/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 148 Metal Tags on Penguins and Survi... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Metal Tags on Penguins and Survival Data 1.3 on page 10 discusses a study designed to test whether applying metal tags is detrimental to penguins. One variable examined is the survival rate 10 years after tagging. The scientists observed that 10 of the 50 metal tagged penguins survived, compared to 18 of the 50 electronic tagged penguins. Construct a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion surviving between the metal and electronic tagged penguins \(\left(p_{M}-p_{E}\right)\). Interpret the result.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in survival proportions between metal-tagged and electronic-tagged penguins is \([-0.30945, -0.05054]\).

Step by step solution

01

Calculate the Proportions

First, calculate the proportions of surviving penguins for both groups. This can be done by dividing the number of survivors in each group by the total number of individuals in that group: \n\[\hat{p_{M}} = \frac{10}{50} = 0.2\] and\n\[\hat{p_{E}} = \frac{18}{50} = 0.36\]
02

Compute the Standard Error

Next, calculate the standard error using the following formula: \n\[\sqrt{\frac{\hat{p_{M}} \cdot (1-\hat{p_{M}})}{n_{M}} + \frac{\hat{p_{E}} \cdot (1-\hat{p_{E}})}{n_{E}}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.2 \cdot 0.8}{50} + \frac{0.36 \cdot 0.64}{50}} = 0.09173...\]
03

Determine the Critical Value

Then find the critical value from the standard normal distribution that corresponds to the midpoint of the desired \(90 \%\) confidence interval. The critical value \( z_{\alpha / 2} = 1.645\) for a \(90 \%\) confidence interval.
04

Construct the Confidence Interval

Finally, construct the difference's confidence interval by adding and subtracting the critical value times the standard error from the difference in survival rates: \n\[\hat{p_{M}} - \hat{p_{E}} \pm z_{\alpha /2} * SE = 0.2 - 0.36 \pm 1.645 * 0.09173 = [-0.30945, -0.05054]\]
05

Interpret the Results

Interpretation of the confidence interval says that with \(90 \%\) confidence, the true difference in survival proportion between metal-tagged penguins and electronic-tagged penguins lies between \(-0.30945\) and \(-0.05054\). This interval does not include zero, suggesting that there may be a real difference in survival rates between the two tagging groups, with the electronic-tagged penguins surviving at a higher rate.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Proportion
In statistics, a proportion refers to the fraction of the total that possesses a certain characteristic. It's expressed as a ratio or percentage. In the context of our penguin study, we are interested in the survival rates of the tagged penguins. For the metal tagged penguins, the proportion of survivors is calculated as \[ \hat{p_{M}} = \frac{10}{50} = 0.2 \] This means 20% of the metal tagged penguins survived. Similarly, for the electronic tagged penguins, the proportion is \[ \hat{p_{E}} = \frac{18}{50} = 0.36 \] indicating 36% survived.
  • Proportion helps us quickly understand the share of a group exhibiting a particular trait.
  • It provides a way to compare different groups, such as metal versus electronic tagged penguins.
Using proportions allows us to directly compare different groups and deduce which one performed better in terms of survival, as done in this study.
Standard Error
Standard error is a measure that quantifies the amount of variability or dispersion of a sample statistic from the population parameter. It estimates how much the sample mean (or proportion) would vary if you drew multiple samples from the same population. In our penguin study, the standard error helps us understand the variability in the difference between the two proportions.
  • A smaller standard error indicates less variability among sample statistics, meaning our sample estimate is more precise.
  • A larger standard error generally indicates more variability, leading to less confidence in the sample statistic as an estimate of the population parameter.
To calculate the standard error of the difference between two proportions, we use the formula: \[ SE = \sqrt{\frac{\hat{p_{M}} \cdot (1-\hat{p_{M}})}{n_{M}} + \frac{\hat{p_{E}} \cdot (1-\hat{p_{E}})}{n_{E}}} = 0.09173 \] This provides a measure of how much the sample proportions (0.2 and 0.36) are expected to vary due to sampling error.
Critical Value
The critical value is a key component in inferential statistics, used to denote the threshold at which the null hypothesis is rejected in a significance test. In constructing confidence intervals, it helps us determine the margin we allow around our point estimate.
  • The critical value is derived from a probability distribution, commonly the standard normal distribution in cases involving proportions.
  • For a given confidence level, the critical value indicates the z-score at which the remaining probability is equally split between the tails of the distribution.
In our penguin study, to construct a 90% confidence interval, the critical value is \( z_{\alpha / 2} = 1.645 \). This z-score corresponds to the tails containing 5% of the data each (10% of total), leaving 90% in the center. By using this value, we establish how far values can deviate from the estimated difference in proportions, \(\hat{p_{M}} - \hat{p_{E}}\), while still being within the confidence interval.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Use a t-distribution to answer the question. Assume the sample is a random sample from a distribution that is reason ably normally distributed and we are doing inference for a sample mean. Find the area in a t-distribution above 2.3 if the sample has size \(n=6\).

Left-Handed Lawyers Approximately \(10 \%\) of Americans are left-handed (we will treat this as a known population parameter). A study on the relationship between handedness and profession found that in a random sample of 105 lawyers, 16 of them were left-handed. \({ }^{13}\) Test the hypothesis that the proportion of left-handed lawyers differs from the proportion of left-handed Americans. (a) Clearly state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Calculate the test statistic and p-value. (c) What do we conclude at the \(5 \%\) significance level? At the \(10 \%\) significance level?

In Exercises 6.139 to \(6.142,\) use the normal distribution to find a confidence interval for a difference in proportions \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) given the relevant sample results. Give the best estimate for \(p_{1}-p_{2},\) the margin of error, and the confidence interval. Assume the results come from random samples. A 95\% confidence interval for \(p_{1}-p_{2}\) given counts of 240 yes out of 500 sampled for Group 1 and 450 ves out of 1000 sampled for Group \(2 .\)

Number of Fouls in a Season by NBA Players The variable Fouls in the dataset NBAPlayers2015 shows the total number of fouls during the \(2014-2015\) season for all players in the \(\mathrm{NBA}\) (National Basketball Association) who played at least 24 minutes per game that season. We use this group as a sample of all NBA players in all seasons who play regularly. Use this information to test whether there is evidence that NBA players who play regularly have a mean number of fouls in a season less than 160 (or roughly 2 fouls per game).

Do Ovulating Women Affect Men's Speech? Studies suggest that when young men interact with a woman who is in the fertile period of her menstrual cycle, they pick up subconsciously on subtle changes in her skin tone, voice, and scent. A study introduced in Exercise \(\mathrm{B} .23\) suggests that men may even change their speech patterns around ovulating women. The men were randomly divided into two groups with one group paired with a woman in the fertile phase of her cycle and the other group with a woman in a different stage of her cycle. The same women were used in the two different stages. For the men paired with a less fertile woman, 38 of the 61 men copied their partner's sentence construction in a task to describe an object. For the men paired with a woman at peak fertility, 30 of the 62 men copied their partner's sentence construction. The experimenters hypothesized that men might be less likely to copy their partner during peak fertility in a (subconscious) attempt to attract more attention to themselves. Use the normal distribution to test at a \(5 \%\) level whether the proportion of men copying sentence structure is less when the woman is at peak fertility.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.