/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Unequal benefits. Researchers on... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Unequal benefits. Researchers on depression proposed to investigate the effect of supplemental therapy and counseling on the quality of life of adults with depression. Eligible patients on the rolls of a large medical clinic were to be randomly assigned to treatment and control groups. The treatment group would be offered dental care, vision testing, transportation, and other services not available without charge to the control group. The review board felt that providing these services to some but not other persons in the same institution raised ethical questions. Do you agree? Explain your answer.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Yes, providing unequal benefits raises ethical issues of fairness and participant well-being.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Research Context

The exercise presents a research study on the effects of supplemental therapy and counseling on adults with depression. The study involves dividing patients into two groups: treatment and control. The treatment group will receive additional services free of charge.
02

Assess the Ethical Considerations

The treatment group has access to extra services, such as dental care and vision testing, which are not provided to the control group. This situation is controversial because both groups are part of the same institution.
03

Evaluate the Fairness and Justice Principle

In research, the fairness and justice principle emphasizes that all participants should have equal opportunities or compensations unless justified differently by the study. The unequal distribution of resources may result in an unfair advantage for the treatment group.
04

Consider the Impact on Participant Well-being

The review board is concerned about the ethical implications because offering additional services to only one group might negatively affect the well-being of the control group, who may feel neglected or unfairly treated.
05

Draw a Conclusion

Based on the ethical principles of fairness, justice, and participant well-being, it's reasonable to agree with the review board's concern that the study design raises ethical questions that need addressing.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Fairness in Research
Fairness in research means treating all participants equally and ensuring that no group receives unfair advantages over the others. In the context of our exercise, the treatment group was provided with extra services such as dental care and vision testing, while the control group did not receive these benefits.
This difference raises concerns about fairness because both groups are from the same institution and should ideally have equal access to such services. Research fairness ensures that the study results are reliable and applicable to the larger population without favoritism or bias.
When unfairness exists, it could lead to skewed data, damaging the validity of the research findings. Researchers must design studies that avoid giving undue advantages to any participant group unless they are justifiably necessary for the research objectives.
Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations are crucial in planning and conducting research. They involve the moral obligations researchers have toward their participants, ensuring their rights and dignity are respected. In our study, ethical issues emerge from providing extra services to the treatment group that the control group does not receive.
These issues are significant because they present a moral dilemma of whether it's right to give certain benefits to some participants and not others, potentially impacting the perceived honesty and integrity of the research. As part of ethical conduct, researchers need protocols that address potential biases and ensure that all aspects of the study are fair and transparent.
  • Confidentiality: Ensuring participant data is protected.
  • Informed Consent: Participants must fully understand the study's nature and any risks involved.
  • Respect: Treating all participants with dignity and without discrimination.
Being attentive to these considerations not only protects participants but also enhances the credibility of the research itself.
Participant Well-being
Participant well-being must be a priority in research, entailing the physical and psychological safety of those involved in the study. In the exercise, participants in the control group might feel overlooked because they do not receive the additional care given to the treatment group.
This lack of equal care could adversely affect their morale, potentially worsening their condition or causing distress. Researchers have the duty to minimize any harm and enhance the well-being of all participants, ensuring they feel valued and respected throughout the research process.
It is crucial to understand that the research's ethical framework should safeguard the participant's mental and emotional health by proactively identifying and addressing any potential distress points. This approach not only helps in achieving accurate results but also upholds the dignity of all participants involved.
Justice Principle
The Justice Principle in research stipulates that benefits and burdens should be distributed fairly among all participants. In the study scenario, unequal distribution of additional services like dental care and vision testing challenges this principle.
Justice ensures that research does not exploit or unfairly disadvantage a group, thereby enabling all participants to have an equal stake in the potential benefits of the research. This helps to maintain trust between researchers and participants, as well as in the scientific community at large.
By adhering to this principle, researchers ensure that the study's findings are not just valid but equitably applicable across different population segments. This ethical foundation provides a platform for research that is fair, balanced, and respectful of every participant's right to share in the benefits or receive adequate compensation if disparities cannot be reasonably justified.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Undue Influence? Undue influence in obtaining informed consent often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes undue influence? Discuss. (a) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. An alternative means of obtaining extra credit is available for students not wishing to participate. (b) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. Extra credit is only avallable for students who choose to participate but will be awarded even if a student drops out of the study before it is completed. (c) The students in a professor's class are told they will be given extra credit if they participate in a research study she is conducting. The extra credit will only be awarded to those students who continue in the study until it is finished.

y Who reviews? Government regulations requre that institutional review boards consist of at least five people, including at least one scientist, one nonscientist, and one person from outside the institution. Most boards are larger, but many contain just one outsider. (a) Why should review boards contain people who are not scientists? (b) Do you think that one outside member is enough? How would you choose that member? (For example, would you prefer a medical doctor? A member of the clergy? An activist for patients' rights?)

Is consent needed? In which of the following circumstances would you allow collecting personal information without the subjects' consent? (a) A govemment agency takes a random sample of income tax retums to obtain information on the marital status and average income of people who identify themselves as belonging to an ultraconservative political group. Only the marital status and income are recorded from the retums, not the names. (b) A social psychologist attends public meetings of an ultraconservative political group to study the behavior pattems of members. (c) A social psychologist pretends to be converted to membership of an ultraconservative political group and attends private meetings to study the behavior patterns of members.

Coercion? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services regulations \({ }^{7}\) for informed consent state that, "An investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence." Coercion occurs when an overt or implicit threat of harm is intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance. Which of the following circumstances do you believe constitutes coercion? Discuss. (a) A researcher has developed a vaccine against a new virus. The researcher is recruiting healthy adult volunteers from an inner city to determine if the vaccine is safe in humans. Volunteers will be paid for their participation. One participant tells one of the research nurses that he would not have enrolled in the study, but he recently lost his job and needs the money. He claims that he feels as though he has no alternative but to participate. (b) A research nurse is asked to consent and provide samples for three minimal risk studies during her first week on the job. She is told "everyone working here is enrolled in these studies."

Deceiving Subjects. Researchers are interested in assessing the \({ }^{\alpha}\) Good Samaritan" behavior of unsuspecting travelers in a subway train. A model, either apparently drunk or carrying a cane, would collapse, and the amount of helpful interventions by travelers would be determined. The results of the experiment determined that people were generally very helpful, although a little more reluctant to help a drunk. Do you think this study is ethically okay? Discuss.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.