/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 Find a \(95 \%\) confidence inte... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Find a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion two ways: using StatKey or other technology and percentiles from a bootstrap distribution, and using the normal distribution and the formula for standard error. Compare the results. Proportion of Reese's Pieces that are orange, using \(\hat{p}=0.48\) with \(n=150\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
Both methods should yield a reasonably close estimate for the 95% confidence interval of the proportion. The slight differences between the two intervals can be explained by the resampling process in the bootstrap method and the approximation of the sampling distribution in the normal distribution method.

Step by step solution

01

Bootstrap Method

Using Bootstrap method, generate a bootstrap distribution of sample proportions. Use the original sample proportion (\( \hat{p} = 0.48 \)) as the center of the distribution and generate random samples with replacement from the dataset, calculate the sample proportions and plot their frequencies. Find the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of this distribution, which correspond to the lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval respectively.
02

Normal Distribution Method

Using the normal distribution method, first calculate the standard error (SE) with the formula: SE = \( \sqrt{ \hat{p}(1 - \hat{p}) / n} \) where \( \hat{p} =0.48 \) is the sample proportion and n = 150 is the sample size. Once the standard error is calculated, find the z-score corresponding to the 2.5th percentile (z = -1.96 for a 95% confidence interval) and the 97.5th percentile (z = 1.96 for a 95% confidence interval) from the Z-table. This z-score gives us the number of standard errors away from the mean our confidence interval bounds are. Then the confidence interval is calculated using the formula: [ \( \hat{p} \) + (z * SE), \( \hat{p} \) - (z * SE)]
03

Comparison of Results

Finally, compare the results of the two methods. They should be fairly close, as they both estimate the same confidence interval. However, minor differences may be due to the resampling process in the bootstrap method and the approximation of the sampling distribution to normal in the normal distribution method.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Bootstrap Method
The Bootstrap Method is a powerful statistical technique used to estimate the distribution of a sample statistic by resampling with replacement from the original dataset. It is especially useful when the theoretical distribution is unknown or complex.

How does it work? Simply put, you take your original data and create many "bootstrap samples" by sampling with replacement. This means some data points can appear more than once in a bootstrap sample, while others may not appear at all. For each bootstrap sample, you calculate the statistic of interest; in this case, the sample proportion of orange Reese's Pieces.

This process is repeated many times (often thousands), resulting in a bootstrap distribution of sample proportions. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of this distribution provide the lower and upper bounds for a 95% confidence interval, hence capturing the range where the true proportion is expected to lie.
  • This method is non-parametric, meaning it doesn't rely on underlying statistical distributions.
  • It allows for easy visualization of the variability and uncertainty of your estimate.
  • It is computationally intensive but offers flexibility and robust estimates.
Normal Distribution
The Normal Distribution, also known as the Gaussian distribution, is a bell-shaped curve that is pivotal in statistics. It is symmetric, with its peak at the mean and tails fading symmetrically on both sides.

Why is it important in constructing confidence intervals? Because many statistical methods assume data is normally distributed or can be approximated to a normal distribution. For a large sample size, the Central Limit Theorem states that the distribution of the sample mean will approximate a normal distribution, *even if the underlying distribution is not normal.*

When constructing a confidence interval for a proportion using normal approximation:
  • We use z-scores to represent the number of standard deviations an element is from the mean.
  • For a 95% confidence interval, this corresponds to z-scores of -1.96 and 1.96, which capture the middle 95% of the bell curve.
  • This method is efficient and straightforward when dealing with large samples.
Standard Error
The Standard Error (SE) is a measure of the variability or "spread" of a sampling distribution. It tells us how much our sample statistic (like a proportion or mean) might vary from the true population value.

