/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 127 6.127 Team Batting Average in Ba... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

6.127 Team Batting Average in Baseball The dataset BaseballHits gives 2014 season statistics for all Major League Baseball teams. We treat this as a sample of all MLB teams in all years. Computer output of descriptive statistics for the variable giving the batting average is shown: Descriptive Statistics: BattingAvg \(\begin{array}{rrrr}\mathrm{N} & \text { Mean } & \text { SE Mean } & \text { StDev } \\ 30 & 0.25110 & 0.00200 & 0.01096\end{array}\) Variable BattingAvg \(\begin{array}{rrrrr}\text { Minimum } & \text { Q1 } & \text { Median } & \text { Q3 } & \text { Maximum } \\ 0.22600 & 0.24350 & 0.25300 & 0.25675 & 0.27700\end{array}\) (a) How many teams are included in the dataset? What is the mean batting average? What is the standard deviation? (b) Use the descriptive statistics above to conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is evidence that average team batting average is different from 0.260 . Show all details of the test. (c) Compare the test statistic and p-value you found in part (b) to the computer output below for the same data: One-Sample T: BattingAvg Test of \(m u=0.26\) vs not \(=0.26\) \(\begin{array}{lrrr}\text { Variable } & \text { N } & \text { Mean } & \text { StDev } \\ \text { BattingAvg } & 30 & 0.25110 & 0.01096 \\ \text { SE Mean } & 95 \% \text { Cl } & \text { T } & \text { P } \\ 0.00200 & \\{0.24701,0.25519) & -4.45 & 0.000\end{array}\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The dataset includes statistics from 30 teams. The mean batting average is \(0.25110\) while the standard deviation is \(0.01096\). By conducting a hypothesis test, it was found that the mean batting average was significantly different from \(0.260\) with a t-value of \(-4.475372208025383\) and a p-value lower than \(0.05\), as seen from both manually conducted analysis and the computer output presented.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret Descriptive Statistics

The descriptive statistics table provides us with various pieces of information, including number of teams (\(N=30\)), mean batting average (\(0.25110\)), standard deviation (\(0.01096\)), minimum batting average (\(0.22600\)), first quartile (\(0.24350\)), median (\(0.25300\)), third quartile (\(0.25675\)), and maximum batting average (\(0.27700\)).
02

Conduct Hypothesis Test

We conduct a hypothesis test to determine whether there is evidence that average team batting average differs from \(0.260\). The null hypothesis is that the mean team batting average is equal to \(0.260\) (\(H0: \mu = 0.260\)), and the alternative hypothesis is that it differs (\(H1: \mu ≠ 0.260\)). The test statistic is calculated using the formula \(t = \frac{ (\bar{x}- \mu) }{ \frac{s}{\sqrt{n}} }\), where \(\bar{x}\) = sample mean, \(\mu\) = population mean, \(s\) = standard deviation, and \(n\) = number of observations. Inserting the values, the test statistic \(t = \frac{(0.25110 - 0.260)}{0.01096/\sqrt{30}} = -4.475372208025383\). The exact p-value cannot be calculated without additional statistical tables or software, but we know it will be very small since the magnitude of the t-score is quite large.
03

Compare to Computer Output

Comparing our calculated t-value with the computer output, we can see that our manually calculated t-value matches the one calculated by the computer (\(-4.475372208025383\) approx to \(-4.45\)). The p-value reported in the computer output is \(0.000\), providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis. This indicates that the mean batting average is significantly different from \(0.260\) with a confidence level of \(95\%.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental part of statistics used to make inferences or draw conclusions about a population based on a sample. It helps in deciding whether the observed data is significantly different from what was expected. In simple terms, it tests if the difference between a sample statistic and a population parameter is significant.

