/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 160 Hypotheses for a statistical tes... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 4: Problem 160

Hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu_{1}=\mu_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu_{1} \neq \mu_{2} .\) In addition, in each case for which the results are significant, state which group ( 1 or 2 ) has the larger mean. (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) : 0.12 to 0.54 (b) \(99 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) : -2.1 to 5.4 (c) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\) : -10.8 to -3.7

Short Answer

Expert verified
Based on the given confidence intervals, we reject the null hypothesis for samples (a) and (c) and fail to reject it for sample (b). In case (a), group 1 has a larger mean. In case (b), we cannot determine which group has a larger mean. In case (c), group 2 has a larger mean.

Step by step solution

01

Interpret Confidence Interval (a)

A 95% confidence interval for \( \mu_{1} - \mu_{2} \) ranges from 0.12 to 0.54. This interval excludes 0, hence we reject the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_{1} = \mu_{2} \) at the 5% significance level. The positive difference suggests that group 1 has a larger mean.
02

Interpret Confidence Interval (b)

A 99% confidence interval for \( \mu_{1} - \mu_{2} \) ranges from -2.1 to 5.4. This interval contains 0, hence we fail to reject the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_{1} = \mu_{2} \) at the 1% significance level. We cannot conclude which group has a larger mean.
03

Interpret Confidence Interval (c)

A 90% confidence interval for \( \mu_{1} - \mu_{2} \) ranges from -10.8 to -3.7. This interval also excludes 0; hence we reject the null hypothesis \( H_0: \mu_{1} = \mu_{2} \) at the 10% significance level. The negative difference suggests that group 2 has a larger mean.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Confidence Interval Interpretation
When you're interpreting a confidence interval, you're essentially trying to understand the range within which you can expect your statistical parameter to fall.
  • A confidence interval provides an estimated range derived from a sample dataset.
  • It shows where you might find the true difference between the means in the whole population if you sampled the population over and over again.
For instance, if a 95% confidence interval for \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \) ranges from 0.12 to 0.54, it means that we are 95% confident that the true mean difference is somewhere between these numbers. Crucially, if a confidence interval doesn't include 0,it suggests that there is a significant difference between the means of the two groups. In other words, the null hypothesis can often be rejected, indicating that a real effect or difference exists between the groups. Conversely, if 0 is inside the interval, it implies there's no significant difference, as seen in example (b) where the interval was -2.1 to 5.4.Here, we conclude that we cannot reject the null hypothesis.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \( \alpha \), is a threshold set by the researcher which determines how strong the evidence must be to reject the null hypothesis. It's foundational in hypothesis testing because:
  • It reflects our tolerance for making a Type I error: erroneously rejecting a true null hypothesis.
  • A lower significance level implies stricter criteria for rejecting the null hypothesis.
  • Common levels of significance are 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10, corresponding to confidence levels of 95%, 99%, and 90% respectively.
In this context, if our 95% confidence interval for \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \) is between 0.12 and 0.54,we reject the null hypothesis at a significance level of 5% (\( \alpha = 0.05 \)).It implies that there is less than a 5% probability that the results observed are due to random chance.Significance levels critically aid us in determining whether the observed effects are "real" or merely the consequence of random sampling error.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
To conduct a statistical test, one starts by defining the null and alternative hypotheses. These form the cornerstone of any hypothesis testing framework.
  • The **null hypothesis** (\( H_0 \): \( \mu_1 = \mu_2 \)) posits that there is no difference between the population means.
  • The **alternative hypothesis** (\( H_a \): \( \mu_1 eq \mu_2 \)) suggests there is some difference.
The null hypothesis serves as the default or status quo, while the alternative hypothesis is what the researcher aims to support.In practice, we use data to test whether we can confidently refute the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative. When the confidence interval for the difference \( \mu_1 - \mu_2 \) excludes zero, we have reason to reject the null hypothesis and thus infer a difference.When it includes zero, however, as in interval case (b) from -2.1 to 5.4, we lack the statistical evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that any observed difference could be due to chance rather than an actual effect.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Scientists studying lion attacks on humans in Tanzania \(^{32}\) found that 95 lion attacks happened between \(6 \mathrm{pm}\) and \(10 \mathrm{pm}\) within either five days before a full moon or five days after a full moon. Of these, 71 happened during the five days after the full moon while the other 24 happened during the five days before the full moon. Does this sample of lion attacks provide evidence that attacks are more likely after a full moon? In other words, is there evidence that attacks are not equally split between the two five-day periods? Use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value, and be sure to show all details of the test. (Note that this is a test for a single proportion since the data come from one sample.)

