/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 174 Data 4.3 on page 265 introduces ... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Data 4.3 on page 265 introduces a situation in which a restaurant chain is measuring the levels of arsenic in chicken from its suppliers. The question is whether there is evidence that the mean level of arsenic is greater than \(80 \mathrm{ppb},\) so we are testing \(H_{0}: \mu=80\) vs \(H_{a}:\) \(\mu>80,\) where \(\mu\) represents the average level of arsenic in all chicken from a certain supplier. It takes money and time to test for arsenic, so samples are often small. Suppose \(n=6\) chickens from one supplier are tested, and the levels of arsenic (in ppb) are: \(\begin{array}{llllll}68, & 75, & 81, & 93, & 95, & 134\end{array}\) (a) What is the sample mean for the data? (b) Translate the original sample data by the appropriate amount to create a new dataset in which the null hypothesis is true. How do the sample size and standard deviation of this new dataset compare to the sample size and standard deviation of the original dataset? (c) Write the six new data values from part (b) on six cards. Sample from these cards with replacement to generate one randomization sample. (Select a card at random, record the value, put it back, select another at random, until you have a sample of size \(6,\) to match the original sample size.) List the values in the sample and give the sample mean. (d) Generate 9 more simulated samples, for a total of 10 samples for a randomization distribution. Give the sample mean in each case and create a small dotplot. Use an arrow to locate the original sample mean on your dotplot.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The exercise first requires the calculation of the original sample mean, which equals to 91. A hypothesis arbitrary set to 80 is examined by creating new data sets and generating repeated random samples. The variations in these means are then displayed on a dotplot where the original sample mean is indicated.

Step by step solution

01

Calculating Sample Mean

First, calculate the sample mean by adding all the given values and dividing by the total number of values, which is 6 in this case. The data provided includes the arsenic levels of 6 chickens: 68, 75, 81, 93, 95, 134. Hence, the sample mean \(\bar{x} = \frac{(68 + 75 + 81 + 93 + 95 + 134)}{6} = 91\).
02

Generate New Dataset

Translate the original sample data to create a new dataset where the null hypothesis is true (\(\mu = 80\)). This implies subtracting the original sample mean (91) from each data point and then adding the hypothesized mean (80). The new dataset then becomes: 57, 64, 70, 82, 84, 123. The sample size remains the same (n=6) as we are not adding or removing any data points. The standard deviation remains the same because shifting data (adding or subtracting a constant from each data point) does not affect the spread of data.
03

Generate Randomization Sample

For a randomization sample, select 6 data points from the new dataset with replacement (meaning a value can be picked more than once). Let's say the randomly selected observations are 57, 70, 123, 70, 84, 123. Then, calculate the sample mean of this random sample.
04

Repeat Random Sampling

Repeat step 3 nine more times to have a total of ten samples for a randomization distribution. For each of these nine new samples, calculate the sample mean.
05

Create a Dotplot

A dotplot can be used to visually display the variations in the sample means for the ten random samples. On this dotplot, use an arrow to locate the original sample mean (91).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Randomization Test
Understanding the randomization test is crucial for anyone grappling with statistical hypothesis testing. In essence, a randomization test, also known as a permutation test, is a non-parametric method used to test the hypothesis. This technique involves creating numerous simulated samples by randomly reshuffling your dataset. By comparing these shuffled samples against the original data, the randomization test evaluates if the observed data might occur by chance.

Imagine shuffling a deck of cards representing your data points, where the null hypothesis holds true—every shuffle leads to a new possible world under the null hypothesis. By comparing sufficient shuffles against your actual data, you get a sense of whether your original dataset stands out as unusual, or if it's just another possible outcome. This approach doesn't assume a particular distribution, making it versatile and robust, especially with small sample sizes or non-normal data as seen in the chicken arsenic levels case.
Sample Mean Calculation
The sample mean, symbolized as \(\bar{x}\), is a central concept in statistics and represents the average of a set of observations. It is calculated by summing all the values in a sample and dividing by the number of observations in that sample. For instance, with the chicken supplier's arsenic levels, we calculate the sample mean by adding \(68 + 75 + 81 + 93 + 95 + 134\) and dividing by 6, leading to a sample mean of 91 ppb.

This calculation is a straightforward but fundamental step in many statistical analyses, including hypothesis testing. The sample mean serves as the observed estimate of the population mean \(\mu\), which is under scrutiny when testing the null hypothesis \(H_0: \mu = 80\) vs \(H_a: \mu > 80\). The sample mean acts as a pivot point from which the randomization test will generate simulated samples to evaluate the null hypothesis.
Standard Deviation
Standard deviation is a measure of the dispersion or spread of a set of data points in a sample. It reveals how much variation there is from the average (mean). A low standard deviation means that data points are generally close to the mean, while a high standard deviation indicates that the data points are spread out over a wider range of values.

