/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 33 Utilizing the census of a commun... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Utilizing the census of a community, which includes information about all residents of the community, to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the percentage of people in the community living in a mobile home is greater than \(10 \%\).

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solution depends on the census data as it is quantitatively evaluated. If the z-score from the One-Proportion Z-test is greater than the critical z-score, then the claim that more than 10% of the population live in mobile homes is statistically significant.

Step by step solution

01

Preparing the Data

Compile the census data and count the number of residents living in mobile homes. This number represents the successes in your sample. The total number of residents is your sample size.
02

State the Hypotheses

The null hypothesis, \(H_0\), is the status quo, which states the proportion of people living in mobile homes is 10 percent or less. The alternative hypothesis, \(H_1\), claims that the proportion is greater than 10 percent.
03

Perform a One-Proportion Z-Test

Conduct the One-Proportion Z-Test using the collected census data, the hypothesized proportion (0.10 for 10 percent), and the significance level. The formula for z-score is: \( z = (\hat{p} - p_0) / sqrt((p_0(1-p_0))/n) \) where \(\hat{p}\) is the sample proportion, \(p_0\) is the hypothesized proportion and \(n\) is the sample size.
04

Interpret the Result

Based on the outcome of the z-test, reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. If the calculated z-score is greater than the critical z-score, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the percentage of people in the community living in a mobile home is greater than 10 percent.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental method in statistics used to decide whether there is enough evidence from a sample of data to infer that a certain condition is true for the entire population. In the context of determining the percentage of people living in mobile homes in a community, hypothesis testing allows us to assess whether the observed sample proportion significantly deviates from a previously established or hypothesized population proportion. The process involves setting up two competing hypotheses, calculating a test statistic from the sample data, and comparing this statistic to a critical value to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

For instance, if you want to determine whether a new teaching method is more effective than the traditional one, you would set up a hypothesis test with your null hypothesis stating that the new method is not more effective (or equally effective), and your alternative hypothesis claiming it is more effective. You would then collect sample data, perform the appropriate statistical test, and make an inference about the population based on the results.
Null Hypothesis
The null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), represents a statement of no effect or no difference that you aim to test against the alternative hypothesis. It is essentially the default assumption that there is no change, no difference, or no relationship for the general population from which the sample is drawn. In the exercise regarding mobile home residency, the null hypothesis posits that the true proportion of residents living in mobile homes is 10% or less.

In a broader context, the null hypothesis may assert that there is no increase in learning outcomes between two different teaching methods, or that a new drug has no different effect compared to a placebo. It is crucial to formulate the null hypothesis clearly and precisely, as it sets the stage for the possibility of statistical testing to either provide evidence against it or to fail to find such evidence.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, typically denoted as \(H_1\) or \(H_a\), is the statement that represents the outcome the researcher aims to support. It reflects a real effect, a real difference, or a relationship that contradicts the null hypothesis. In our mobile home analysis, the alternative hypothesis claims that the proportion of community residents living in mobile homes is greater than 10%.

The alternative hypothesis is what one hopes to provide evidence for through the collected data. It is also the hypothesis that indicates a new theory or phenomenon that the researcher expects to be true. For example, when testing a new medication, the alternative hypothesis might state that the medication improves patient outcomes more than the existing standard treatment.
Sample Proportion
Sample proportion, denoted as \(\hat{p}\), refers to the percentage of individuals in a sample that exhibit a particular trait or characteristic of interest. It is used to estimate the population proportion, which is the corresponding percentage in the entire population. In the exercise example, the sample proportion would be the number of residents living in mobile homes divided by the total number of residents in the community. The sample proportion is a key component when conducting a one-proportion z-test as it serves as the observed value which will be compared against the hypothesized population proportion, \(p_0\).

A careful calculation of the sample proportion is crucial, as it represents the very evidence that you'll analyze when testing your hypotheses. When collecting sample data, researchers must ensure the sample is representative of the population to obtain an accurate estimate.
Significance Level
The significance level, denoted by \(\alpha\), is the threshold used to determine whether a statistical result is significant. In other words, it's the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true (a type I error). Common significance levels include 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10. Choosing a significance level is an important part of the hypothesis testing process because it influences the sensitivity of the test to detecting an effect or difference when one exists.