By some accounts, the first formal hypothesis test to use statistics involved the claim of a lady tasting tea. \({ }^{11}\) In the 1920 's Muriel Bristol- Roach, a British biological scientist, was at a tea party where she claimed to be able to tell whether milk was poured into a cup before or after the tea. R.A. Fisher, an eminent statistician, was also attending the party. As a natural skeptic, Fisher assumed that Muriel had no ability to distinguish whether the milk or tea was poured first, and decided to test her claim. An experiment was designed in which Muriel would be presented with some cups of tea with the milk poured first, and some cups with the tea poured first. (a) In plain English (no symbols), describe the null and alternative hypotheses for this scenario. (b) Let \(p\) be the true proportion of times Muriel can guess correctly. State the null and alternative hypothesis in terms of \(p\).

An article noted that it may be possible to accurately predict which way a penalty-shot kicker in soccer will direct his shot. \({ }^{27}\) The study finds that certain types of body language by a soccer player \(-\) called "tells"-can be accurately read to predict whether the ball will go left or right. For a given body movement leading up to the kick, the question is whether there is strong evidence that the proportion of kicks that go right is significantly different from one-half. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses in this situation? (b) If sample results for one type of body movement give a p-value of 0.3184 , what is the conclusion of the test? Should a goalie learn to distinguish this movement? (c) If sample results for a different type of body movement give a p-value of \(0.0006,\) what is the conclusion of the test? Should a goalie learn to distinguish this movement?

The null and alternative hypotheses for a test are given as well as some information about the actual sample(s) and the statistic that is computed for each randomization sample. Indicate where the randomization distribution will be centered. In addition, indicate whether the test is a left-tail test, a right-tail test, or a twotailed test. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu=10\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu>10\) Sample: \(\bar{x}=12, s=3.8, n=40\)

It is well established that exercise is beneficial for our bodies. Recent studies appear to indicate that exercise can also do wonders for our brains, or, at least, the brains of mice. In a randomized experiment, one group of mice was given access to a running wheel while a second group of mice was kept sedentary. According to an article describing the study, "The brains of mice and rats that were allowed to run on wheels pulsed with vigorous, newly born neurons, and those animals then breezed through mazes and other tests of rodent IQ"9 compared to the sedentary mice. Studies are examining the reasons for these beneficial effects of exercise on rodent (and perhaps human) intelligence. High levels of BMP (bonemorphogenetic protein) in the brain seem to make stem cells less active, which makes the brain slower and less nimble. Exercise seems to reduce the level of BMP in the brain. Additionally, exercise increases a brain protein called noggin, which improves the brain's ability. Indeed, large doses of noggin turned mice into "little mouse geniuses," according to Dr. Kessler, one of the lead authors of the study. While research is ongoing in determining how strong the effects are, all evidence points to the fact that exercise is good for the brain. Several tests involving these studies are described. In each case, define the relevant parameters and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (a) Testing to see if there is evidence that mice allowed to exercise have lower levels of BMP in the brain on average than sedentary mice. (b) Testing to see if there is evidence that mice allowed to exercise have higher levels of noggin in the brain on average than sedentary mice. (c) Testing to see if there is evidence of a negative correlation between the level of BMP and the level of noggin in the brains of mice.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Calculus

Read Explanation

Logic and Functions

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Mechanics Maths

Read Explanation

Pure Maths

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.