Here's a brief step-by-step guide:
  • **Formulate Hypotheses**: Start by stating the null hypothesis (\(H_0\)) and the alternative hypothesis (\(H_1\)). For the baseball dataset, \(H_0\) is that the mean batting average is \(0.260\) and \(H_1\) is that it is not 0.260.
  • **Choose a Significance Level**: Commonly, the significance level is set at \(0.05\) or \(5\%\), meaning there's a 5% risk of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true.
  • **Calculate the Test Statistic**: This helps measure how far your sample statistic is from the null hypothesis. In the exercise, a t-test was used, where the test statistic was calculated as:\[t = \frac{(\bar{x} - \mu)}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}\]where \(\bar{x}\) is the sample mean, \(\mu\) is the population mean, \(s\) is the standard deviation, and \(n\) is the sample size.
  • **Determine the p-value**: This indicates the probability of observing the test results under the null hypothesis. Here, a p-value = \(0.000\) suggests strong evidence against \(H_0\).
  • **Draw a Conclusion**: If the p-value is less than the significance level, reject \(H_0\). In our example, it implies that the batting average is significantly different from \(0.260\).
Batting Average
A batting average, a crucial statistic in baseball, represents a player's ability to hit the ball effectively. It's calculated by dividing the number of hits by the number of at-bats, providing an indication of a player's hitting success.

For example:
  • If a player has 50 hits out of 200 at-bats, the batting average is calculated as \ \(\frac{50}{200} = 0.250\)
  • A higher batting average suggests better performance at hitting. For instance, a batting average above \(0.300\) is typically considered excellent in the Major Leagues.
  • The average for an entire team or league can give insights into overall hitting trends in a season, just like the exercise focused on team batting averages across the MLB 2014 season.
In the context of Major League Baseball (MLB), team batting averages can play a vital role in assessing team performance and player evaluation. It’s an integral part of strategy planning for games and long-term player development.
Major League Baseball Statistics
Major League Baseball (MLB) statistics encompass a wide range of data points that help evaluate team and player performance throughout the season. These statistics are crucial for managers, scouts, and analysts looking to make informed decisions.

Key statistics in MLB include:
  • **Batting Average (BA)**: Reflects how often team members hit successfully. As calculated in the exercise, the mean \(0.25110\) indicates overall performance tendencies in 2014.
  • **Home Runs (HRs)**: The number of unchallenged bases reached. It’s often used as a measure of a player’s power and ability to hit long.
  • **Runs Batted In (RBIs)**: How many runners a hitter has driven home, measures productivity.
  • **Earned Run Average (ERA)**: Shows a pitcher’s average number of earned runs given up, indicating pitching effectiveness.
  • **Wins Above Replacement (WAR)**: A comprehensive stat designed to gauge a player's overall contributions beyond just batting or pitching skills.
These statistics help in determining a player's value and team strategy, both on a game-by-game basis and when devising long-term team strategies. Understanding these metrics allows for a richer comprehension of the game and helps enthusiasts and professionals alike appreciate performance levels.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

We examine the effect of different inputs on determining the sample size needed to obtain a specific margin of error when finding a confidence interval for a proportion. Find the sample size needed to give a margin of error to estimate a proportion within \(\pm 3 \%\) with \(99 \%\) confidence. With \(95 \%\) confidence. With \(90 \%\) confidence. (Assume no prior knowledge about the population proportion \(p\).) Comment on the relationship between the sample size and the confidence level desired.

Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion two ways: using StatKey or other technology and percentiles from a bootstrap distribution, and using the normal distribution and the formula for standard error. Compare the results. Proportion of Reese's Pieces that are orange, using \(\hat{p}=0.48\) with \(n=150\)

Metal Tags on Penguins and Survival Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying metal tags is detrimental to penguins. One variable examined is the survival rate 10 years after tagging. The scientists observed that 10 of the 50 metal tagged penguins survived, compared to 18 of the 50 electronic tagged penguins. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion surviving between the metal and electronic tagged penguins \(\left(p_{M}-p_{E}\right)\). Interpret the result.

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. To study the effect of women's tears on men, levels of testosterone are measured in 50 men after they sniff women's tears and after they sniff a salt solution. The order of the two treatments was randomized and the study was double-blind.

Physician's Health Study In the Physician's Health Study, introduced in Data 1.6 on page 37 , 22,071 male physicians participated in a study to determine whether taking a daily low-dose aspirin reduced the risk of heart attacks. The men were randomly assigned to two groups and the study was double-blind. After five years, 104 of the 11,037 men taking a daily low-dose aspirin had had a heart attack while 189 of the 11,034 men taking a placebo had had a heart attack. \({ }^{39}\) Does taking a daily lowdose aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Conduct the test, and, in addition, explain why we can infer a causal relationship from the results.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.