/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 114 Exercise 4.113 refers to a surve... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Exercise 4.113 refers to a survey used to assess the ignorance of the public to global population trends. A similar survey was conducted in the United Kingdom, where respondents were asked if they had a university degree. One question asked, "In the last 20 years the proportion of the world population living in extreme poverty has \(\ldots, "\) and three choices 2) "remained more or were provided: 1\()^{\text {6i }}\) increased" less the same," and 3) "decreased." Of 373 university degree holders, 45 responded with the correct answer: decreased; of 639 non-degree respondents, 57 responded with the correct answer. \({ }^{35}\) We would like to test if the percent of correct answers is significantly different between degree holders and non- degree holders. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) Using StatKey or other technology, construct a randomization distribution and compute the p-value. (c) State the conclusion in context.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The solutions to the exercise are: \n(a) Null hypothesis (H0): p1 = p2. Alternative hypothesis (Ha): p1 ≠ p2.\n(b) To get the p-value, first establish the observed difference between the two proportions. Then, generate a randomization distribution and find the proportion of simulated differences that are as considerable as, or more significant than, the observed difference. This is the p-value. \n(c) The conclusion will depend on the calculated p-value and should be stated in context of the problem.

Step by step solution

01

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

To solve this problem, begin by understanding the scenario and formulating the null and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis (H0) is that there's no difference in the percent of correct answers between degree and non-degree holders. So, H0: p1 = p2, where p1 is the proportion of degree holders who gave the correct answer and p2 is the proportion of non-degree holders who gave the correct answer. The alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that there is a significant difference in the percentage of correct answers between degree and non-degree holders. So, Ha: p1 ≠ p2.
02

Construct a Randomization Distribution

To construct the randomization distribution, the difference between the proportions of correct answers for both groups is required. The proportion of correct responses for degree holders is 45/373 = 0.1206, while the proportion for non-degree holders is 57/639 = 0.0892. The observed difference is 0.1206 - 0.0892 = 0.0314 (proportion for degree holders - proportion for non-degree holders). Using a statistical software or an online tool that performs randomization tests for two proportions, simulate several random samples sharing the same overall proportion of success as in the collected data. For each simulation, calculate and record the difference in proportion.
03

Compute the p-value

The p-value is the probability of obtaining the observed difference or a more substantial difference if the null hypothesis is true. Using the randomization distribution generated in the previous step, calculate the proportion of simulated differences that are at least as extreme as the observed difference of 0.0314. This proportion is the p-value. If using software, this computation is typically done automatically.
04

Conclusion

The conclusion depends on the calculated p-value. If p-value < α (commonly 0.05), reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the difference in proportions is statistically significant. On the other hand, if the p-value > α, not sufficient evidence is found to reject the null hypothesis. The conclusion needs to be stated in the context of the problem, i.e., there is/is no statistically significant difference in the percent of correct answers between degree holders and non-degree holders.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Null Hypothesis
In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis, often denoted as \(H_0\), is a statement of no effect or no difference. It represents the assumption that any observed difference is due to sampling or experimental error.
For example, in the context of comparing the percentage of correct answers between two groups—those with a university degree and those without—the null hypothesis would claim that both groups perform equally well.
Specifically, \(H_0: p_1 = p_2\), where \(p_1\) and \(p_2\) stand for the proportions of correct responses in each group. By formulating a null hypothesis, we have a clear statement to test against real-world data.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis, denoted as \(H_a\), contradicts the null hypothesis. It suggests that there is a measurable effect or difference.
For the exercise at hand, the alternative hypothesis posits that there is a significant difference in the proportions of correct answers between the two groups.
Mathematically, \(H_a: p_1 eq p_2\).
The alternative hypothesis is what researchers often hope to prove, as it indicates a new finding or insight that challenges the status quo.
Randomization Distribution
To test hypotheses, we need to understand how data could behave under the null hypothesis.
Randomization distribution helps create this understanding by simulating different scenarios where the null hypothesis holds.
In the exercise, the difference in proportions for correct responses is observed. This difference is simulated multiple times to see if such a result is rare or common, assuming there's no real difference.
Using statistical software, one can generate many samples and recompute differences, crafting a distribution that represents how often certain outcomes occur if \(H_0\) is true.
P-value
The p-value quantifies how well the observed data align with the null hypothesis. It represents the probability of obtaining results at least as extreme as the observed ones, assuming the null is true.
If the computed p-value is low (commonly less than 0.05), it indicates that such an outcome would be rare under the null hypothesis.
In our exercise, the p-value comes from the randomization distribution and signifies whether the difference in proportions is statistically significant or due to random chance.
This small number reveals whether we should question or retain our initial assumptions.
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance helps determine whether the results of our hypothesis test are meaningful.
When the p-value is below a predefined threshold (often 0.05), the results are considered statistically significant. This means the chance of observing such data if \(H_0\) were true is very low.
In the exercise, if the p-value points to statistical significance, this indicates a true difference in correct response rates between groups.
It's a valuable tool for researchers to move from observation to solid conclusion.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

