/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 161 A confidence interval for a samp... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

A confidence interval for a sample is given, followed by several hypotheses to test using that sample. In each case, use the confidence interval to give a conclusion of the test (if possible) and also state the significance level you are using. A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(p: 0.48\) to 0.57 (a) \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.5\) (b) \(H_{0}: p=0.75\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.75\) (c) \(H_{0}: p=0.4\) vs \(H_{a}: p \neq 0.4\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
a) Cannot reject \(H_0: p=0.5\) at a 5% significance level. b) Reject \(H_0: p=0.75\) at a 5% significance level. c) Cannot reject \(H_0: p=0.4\) at a 5% significance level.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the Confidence Interval

Content for Step 1: A 95% confidence interval for the population proportion \(p\) is given as from 0.48 to 0.57. This means that we are 95% confident that the true proportion is within this range.
02

Test Null Hypothesis (a)

Content for Step 2: The null hypothesis \(H_0: p=0.5\) falls within the range of the confidence interval. Thus, we cannot reject the null hypothesis at a 5% significance level.
03

Test Null Hypothesis (b)

Content for Step 3: The null hypothesis \(H_0: p=0.75\) falls outside of the range of the confidence interval. Thus, we reject the null hypothesis at a 5% significance level.
04

Test Null Hypothesis (c)

Content for Step 4: The null hypothesis \(H_0: p=0.4\) falls within the range of the confidence interval. Thus, we cannot reject the null hypothesis at a 5% significance level.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis Testing is a statistical method used to make a decision about a population parameter based on sample data. The idea is to test a hypothesis by examining and interpreting the data to determine whether there is enough evidence to reject the initial assumption known as the null hypothesis (usually represented as \(H_0\)).

For example, if we want to assess a population proportion \(p\), we start by assuming a null hypothesis, such as \(H_0: p = 0.5\). This means we believe the true proportion is 0.5 before gathering evidence. To challenge this, we have an alternative hypothesis \(H_a\), such as \(p eq 0.5\), suggesting the proportion is not 0.5.

In practice, we use sample data to calculate a test statistic. This help us decide between the null hypothesis \(H_0\) and alternative hypothesis \(H_a\). Additionally, a confidence interval provides a range in which the true parameter is expected to fall. If the null hypothesis' value is within this interval, we can't reject \(H_0\). Otherwise, we might reject \(H_0\) in favor of \(H_a\).
Significance Level
The significance level, often denoted by \(\alpha\), is a critical component of hypothesis testing. It's the threshold for determining whether a statistical result is sufficiently extreme to reject the null hypothesis. Commonly, a significance level of 5% (or 0.05) is used. If the p-value, derived from the test statistic, is less than \(\alpha\), we reject the null hypothesis.

In the context of our sample problem, we used a 5% significance level. This level signifies a 5% risk of concluding that a difference exists when there is no actual difference. With a 95% confidence interval, the complementary 5% represents the significance level. If a hypothesized population proportion falls outside the confidence interval, the evidence suggests rejecting the null hypothesis. This was the case for the null hypothesis \(H_0: p = 0.75\), where the value 0.75 lies outside the interval \(0.48\) to \(0.57\). Thus, at the 5% level, this hypothesized value is classified as unlikely.
Population Proportion
The population proportion, denoted as \(p\), represents the fraction of the total population that possesses a particular attribute of interest. For instance, if we're interested in the proportion of people in a town who support a local policy, \(p\) would be the fraction of supporters among the whole population.

When conducting hypothesis testing regarding the population proportion, we estimate \(p\) using the proportion observed in a sample, \(\hat{p}\). This sample proportion is used to create a confidence interval, which is a range around the sample proportion within which we expect the true population proportion to lie with a certain level of confidence.

In the given exercise, a confidence interval from 0.48 to 0.57 suggests that the true population proportion \(p\) is most likely between these values. When conducting hypothesis tests as in parts (a), (b), and (c) of the exercise, checking if \(H_0\)'s hypothesized value (like 0.5, 0.75, or 0.4) is inside or outside this range helps determine whether the null hypothesis can be rejected.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Polling 1000 people in a large community to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the percentage of people in the community living in a mobile home is greater then \(10 \%\).

