/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 11 Is consent needed? In which of t... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Is consent needed? In which of the following circumstances would you allow collecting personal information without the subjects' consent? (a) A govemment agency takes a random sample of income tax retums to obtain information on the marital status and average income of people who identify themselves as belonging to an ultraconservative political group. Only the marital status and income are recorded from the retums, not the names. (b) A social psychologist attends public meetings of an ultraconservative political group to study the behavior pattems of members. (c) A social psychologist pretends to be converted to membership of an ultraconservative political group and attends private meetings to study the behavior patterns of members.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Consent is not needed for (b), but is required for (a) and (c).

Step by step solution

01

Analyze Situation (a)

In situation (a), the government agency is examining income tax returns to collect data on marital status and average income, without collecting names. Although the identifiers are removed, tax returns are typically protected under privacy laws, and consent is generally required to collect or use personal information from tax records for research purposes, even if the information seems anonymized. Considerations about legal limitations and ethical implications are crucial here. In most cases, consent would still be needed.
02

Analyze Situation (b)

In situation (b), the social psychologist attends public meetings to observe behavior patterns. Public meetings are open to everyone, and individuals generally have no expectation of privacy in these settings. Since no personal data is collected and the behavior is observed in a public domain, consent is typically not needed for observational studies in public settings. However, the researcher should still follow ethical guidelines specific to the context of the study.
03

Analyze Situation (c)

In situation (c), the social psychologist infiltrates a private setting by pretending to be a member. This involves deception and entry into a space where members could reasonably expect privacy. Collecting data in such settings without consent is unethical and breaches privacy, as the participants are unaware of being studied and have not given permission for their private interactions to be observed. Consent would be necessary in this scenario.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Informed Consent
Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical research. It involves obtaining voluntary agreement from individuals before they participate in a study. This means participants must be fully aware of the nature of the research, its purpose, potential risks, benefits, and their right to withdraw at any time without penalty.
It's crucial to ensure participants understand exactly what the study involves. When informed consent is neglected, it can lead to ethical breaches, such as in the scenario where a researcher joins a private group pretending to be a member, deceiving the participants.
Researchers must clearly communicate in simple terms, allowing participants to ask questions. Ideally, this process is documented to safeguard both the participants' rights and the researcher's integrity.
Privacy in Research
Privacy in research refers to the protection of participants' personal information. It ensures that any data collected is kept confidential and is not shared without their explicit consent. In some cases, like observational studies in public settings, the expectations of privacy might be different since public behavior is considered less private.
However, when dealing with private settings, like tax returns or private meetings, privacy laws are stricter. In these scenarios, such as when a government agency reviews tax returns, consent is generally needed. Protecting privacy in research not only follows legal requirements but it also helps maintain public trust in scientific inquiry.
Observational Studies
Observational studies involve watching subjects in their natural environment without interference. These studies are typically conducted in public settings, like attending a public meeting of a group, where people aren't legally expected to have their privacy protected.
While conducting observational studies, researchers must ensure that their presence doesn't alter the behavior of those being observed. Ethically, it's vital to respect the subjects, even in public spaces. However, when deception is involved to gain access, like pretending to belong to a group, such practices are not only unethical but could also invalidate the study's findings due to the lack of informed consent.
Anonymized Data
Anonymized data refers to information from which personal identifiers have been removed, so individuals cannot easily be recognized. In research, particularly with sensitive data like tax returns, anonymization is used to protect individuals' privacy.
Nevertheless, the ethical considerations remain complex since even data considered anonymized can sometimes be traced back to individuals through indirect identifiers. Therefore, it's crucial to not only anonymize data but also to ensure additional safeguards, like obtaining consent where necessary and limiting data access to authorized personnel only.
Researchers should always take extra steps to verify that their anonymization processes are robust enough to prevent any potential breaches of privacy.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Undue influence? An investigator wants to conduct a funded study of the safety of a vaccine to prevent hepatitis \(\mathrm{C}\) involving prisoners as subjects. Prisoners will receive either vaccine or placebo and then be asked to complete surveys and undergo physical exams to assess for adverse effects. In order to ensure that subjects will report side effects and cooperate with exams, prisoners who are judged by the guards to be most compliant and well- behaved are nonrandomly assigned to the experimental arm; others are assigned to the control (placebo) arm. To encourage participation, prisoners are offered better meals and the opportunity for better-paying jobs in the prison. Are there any aspects of this study that you object to? Why?

Asking teens about sex. A survey of teenagers asked the subjects if they had ever been physically forced to have sexual intercourse when they did not want to. In a follow-up question, subjects were asked how many times this had happened. Should consent of parents be required to ask minors about sex, drugs, and other such issues, or is consent of the minors themselves enough? Give reasons for your opinion.

AIDS trials in Africa. The drug programs that treat AIDS in rich countries are very expensive, so some African nations cannot afford to give them to large numbers of people. Yet AIDS is more common in parts of Africa than anywhere else. "Short-course" drug programs that are much less expensive might help, for example, in preventing infected pregnant women from passing the infection to their unborn children. Is it ethical to compare a short-course program with a placebo in a clinical trial? Some say No: this is a double standard because, in rich countries, the full drug program would be the control treatment. Others say Yes: the intent is to find treatments that are practical in Africa, and the trial does not withhold any treatment that subjects would otherwise receive. What do you think?

Coercion? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations \({ }^{7}\) for informed consent state that, "An investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence." Coercion occurs when an overt or implicit threat of harm is intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes coercion? Discuss. (a) A researcher has developed a vaccine against a new virus. The researcher is recruiting healthy adult volunteers from an inner city to determine if the vaccine is safe in humans. Volunteers will be paid for their participation. One participant tells one of the research nurses that he would not have enrolled in the study, but he recently lost his job and needs the money. He claims that he feels as though he has no alternative but to participate. (b) A research nurse is asked to consent and provide samples for three minimal risk studies during her first week on the job. She is told "everyone working here is enrolled in these studies."

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. (a) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. (b) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only avallable for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. (c) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.