To calculate the SE for a proportion, use the formula: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p}(1 - \hat{p})}{n}} \] where:
  • \( \hat{p} \) is the sample proportion, in this case, 0.48.
  • \( n \) is the sample size, which is 150 in this scenario.
This formula helps quantify the uncertainty inherent in using a sample to estimate a population parameter.
The smaller the standard error, the closer the sample proportion is likely to be to the actual population proportion.
  • It plays a crucial role in constructing confidence intervals by determining the width of the interval.
  • The formula assumes a large sample size, which justifies the use of a normal distribution to approximate the sampling distribution.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each scenario, use the formula to find the standard error of the distribution of differences in sample means, \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) Samples of size 300 from Population 1 with mean 75 and standard deviation 18 and samples of size 500 from Population 2 with mean 83 and standard deviation 22

Football Air Pressure During the NFL's 2014 AFC championship game, officials measured the air pressure on game balls following a tip that one team's balls were under-inflated. In exercise 6.124 we found that the 11 balls measured for the New England Patriots had a mean psi of 11.10 (well below the legal limit) and a standard deviation of 0.40. Patriot supporters could argue that the under-inflated balls were due to the elements and other outside effects. To test this the officials also measured 4 balls from the opposing team (Indianapolis Colts) to be used in comparison and found a mean psi of \(12.63,\) with a standard deviation of 0.12. There is no significant skewness or outliers in the data. Use the t-distribution to determine if the average air pressure in the New England Patriot's balls was significantly less than the average air pressure in the Indianapolis Colt's balls.

A data collection method is described to investigate a difference in means. In each case, determine which data analysis method is more appropriate: paired data difference in means or difference in means with two separate groups. A study investigating the effect of exercise on brain activity recruits sets of identical twins in middle age, in which one twin is randomly assigned to engage in regular exercise and the other doesn't exercise.

Metal Tags on Penguins and Breeding Success Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying metal tags is detrimental to penguins. Exercise 6.148 investigates the survival rate of the penguins. The scientists also studied the breeding success of the metal- and electronic-tagged penguins. Metal-tagged penguins successfully produced offspring in \(32 \%\) of the 122 total breeding seasons, while the electronic-tagged penguins succeeded in \(44 \%\) of the 160 total breeding seasons. Construct a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion successfully producing offspring \(\left(p_{M}-p_{E}\right)\). Interpret the result.

Can Malaria Parasites Control Mosquito Behavior? Are malaria parasites able to control mosquito behavior to their advantage? A study \(^{43}\) investigated this question by taking mosquitos and giving them the opportunity to have their first "blood meal" from a mouse. The mosquitoes were randomized to either eat from a mouse infected with malaria or an uninfected mouse. At several time points after this, mosquitoes were put into a cage with a human and it was recorded whether or not each mosquito approached the human (presumably to bite, although mosquitoes were caught before biting). Once infected, the malaria parasites in the mosquitoes go through two stages: the Oocyst stage in which the mosquito has been infected but is not yet infectious to others and then the Sporozoite stage in which the mosquito is infectious to others. Malaria parasites would benefit if mosquitoes sought risky blood meals (such as biting a human) less often in the Oocyst stage (because mosquitos are often killed while attempting a blood meal) and more often in the Sporozoite stage after becoming infectious (because this is one of the primary ways in which malaria is transmitted). Does exposing mosquitoes to malaria actually impact their behavior in this way? (a) In the Oocyst stage (after eating from mouse but before becoming infectious), 20 out of 113 mosquitoes in the group exposed to malaria approached the human and 36 out of 117 mosquitoes in the group not exposed to malaria approached the human. Calculate the Z-statistic. (b) Calculate the p-value for testing whether this provides evidence that the proportion of mosquitoes in the Oocyst stage approaching the human is lower in the group exposed to malaria. (c) In the Sporozoite stage (after becoming infectious), 37 out of 149 mosquitoes in the group exposed to malaria approached the human and 14 out of 144 mosquitoes in the group not exposed to malaria approached the human. Calculate the z-statistic. (d) Calculate the p-value for testing whether this provides evidence that the proportion of mosquitoes in the Sporozoite stage approaching the human is higher in the group exposed to malaria. (e) Based on your p-values, make conclusions about what you have learned about mosquito behavior, stage of infection, and exposure to malaria or not. (f) Can we conclude that being exposed to malaria (as opposed to not being exposed to malaria) causes these behavior changes in mosquitoes? Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.