/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Which of the following are true?... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a. A very low P-value provides evidence against the null hypothesis. b. A high P-value is strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. c. AP-value above 0.10 shows that the null hypothesis is true. d. If the null hypothesis is true, you can't get a P-value below 0.01

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. True, b. False (A high P-value means that the data does not provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis, it doesn't provide strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis.), c. False (A P-value above 0.10 means the data does not provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis, but it doesn't confirm the null hypothesis is true), d. False (Even if the null hypothesis is true, it's possible to get a p-value below 0.01 due to random variations in the sample.)

Step by step solution

01

Understanding P-value

P-value is a statistical measurement indicating the probability that the collected data would be the same if the null hypothesis were true. Therefore, a smaller p-value shows that the evidence against the null hypothesis is stronger.
02

Comment statement A

Statement (a) says 'A very low p-value provides evidence against the null hypothesis.' This is true because a lower p-value signifies that it is less likely that the observed data occurred by chance, thus providing stronger evidence against the null hypothesis if it is true.
03

Comment statement B

Statement (b) - 'A high P-value is strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis.' - is false. A high p-value shows that the observational data very likely could have occurred by chance if the null hypothesis is true. However, it does not provide strong evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. Instead, it fails to provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
04

Comment statement C

Statement (c) - 'A P-value above 0.10 shows that the null hypothesis is true.' - is false. A p-value above 0.10 shows that the data does not provide strong evidence against the null hypothesis if it is true. However, it does not confirm that the null hypothesis is indeed true.
05

Comment statement D

Statement (d) - 'If the null hypothesis is true, you can't get a p-value below 0.01.' - is false. Even if the null hypothesis is true, if we collect enough observational data, it's possible to get a p-value below 0.01 due to random variations in the sample.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a statement used in statistics that proposes there is no difference or effect between certain characteristics or variables. It serves as a starting point for statistical testing and is the assumption that any observed effect is due to chance rather than a systematic cause.

For instance, if we are testing the effectiveness of a new drug, the null hypothesis would state that the drug has no effect on patients compared to a placebo. In the context of the exercise, a low p-value would challenge the null hypothesis, implying that the observed data might not be a result of random chance, suggesting that the drug could have an effect.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a determination that an observed effect in the data is unlikely to have occurred due to random chance at a certain probability threshold. This concept is central to hypothesis testing, where researchers decide on a significance level, commonly set at 0.05 or 5%, before conducting the test.

A p-value that is less than the chosen significance level indicates that the results are statistically significant, meaning that the null hypothesis is less likely to be true. However, it's critical to note that 'statistical significance' does not necessarily imply practical or clinical significance and must be interpreted in the context of the study.
Probability and Chance
Probability and chance are measures of the likelihood that a specific event will occur. In the realm of statistics, they play a pivotal role in interpreting the results of experiments and studies. Probability is quantified on a scale from 0 to 1, with 0 signifying impossibility and 1 indicating certainty.

The concept is crucial in understanding p-values. A high p-value suggests that there is a higher probability that the observed data could occur under the null hypothesis due to random chance alone, while a low p-value suggests a lower probability, thereby casting doubt on the null hypothesis. It's important to remember that probability does not confirm certainty; rather, it expresses the degree of likelihood based on the given evidence.
Interpreting P-values
Interpreting p-values is fundamental to making conclusions in hypothesis testing. A p-value is the probability of observing the given sample data, or something more extreme, assuming the null hypothesis is true. When the p-value is low, it suggests that such an extreme result is unlikely to have occurred by chance, questioning the validity of the null hypothesis.

A common misconception, as highlighted in the exercise, is that a high p-value confirms the null hypothesis. However, it merely indicates the lack of evidence to reject it. Conversely, a p-value below a set threshold does not prove an alternative hypothesis; it solely points to the possibility that the null hypothesis may not explain the data well. Therefore, while a p-value informs us about the likelihood of the data given the null hypothesis, it should be carefully weighed with other scientific and experimental considerations to draw meaningful conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In a drawer are two coins. They look the same, but one coin produces heads \(90 \%\) of the time when spun while the other one produces heads only \(30 \%\) of the time. You select one of the coins. You are allowed to spin it once and then must decide whether the coin is the \(90 \%\) - or the \(30 \%\) -head coin. Your null hypothesis is that your coin produces \(90 \%\) heads. a. What is the alternative hypothesis? b. Given that the outcome of your spin is tails, what would you decide? What if it were heads? c. How large is \(\alpha\) in this case? d. How large is the power of this test? (Hint: How many possibilities are in the alternative hypothesis?) e. How could you lower the probability of a Type I error and increase the power of the test at the same time?

Have harsher penalties and ad campaigns increased seat-belt use among drivers and passengers? Observations of commuter traffic failed to find evidence of a significant change compared with three years ago. Explain what the study's P-value of 0.17 means in this context.

For each of the following situations, state whether a Type I, a Type II, or neither error has been made. a. A test of \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: \mu=25\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: \mu>25\) rejects the null hypothesis. Later it is discovered that \(\mu=24.9\). b. A test of \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.8\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p<0.8\) fails to reject the null hypothesis. Later it is discovered that \(p=0.9\). c. A test of \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.5\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p \neq 0.5\) rejects the null hypothesis. Later it is discovered that \(p=0.65\). d. A test of \(\mathrm{H}_{0}: p=0.7\) vs. \(\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{A}}: p<0.7\) fails to reject the null hypothesis. Later it is discovered that \(p=0.6\).

A clean air standard requires that vehicle exhaust emissions not exceed specified limits for various pollutants. Many states require that cars be tested annually to be sure they meet these standards. Suppose state regulators double-check a random sample of cars that a suspect repair shop has certified as okay. They will revoke the shop's license if they find significant evidence that the shop is certifying vehicles that do not meet standards. a. In this context, what is a Type I error? b. In this context, what is a Type II error? c. Which type of error would the shop's owner consider more serious? d. Which type of error might environmentalists consider more serious?

Environmentalists concerned about the impact of high-frequency radio transmissions on birds found that there was no evidence of a higher mortality rate among hatchlings in nests near cell towers. They based this conclusion on a test using \(\alpha=0.05\). Would they have made the same decision at \(\alpha=0.10 ?\) How about \(\alpha=0.01 ?\) Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.