When we manipulate a dataset by adding or subtracting a constant to implement the null hypothesis, this does not affect the standard deviation. The operation shifts all data points uniformly, maintaining their relative distances from each other. Therefore, in the arsenic level example, even after adjusting the data to reflect the null hypothesis, the spread of the original data (as measured by the standard deviation) stays constant. This consistency is key in our statistical toolkit, ensuring that the variability observed in our sample is faithfully represented throughout the randomization test.
Null Hypothesis
At the heart of hypothesis testing lies the null hypothesis, denoted as \(H_0\). It is a statement of no effect or no difference that serves as a starting point for statistical significance testing. In our example, the null hypothesis posits that the mean level of arsenic in the chicken sample is 80 ppb (\(H_0: \mu = 80\)).

The null hypothesis is vital because it allows us to calculate the probability of observing a test statistic at least as extreme as the one we observed, given that the null hypothesis is true. If this probability (p-value) is very low, we have evidence against \(H_0\) and may reject it in favor of the alternative hypothesis, \(H_a\), suggesting a new effect or difference. In the context of the chicken arsenic levels, if the sample mean calculation is significantly higher than 80 ppb, we would consider the evidence against the null hypothesis that the mean arsenic level is not greater than 80 ppb.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

For each situation described, indicate whether it makes more sense to use a relatively large significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.10\) ) or a relatively small significance level (such as \(\alpha=0.01\) ). Testing to see whether taking a vitamin supplement each day has significant health benefits. There are no (known) harmful side effects of the supplement.

Describe tests we might conduct based on Data 2.3 , introduced on page \(69 .\) This dataset, stored in ICUAdmissions, contains information about a sample of patients admitted to a hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU). For each of the research questions below, define any relevant parameters and state the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. Is the average age of ICU patients at this hospital greater than \(50 ?\)

Does the airline you choose affect when you'll arrive at your destination? The dataset DecemberFlights contains the difference between actual and scheduled arrival time from 1000 randomly sampled December flights for two of the major North American airlines, Delta Air Lines and United Air Lines. A negative difference indicates a flight arrived early. We are interested in testing whether the average difference between actual and scheduled arrival time is different between the two airlines. (a) Define any relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Find the sample mean of each group, and calculate the difference in sample means. (c) Use StatKey or other technology to create a randomization distribution and find the p-value. (d) At a significance level of \(\alpha=0.01\), what is the conclusion of the test? Interpret the conclusion in context.

Match the four \(\mathrm{p}\) -values with the appropriate conclusion: (a) The evidence against the null hypothesis is significant, but only at the \(10 \%\) level. (b) The evidence against the null and in favor of the alternative is very strong. (c) There is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, even at the \(10 \%\) level. (d) The result is significant at a \(5 \%\) level but not at a \(1 \%\) level. I. 0.00008 II. 0.0571 III. 0.0368 IV. \(\quad 0.1753\)

Could owning a cat as a child be related to mental illness later in life? Toxoplasmosis is a disease transmitted primarily through contact with cat feces, and has recently been linked with schizophrenia and other mental illnesses. Also, people infected with Toxoplasmosis tend to like cats more and are 2.5 times more likely to get in a car accident, due to delayed reaction times. The CDC estimates that about \(22.5 \%\) of Americans are infected with Toxoplasmosis (most have no symptoms), and this prevalence can be as high as \(95 \%\) in other parts of the world. A study \(^{37}\) randomly selected 262 people registered with the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI), almost all of whom had schizophrenia, and for each person selected, chose two people from families without mental illness who were the same age, sex, and socioeconomic status as the person selected from NAMI. Each participant was asked whether or not they owned a cat as a child. The results showed that 136 of the 262 people in the mentally ill group had owned a cat, while 220 of the 522 people in the not mentally ill group had owned a cat. (a) This is known as a case-control study, where cases are selected as people with a specific disease or trait, and controls are chosen to be people without the disease or trait being studied. Both cases and controls are then asked about some variable from their past being studied as a potential risk factor. This is particularly useful for studying rare diseases (such as schizophrenia), because the design ensures a sufficient sample size of people with the disease. Can casecontrol studies such as this be used to infer a causal relationship between the hypothesized risk factor (e.g., cat ownership) and the disease (e.g., schizophrenia)? Why or why not? (b) In case-control studies, controls are usually chosen to be similar to the cases. For example, in this study each control was chosen to be the same age, sex, and socioeconomic status as the corresponding case. Why choose controls who are similar to the cases? (c) For this study, calculate the relevant difference in proportions; proportion of cases (those with schizophrenia) who owned a cat as a child minus proportion of controls (no mental illness) who owned a cat as a child. (d) For testing the hypothesis that the proportion of cat owners is higher in the schizophrenic group than the control group, use technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate the p-value. (e) Do you think this provides evidence that there is an association between owning a cat as a child and developing schizophrenia? \(^{38}\) Why or why not?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.