In our mobile home community example, if we choose a significance level of 0.05, we are accepting a 5% chance of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis. Lower significance levels result in a more rigorous test, requiring more substantial evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Conversely, higher significance levels increase the chance of finding significance but also increase the risk of a type I error.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Influencing Voters When getting voters to support a candidate in an election, is there a difference between a recorded phone call from the candidate or a flyer about the candidate sent through the mail? A sample of 500 voters is randomly divided into two groups of 250 each, with one group getting the phone call and one group getting the flyer. The voters are then contacted to see if they plan to vote for the candidate in question. We wish to see if there is evidence that the proportions of support are different between the two methods of campaigning. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Possible sample results are shown in Table 4.3 . Compute the two sample proportions: \(\hat{p}_{c},\) the proportion of voters getting the phone call who say they will vote for the candidate, and \(\hat{p}_{f},\) the proportion of voters getting the flyer who say they will vote for the candidate. Is there a difference in the sample proportions? (c) A different set of possible sample results are shown in Table 4.4. Compute the same two sample proportions for this table. (d) Which of the two samples seems to offer stronger evidence of a difference in effectiveness between the two campaign methods? Explain your reasoning. $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \hline & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Vote } \\ \text { Sample A } \end{array} & \text { for Candidate } & \begin{array}{l} \text { Will Not Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Phone call } & 152 & 98 \\ \text { Flyer } & 145 & 105 \\ \hline \end{array} $$ $$ \begin{array}{lcc} \text { Sample B } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} & \begin{array}{c} \text { Will Not Vote } \\ \text { for Candidate } \end{array} \\ \hline \text { Phone call } & 188 & 62 \\ \text { Flyer } & 120 & 130 \\ \hline \end{array} $$

Match the four \(\mathrm{p}\) -values with the appropriate conclusion: (a) The evidence against the null hypothesis is significant, but only at the \(10 \%\) level. (b) The evidence against the null and in favor of the alternative is very strong. (c) There is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, even at the \(10 \%\) level. (d) The result is significant at a \(5 \%\) level but not at a \(1 \%\) level. I. 0.0875 II. 0.5457 III. 0.0217 IV. \(\quad 0.00003\)

Testing 100 right-handed participants on the reaction time of their left and right hands to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the right hand reacts faster than the left.

Hypotheses for a statistical test are given, followed by several possible confidence intervals for different samples. In each case, use the confidence interval to state a conclusion of the test for that sample and give the significance level used. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: \mu=15\) vs \(H_{a}: \mu \neq 15\) (a) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 13.9\) to 16.2 (b) \(95 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 12.7\) to 14.8 (c) \(90 \%\) confidence interval for \(\mu: \quad 13.5\) to 16.5

Flying Home for the Holidays, On Time In Exercise 4.115 on page \(302,\) we compared the average difference between actual and scheduled arrival times for December flights on two major airlines: Delta and United. Suppose now that we are only interested in the proportion of flights arriving more than 30 minutes after the scheduled time. Of the 1,000 Delta flights, 67 arrived more than 30 minutes late, and of the 1,000 United flights, 160 arrived more than 30 minutes late. We are testing to see if this provides evidence to conclude that the proportion of flights that are over 30 minutes late is different between flying United or Delta. (a) State the null and alternative hypothesis. (b) What statistic will be recorded for each of the simulated samples to create the randomization distribution? What is the value of that statistic for the observed sample? (c) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution. Estimate the p-value for the observed statistic found in part (b). (d) At a significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\), what is the conclusion of the test? Interpret in context. (e) Now assume we had only collected samples of size \(75,\) but got essentially the same proportions (5/75 late flights for Delta and \(12 / 75\) late flights for United). Repeating steps (b) through (d) on these smaller samples, do you come to the same conclusion?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.