Data 4.3 on page 265 introduces a situation in which a restaurant chain is measuring the levels of arsenic in chicken from its suppliers. The question is whether there is evidence that the mean level of arsenic is greater than \(80 \mathrm{ppb},\) so we are testing \(H_{0}: \mu=80\) vs \(H_{a}:\) \(\mu>80,\) where \(\mu\) represents the average level of arsenic in all chicken from a certain supplier. It takes money and time to test for arsenic, so samples are often small. Suppose \(n=6\) chickens from one supplier are tested, and the levels of arsenic (in ppb) are: \(\begin{array}{llllll}68, & 75, & 81, & 93, & 95, & 134\end{array}\) (a) What is the sample mean for the data? (b) Translate the original sample data by the appropriate amount to create a new dataset in which the null hypothesis is true. How do the sample size and standard deviation of this new dataset compare to the sample size and standard deviation of the original dataset? (c) Write the six new data values from part (b) on six cards. Sample from these cards with replacement to generate one randomization sample. (Select a card at random, record the value, put it back, select another at random, until you have a sample of size \(6,\) to match the original sample size.) List the values in the sample and give the sample mean. (d) Generate 9 more simulated samples, for a total of 10 samples for a randomization distribution. Give the sample mean in each case and create a small dotplot. Use an arrow to locate the original sample mean on your dotplot.

Exercise 2.19 on page 58 introduces a study examining whether giving antibiotics in infancy increases the likelihood that the child will be overweight. Prescription records were examined to determine whether or not antibiotics were prescribed during the first year of a child's life, and each child was classified as overweight or not at age 12. (Exercise 2.19 looked at the results for age 9.) The researchers compared the proportion overweight in each group. The study concludes that: "Infants receiving antibiotics in the first year of life were more likely to be overweight later in childhood compared with those who were unexposed \((32.4 \%\) versus \(18.2 \%\) at age 12 \(P=0.002) "\) (a) What is the explanatory variable? What is the response variable? Classify each as categorical or quantitative. (b) Is this an experiment or an observational study? (c) State the null and alternative hypotheses and define the parameters. (d) Give notation and the value of the relevant sample statistic. (e) Use the p-value to give the formal conclusion of the test (Reject \(H_{0}\) or Do not reject \(H_{0}\) ) and to give an indication of the strength of evidence for the result. (f) Can we conclude that whether or not children receive antibiotics in infancy causes the difference in proportion classified as overweight?

Influencing Voters When getting voters to support a candidate in an election, is there a difference between a recorded phone call from the candidate or a flyer about the candidate sent through the mail? A sample of 500 voters is randomly divided into two groups of 250 each, with one group getting the phone call and one group getting the flyer. The voters are then contacted to see if they plan to vote for the candidate in question. We wish to see if there is evidence that the proportions of support are different between the two methods of campaigning. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Possible sample results are shown in Table 4.3 . Compute the two sample proportions: \(\hat{p}_{c},\) the proportion of voters getting the phone call who say they will vote for the candidate, and \(\hat{p}_{f},\) the proportion of voters getting the flyer who say they will vote for the candidate. Is there a difference in the sample proportions? (c) A different set of possible sample results are shown in Table 4.4. Compute the same two sample proportions for this table. (d) Which of the two samples seems to offer stronger evidence of a difference in effectiveness between the two campaign methods? Explain your reasoning. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Vote } \\ \text { Sample A } \end{array} & \text { for Candidate } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Will Not Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Phone call } & 152 & 98 \\ \text { Flyer } & 145 & 105 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Sample B } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Not Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Phone call } & 188 & 62 \\ \text { Flyer } & 120 & 130 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Exercise 4.113 refers to a survey used to assess the ignorance of the public to global population trends. A similar survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, where respondents were asked if they had a university degree. One question asked, "In the last 20 years the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty has \(\ldots, "\) and three choices 2) "remained more or were provided: 1\()^{\text {6i }}\) increased" less the same," and 3) "decreased." Of 373 university degree holders, 45 responded with the correct answer: decreased; of 639 non-degree respondents, 57 responded with the correct answer. \({ }^{35}\) We would like to test if the percent of correct answers is significantly different between degree holders and non- degree holders. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Using StatKey or other technology, construct a randomization distribution and compute the p-value. (c) State the conclusion in context.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.