Both scenarios (b) and (c) potentially exhibit undue influence because they either have no alternatives or require students to stay committed under pressure for completion.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Undue Influence
Undue influence is a critical concept to understand when considering informed consent, especially in research settings. It occurs when an offer or incentive is so tempting that it overwhelms an individual's ability to make a free choice. This pressure can skew their decision-making process, leading them to accept participation in something they might otherwise decline.

Key elements of undue influence include:
  • Excessive Rewards: Offering prominent or irresistible rewards that could cloud judgment.
  • Lack of Alternatives: Not providing a reasonable alternative to obtain the same benefit.
  • Overwhelming Pressure: Creating a situation where individuals feel they have no choice but to agree out of compulsion.
Recognizing undue influence is vital to ensuring that participants' decisions are made voluntarily, without any coercion or manipulation.
Research Ethics
Research ethics are guidelines that help ensure the integrity and fairness of research practices. They are essential for protecting the rights and welfare of participants and maintaining public trust in scientific work.

These guidelines involve:
  • Informed Consent: Ensuring that participants are fully aware of what the research entails and their rights to withdraw at any time without penalty.
  • Respect for Persons: Treating individuals as autonomous agents and protecting those with diminished autonomy.
  • Beneficence: Minimizing any potential harms and maximizing benefits of research.
  • Justice: Ensuring fair distribution of the research's benefits and burdens.
By adhering to research ethics, we can uphold the dignity of our participants and ensure the credibility of our findings.
Extra Credit Policies
Extra credit policies in educational settings can serve as a motivation for students to enhance their grades through additional efforts. However, when integrated with research participation, these policies need careful consideration to prevent undue influence.

Important considerations include:
  • Voluntary Participation: Ensuring that students are free to choose whether or not to participate without any penalties.
  • Availability of Alternatives: Providing alternative means to earn extra credit for those who opt out of research participation.
  • Fairness and Equity: Ensuring that opportunities for extra credit are equitable to all students without bias or pressure.
Implementing thoughtful extra credit policies helps maintain a balance between incentivizing academic engagement and upholding ethical standards in research.
Student Participation in Research
Student participation in research offers valuable learning experiences but must be conducted ethically. Students may be invited to partake in studies that could benefit their understanding and knowledge.

To ethically involve students:
  • Clear Communication: Providing detailed information about the research purpose, methods, and potential impacts.
  • Voluntary Participation Assurance: Reinforcing that joining the study is optional and their academic standing will not be affected by their participation decisions.
  • Confidentiality: Protecting the privacy and data of student participants per ethical research standards.
Encouraging student participation under these ethical guidelines ensures that their involvement is beneficial and respectful, enhancing the educational value while protecting their rights.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

How many have HIV? Researchers from Yale, working with medical teams in Tanzania, wanted to know how common infection with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, is among pregnant women in that African country. To do this, they planned to test blood samples drawn from pregnant women. Yale's institutional review board insisted that the researchers get the informed consent of each woman and tell her the results of the test. This is the usual procedure in developed nations. The Tanzanian government did not want to tell the women why blood was drawn or tell them the test results. The government feared panic if many people turned out to have an incurable disease for which the country's medical system could not provide care. The study was canceled. Do you think that Yale was right to apply its usual standards for protecting subjects?

AIDS trials in Africa. The drug programs that treat AIDS in rich countries are very expensive, so some African nations cannot afford to give them to large numbers of people. Yet AIDS is more common in parts of Africa than anywhere else. "Short-course" drug programs that are much less expensive might help, for example, in preventing infected pregnant women from passing the infection to their unborn children. Is it ethical to compare a short-course program with a placebo in a clinical trial? Some say No: this is a double standard because, in rich countries, the full drug program would be the control treatment. Others say Yes: the intent is to find treatments that are practical in Africa, and the trial does not withhold any treatment that subjects would otherwise receive. What do you think?

y Who reviews? Government regulations requre that institutional review boards consist of at least five people, including at least one scientist, one nonscientist, and one person from outside the institution. Most boards are larger, but many contain just one outsider. (a) Why should review boards contain people who are not scientists? (b) Do you think that one outside member is enough? How would you choose that member? (For example, would you prefer a medical doctor? A member of the clergy? An activist for patients' rights?)

Sunshine Laws. All states in the United States have open records laws, sometimes known as " Sunshine Laws," that give citizens access to government meetings and records." This includes, for example, reports of crimes and recordings of 911 calls. A crime report will include the name of anyone accused of the crime. Suppose a 10-year-old juvenile is accused of committing a crime. A reporter from the local newspaper asks for a copy of the crime report. The sheriff refuses to provide the report because the accused is a juvenile and he believes the name of the accused should be confidential. Is this an issue of confidentiality? Discuss.

Undue influence? An investigator wants to conduct a funded study of the safety of a vaccine to prevent hepatitis \(\mathrm{C}\) involving prisoners as subjects. Prisoners will receive either vaccine or placebo and then be asked to complete surveys and undergo physical exams to assess for adverse effects. In order to ensure that subjects will report side effects and cooperate with exams, prisoners who are judged by the guards to be most compliant and well- behaved are nonrandomly assigned to the experimental arm; others are assigned to the control (placebo) arm. To encourage participation, prisoners are offered better meals and the opportunity for better-paying jobs in the prison. Are there any aspects of this study that you object to? Why?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.