/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 192 Exercises 6.192 and 6.193 examin... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exercises 6.192 and 6.193 examine the results of a study \(^{45}\) investigating whether fast food consumption increases one's concentration of phthalates, an ingredient in plastics that has been linked to multiple health problems including hormone disruption. The study included 8,877 people who recorded all the food they ate over a 24 -hour period and then provided a urine sample. Two specific phthalate byproducts were measured (in \(\mathrm{ng} / \mathrm{mL}\) ) in the urine: DEHP and DiNP. Find and interpret a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference, \(\mu_{F}-\mu_{N},\) in mean concentration between people who have eaten fast food in the last 24 hours and those who haven't. The mean concentration of DEHP in the 3095 participants who had eaten fast food was \(\bar{x}_{F}=83.6\) with \(s_{F}=194.7\) while the mean for the 5782 participants who had not eaten fast food was \(\bar{x}_{N}=59.1\) with \(s_{N}=152.1\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
The 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean concentration of DEHP between people who have eaten fast food in the last 24 hours and those who haven't is from 13.64 ng/mL to 35.36 ng/mL.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Given Data

First, you need to identify the given data. For the people who have eaten fast food, you have \( n_{F} = 3095, \bar{x}_{F} = 83.6, s_{F} = 194.7 \). For those who have not eaten fast food, you have \( n_{N} = 5782, \bar{x}_{N} = 59.1, s_{N} = 152.1 \). These values will be used to calculate the difference between the two means, along with the standard error for that difference.
02

Calculate Difference Between Means

Next, calculate the difference between the two sample means, \( \bar{x}_{F} - \bar{x}_{N} = 83.6 - 59.1 = 24.5 \) ng/mL. This is the observed difference in mean concentration of DEHP between the two groups.
03

Calculate Standard Error for Difference

The standard error for the difference between two means is given by the formula \[ SE = \sqrt { \frac {s_{F}^2}{n_{F}} + \frac {s_{N}^2}{n_{N}} } \], substituting the given values gives \[ SE = \sqrt { \frac {194.7^2}{3095} + \frac {152.1^2}{5782} } = 5.54 \] ng/mL.
04

Construct Confidence Interval

Lastly, construct the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the means using the formula \[ CI = (\bar{x}_{F} - \bar{x}_{N}) \pm Z*SE \] where Z is the Z-score for desired confidence level (1.96 for 95% confidence level). So \[ CI = 24.5 \pm 1.96*5.54 = 24.5 \pm 10.86 \]. Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the mean concentrations of DEHP for people who have eaten fast food and those who haven't ranges from 13.64 ng/mL to 35.36 ng/mL.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis involves the process of collecting, reviewing, and interpreting data to make informed conclusions. In this context, it becomes essential to make sense of the data gathered from a significant number of participants in the study. Here, we gathered important details such as the number of participants in each group, along with their mean DEHP concentrations and standard deviations.
  • People who consumed fast food had a mean DEHP concentration of 83.6 ng/mL.
  • People who did not consume fast food had a mean DEHP concentration of 59.1 ng/mL.
Using these values, statistical analysis helps in determining whether the observed differences in the DEHP levels are significant or could be due to random chance. Ultimately, the method helps researchers decide if there's a substantial association between fast food consumption and DEHP levels.
A key element of statistical analysis is determining confidence intervals, which represent the range where the true population parameter is expected to fall for a given confidence level.
Mean Differences
When comparing two groups in statistical studies, the difference in means between the groups is critical in identifying possible effects or trends. We often calculate these differences to see if one group has significantly higher or lower values than another.
For our exercise, the mean difference is calculated as:
  • The mean for fast food consumers (\(ar{x}_F=83.6g/mL\)) minus the mean for non-consumers (\(ar{x}_N=59.1g/mL\)).
  • This results in a mean difference of 24.5 ng/mL, indicating that on average, fast food consumers have higher DEHP levels.
This step is fundamental, as it provides a basic understanding of the extent of variation due to the variable under examination (in this case, fast food consumption).
However, the mean difference alone does not provide us with information about the reliability or significance of this difference, which is where further statistical analysis, such as calculating the confidence interval, comes into play.
Standard Error
Standard error (SE) is a crucial concept in statistics that helps measure the accuracy with which a sample represents a population. It estimates how much the sample mean is likely to fluctuate from the true population mean. In simpler terms, it tells us about the precision of the mean difference in our context.
Calculating the standard error involves the formula:\[ SE = \sqrt { \frac {s_F^2}{n_F} + \frac {s_N^2}{n_N} } \]For this exercise:
  • \(s_F\) and \(n_F\) are the standard deviation and sample size for fast food consumers.
  • \(s_N\) and \(n_N\) are for non-consumers.
  • The calculated SE is 5.54 ng/mL.
The standard error tells us that the observed difference in mean concentrations could vary by this much due to random sampling variability.
In more formal statistical testing, the SE is used along with confidence intervals and hypothesis testing to understand more about the impact of study factors, such as fast food consumption on phthalate levels. It represents the potential error involved in estimating the true mean difference between larger populations.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Gender Bias In a study \(^{52}\) examining gender bias, a nationwide sample of 127 science professors evaluated the application materials of an undergraduate student who had ostensibly applied for a laboratory manager position. All participants received the same materials, which were randomly assigned either the name of a male \(\left(n_{m}=63\right)\) or the name of a female \(\left(n_{f}=64\right) .\) Participants believed that they were giving feedback to the applicant, including what salary could be expected. The average salary recommended for the male applicant was \(\$ 30,238\) with a standard deviation of \(\$ 5152\) while the average salary recommended for the (identical) female applicant was \(\$ 26,508\) with a standard deviation of \(\$ 7348\). Does this provide evidence of a gender bias, in which applicants with male names are given higher recommended salaries than applicants with female names? Show all details of the test.

Close Confidants and Social Networking Sites Exercise 6.93 introduces a study \(^{48}\) in which 2006 randomly selected US adults (age 18 or older) were asked to give the number of people in the last six months "with whom you discussed matters that are important to you." The average number of close confidants for the full sample was \(2.2 .\) In addition, the study asked participants whether or not they had a profile on a social networking site. For the 947 participants using a social networking site, the average number of close confidants was 2.5 with a standard deviation of 1.4 , and for the other 1059 participants who do not use a social networking site, the average was 1.9 with a standard deviation of \(1.3 .\) Find and interpret a \(90 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in means between the two groups.

Use the t-distribution to find a confidence interval for a difference in means \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) given the relevant sample results. Give the best estimate for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2},\) the margin of error, and the confidence interval. Assume the results come from random samples from populations that are approximately normally distributed. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) using the sample results \(\bar{x}_{1}=5.2, s_{1}=2.7, n_{1}=10\) and \(\bar{x}_{2}=4.9, s_{2}=2.8, n_{2}=8 .\)

For each scenario, use the formula to find the standard error of the distribution of differences in sample means, \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) Samples of size 100 from Population 1 with mean 87 and standard deviation 12 and samples of size 80 from Population 2 with mean 81 and standard deviation 15

For each scenario, use the formula to find the standard error of the distribution of differences in sample means, \(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2}\) Samples of size 300 from Population 1 with mean 75 and standard deviation 18 and samples of size 500 from Population 2 with mean 83 and standard deviation 22

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.