/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 2 Which of the following are true?... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a. If the null hypothesis is true, you'll get a high P-value. b. If the null hypothesis is true, a P-value of 0.01 will occur about \(1 \%\) of the time. c. A P-value of 0.90 means that the null hypothesis has a good chance of being true. d. AP-value of 0.90 is strong evidence that the null hypothesis is true.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Statement a is true while the statements b, c, and d are false. A high P-value indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so it would not be rejected, not that it has a good chance of being true. The P-value is the probability of the observed data (or something more extreme), given that the null hypothesis is true and not the other way around. Furthermore, a P-value of 0.01 does not indicate it would occur 1% of the time.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding statement a

Statement a says 'If the null hypothesis is true, you'll get a high P-value.' This statement is generally true. If our null hypothesis is correct, then we would expect our test statistic to give us a P-value which is high (typically > 0.05) indicating a large likelihood of observing the data we have actually observed, within the frame of our null hypothesis.
02

Understanding statement b

Statement b says 'If the null hypothesis is true, a P-value of 0.01 will occur about 1% of the time.' This statement is false. The P-value is not a fixed percentage occurrence but is the exact probability of the test statistic being at least as extreme as what is observed assuming the null hypothesis is true. Hence a P-value of 0.01 does not mean it will occur 1% of the time.
03

Understanding statement c

Statement c states 'A P-value of 0.90 means that the null hypothesis has a good chance of being true.' This statement is false. A larger P-value indicates weak evidence against the null hypothesis, so we fail to reject it, but that doesn't mean null hypothesis is true. Therefore the P-value itself is not a direct measure of the probability of the null hypothesis being true.
04

Understanding statement d

Statement d says 'A P-value of 0.90 is strong evidence that the null hypothesis is true.' Similar to statement c, this is also false. A high P-value, i.e., 0.90, means that there is not much evidence against the null hypothesis, hence we fail to reject it. But it does not confidently confirm that the null hypothesis is true.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis is a foundational aspect of statistical hypothesis testing. It is a default statement that there is no effect or no difference. In simpler terms, it proposes that any changes we observe in our experiment are by chance or random variation.
- For example, when testing a new drug, the null hypothesis might be that the drug has no effect on patients compared to a placebo. - It is not a statement about the likelihood of truth, but a stance taken to test against possible alternative outcomes.
In hypothesis testing, we either reject the null hypothesis or fail to reject it. Not rejecting the null does not prove it's true but suggests there's insufficient evidence to say otherwise.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a concept used to determine if the results from the data analysis are meaningful. It helps ascertain if the observed patterns or differences in data are likely due to actual factors rather than random chance.
- The threshold for statistical significance is often set at a 0.05 level. This means that there is only a 5% chance that the results are due to random chance, and not actual effects. - Statistical significance does not measure the size of an effect or its importance—only the likelihood that an observation is due to chance.
This measure is crucial in making decisions in hypothesis testing. If results are statistically significant, it leads us to reject the null hypothesis.
Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a procedure in statistics that allows us to test an assumption about a population parameter. It involves setting up two hypotheses: the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.
- The null hypothesis states that there is no effect or no difference. - The alternative hypothesis suggests there is indeed an effect or difference.
The steps in hypothesis testing involve:
  • Setting up the hypotheses
  • Selecting a significance level (alpha)
  • Calculating the appropriate test statistic and P-value from the data
  • Making a decision to reject or not reject the null hypothesis based on the P-value and chosen significance level
Successful hypothesis testing enables researchers to make informed conclusions about their data.
P-Value Probability
The P-value is a key component in hypothesis testing, providing insight into the evidence against the null hypothesis. It is the probability of observing data as extreme as what was observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
- A small P-value (typically ≤ 0.05) suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis, leading us to reject it. - A large P-value indicates weaker evidence against the null hypothesis, where we fail to reject it. - The P-value itself is not the probability that either the null or alternative hypothesis is true.
Understanding P-values is essential in interpreting statistical outcomes, and they help guide decisions in research. It is important to note that a non-significant P-value is not proof of the null hypothesis being true; instead, it only implies insufficient evidence to reject it.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Which of the following are true? If false, explain briefly. a. A very high P-value is strong evidence that the null hypothesis is false. b. A very low P-value proves that the null hypothesis is false. c. A high P-value shows that the null hypothesis is true. d. A P-value below 0.05 is always considered sufficient evidence to reject a null hypothesis.

In 2015 , the U.S. Census Bureau reported that \(62.2 \%\) of American families owned their homes the lowest rate in 20 years. Census data reveal that the ownership rate in one small city is much lower. The city council is debating a plan to offer tax breaks to first-time home buyers to encourage people to become homeowners. They decide to adopt the plan on a 2 -year trial basis and use the data they collect to make a decision about continuing the tax breaks. Since this plan costs the city tax revenues, they will continue to use it only if there is strong evidence that the rate of home ownership is increasing. a. In words, what will their hypotheses be? b. What would a Type I error be? c. What would a Type II error be? d. For each type of error, tell who would be harmed. e. What would the power of the test represent in this context?

Which of the following statements are true? If false, explain briefly. a. Using an alpha level of \(0.05,\) a P-value of 0.04 results in rejecting the null hypothesis. b. The alpha level depends on the sample size. C. With an alpha level of \(0.01,\) a \(P\) -value of 0.10 results in rejecting the null hypothesis. d. Using an alpha level of \(0.05,\) a P-value of 0.06 means the null hypothesis is true.

Spam filters try to sort your e-mails, deciding which are real messages and which are unwanted. One method used is a point system. The filter reads each incoming e-mail and assigns points to the sender, the subject, key words in the message, and so on. The higher the point total, the more likely it is that the message is unwanted. The filter has a cutoff value for the point total; any message rated lower than that cutoff passes through to your inbox, and the rest, suspected to be spam, are diverted to the junk mailbox. We can think of the filter's decision as a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis is that the e-mail is a real message and should go to your inbox. A higher point total provides evidence that the message may be spam; when there's sufficient evidence, the filter rejects the null, classifying the message as junk. This usually works pretty well, but, of course, sometimes the filter makes a mistake. a. When the filter allows spam to slip through into your inbox, which kind of error is that? b. Which kind of error is it when a real message gets classified as junk? c. Some filters allow the user (that's you) to adjust the cutoff. Suppose your filter has a default cutoff of 50 points, but you reset it to 60 . Is that analogous to choosing a higher or lower value of \(\alpha\) for a hypothesis test? Explain. d. What impact does this change in the cutoff value have on the chance of each type of error?

A new reading program may reduce the number of elementary school students who read below grade level. The company that developed this program supplied materials and teacher training for a large-scale test involving nearly 8500 children in several different school districts. Statistical analysis of the results showed that the percentage of students who did not meet the grade- level goal was reduced from \(15.9 \%\) to \(15.1 \%\). The hypothesis that the new reading program produced no improvement was rejected with a P-value of 0.023 . a. Explain what the P-value means in this context. b. Even though this reading method has been shown to be significantly better, why might you not recommend that your local school adopt it?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.