/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 Testing 100 right-handed partici... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Testing 100 right-handed participants on the reaction time of their left and right hands to determine if there is evidence for the claim that the right hand reacts faster than the left.

Short Answer

Expert verified
We conclude based on the t-test results and the associated p-value, either confirming or disproving the claim that the right hand reacts faster than the left for right-handed individuals.

Step by step solution

01

Step 1. Set Hypotheses

First set up the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis \(H_0\) would be that there is no difference in reaction time between right and left hand. The alternative hypothesis \(H_a\) is that the right hand reacts faster than the left hand.
02

Step 2. Gather and Organize Data

Next, arrange the collected reaction times of left and right hands from the test conducted on 100 right-handed participants. This could be organized in two columns: one for left hand times, and one for right hand times.
03

Step 3. Calculate the Mean Reaction Times

Calculate the mean reaction time for both, the left hand and the right hand. The mean is the total reaction time divided by the number of participants, in this case, 100.
04

Step 4. Conduct t-test

To compare the differences in means between two related groups, a paired-samples t-test is used. Perform the t-test on the means obtained in the previous step. This involves calculating the difference between the means, the standard deviation of differences and finally, the t-value.
05

Step 5. Decision Making

Decide on the null hypothesis based on the t-test results and a predetermined significance level (usually 5%). If the p-value obtained from the t-test is less than the significance level, we reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. This would mean, there is enough evidence to suggest that the reaction times of the right hand are faster.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Paired-samples t-test
The paired-samples t-test is a statistical method used when you want to compare two related samples. In our scenario, we're looking at reaction times for the same people using their left and right hands. This type of test is useful when we suspect that measurements might be related, like when testing pairs of data under different conditions or at different times.

To perform a paired-samples t-test, you start by calculating the difference between each pair of observations (right hand vs. left hand reaction times for each participant). Next, you'll compute the mean and standard deviation of these differences.
  • Calculate the difference: Subtract each left hand reaction time from the corresponding right hand time.
  • Find the mean of these differences; this tells us if there is an average increase or decrease.
  • Compute the standard deviation to understand the spread of those differences.
With these statistics at hand, you calculate the t-value, which allows you to evaluate if the average difference is significantly different from zero. A critical value from the t-distribution is used to judge this, and the corresponding p-value helps us make decisions about our hypotheses.
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
In hypothesis testing, the null and alternative hypotheses are vital. They form the backbone of your statistical test by allowing a framework to decide whether your findings are statistically significant or just due to random chance.

The null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\), assumes no effect or no difference. In our reaction time study, \(H_0\) posits that there's no difference in speed between the left and right hands. Essentially, both hands react at the same speed on average.

The alternative hypothesis, \(H_a\), reflects what the researcher wants to prove. Here, \(H_a\) states that the right hand reacts faster than the left hand. This hypothesis is only accepted if the data provides robust enough evidence to reject \(H_0\).

Setting these hypotheses correctly is crucial, as it influences both the design and interpretation of the statistical test results. Moreover, the hypothesis choice defines the direction of the test and its conclusions.
Reaction Time Study
The reaction time study provides a fascinating glimpse into how quickly individuals respond to various stimuli using different hands. In our example, 100 right-handed participants were tested for their left and right hand response times to see if dominance influenced the process.

This kind of study is not just about observing which hand is faster but involves a detailed statistical procedure to validate any observed differences. By using paired observations, researchers can focus on the exact change within the same individual, making the analysis more robust.

In practical terms, the study involves:
  • Recruiting the subjects: Here, all are right-handed to keep the group homogeneous.
  • Collecting data: Measure the reaction times for both hands under a controlled setting.
  • Analyzing the results: Using the paired-samples t-test to process the data and find significant differences.
This study setup provides insights into how handedness might affect reaction variance and helps build a groundwork for further research into neurological or physical dominance and performance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Data 4.2 on page 263 describes a study of a possible relationship between the perceived malevolence of a team's uniforms and penalties called against the team. In Example 4.36 on page 326 we construct a randomization distribution to test whether there is evidence of a positive correlation between these two variables for NFL teams. The data in MalevolentUniformsNHL has information on uniform malevolence and penalty minutes (standardized as \(z\) -scores) for National Hockey League (NHL) teams. Use StatKey or other technology to perform a test similar to the one in Example 4.36 using the NHL hockey data. Use a \(5 \%\) significance level and be sure to show all details of the test.

In Exercise 3.89 on page \(239,\) we found a \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the difference in proportion of rats showing compassion, using the proportion of female rats minus the proportion of male rats, to be 0.104 to \(0.480 .\) In testing whether there is a difference in these two proportions: (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Using the confidence interval, what is the conclusion of the test? Include an indication of the significance level. (c) Based on this study would you say that female rats or male rats are more likely to show compassion (or are the results inconclusive)?

The same sample statistic is used to test a hypothesis, using different sample sizes. In each case, use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value and indicate whether the results are significant at a \(5 \%\) level. Which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis? Testing \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}\) using \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}=0.45-0.30=0.15\) with each of the following sample sizes: (a) \(\hat{p}_{1}=9 / 20=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=6 / 20=0.30\) (b) \(\hat{p}_{1}=90 / 200=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=60 / 200=0.30\) (c) \(\hat{p}_{1}=900 / 2000=0.45\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=600 / 2000=0.30\)

We are conducting many hypothesis tests to test a claim. In every case, assume that the null hypothesis is true. Approximately how many of the tests will incorrectly find significance? 300 tests using a significance level of \(1 \%\).

Polling 1000 people in a large community to determine the average number of hours a day people watch television.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.