In Exercise 4.16 on page 268 , we describe an observational study investigating a possible relationship between exposure to organophosphate pesticides as measured in urinary metabolites (DAP) and diagnosis of ADHD (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). In reporting the results of this study, the authors \(^{28}\) make the following statements: \- "The threshold for statistical significance was set at \(P<.05 . "\) \- "The odds of meeting the \(\ldots\) criteria for \(\mathrm{ADHD}\) increased with the urinary concentrations of total DAP metabolites" \- "The association was statistically significant." (a) What can we conclude about the p-value obtained in analyzing the data? (b) Based on these statements, can we distinguish whether the evidence of association is very strong vs moderately strong? Why or why not? (c) Can we conclude that exposure to pesticides is related to the likelihood of an ADHD diagnosis? (d) Can we conclude that exposure to pesticides causes more cases of ADHD? Why or why not?

Does consuming beer attract mosquitoes? Exercise 4.17 on page 268 discusses an experiment done in Africa testing possible ways to reduce the spread of malaria by mosquitoes. In the experiment, 43 volunteers were randomly assigned to consume either a liter of beer or a liter of water, and the attractiveness to mosquitoes of each volunteer was measured. The experiment was designed to test whether beer consumption increases mosquito attraction. The report \(^{30}\) states that "Beer consumption, as opposed to water consumption, significantly increased the activation \(\ldots\) of \(A n\). gambiae [mosquitoes] ... \((P<0.001)\)." (a) Is this convincing evidence that consuming beer is associated with higher mosquito attraction? Why or why not? (b) How strong is the evidence for the result? Explain. (c) Based on these results, it is reasonable to conclude that consuming beer causes an increase in mosquito attraction? Why or why not?

The same sample statistic is used to test a hypothesis, using different sample sizes. In each case, use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value and indicate whether the results are significant at a \(5 \%\) level. Which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis? Testing \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}\) using \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}=0.8-0.7=0.10\) with each of the following sample sizes: (a) \(\hat{p}_{1}=24 / 30=0.8\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=14 / 20=0.7\) (b) \(\hat{p}_{1}=240 / 300=0.8\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=140 / 200=0.7\)

Exercises 4.59 to 4.64 give null and alternative hypotheses for a population proportion, as well as sample results. Use StatKey or other technology to generate a randomization distribution and calculate a p-value. StatKey tip: Use "Test for a Single Proportion" and then "Edit Data" to enter the sample information. Hypotheses: \(H_{0}: p=0.5\) vs \(H_{a}: p>0.5\) Sample data: \(\hat{p}=30 / 50=0.60\) with \(n=50\)

In this exercise, we see that it is possible to use counts instead of proportions in testing a categorical variable. Data 4.7 describes an experiment to investigate the effectiveness of the two drugs desipramine and lithium in the treatment of cocaine addiction. The results of the study are summarized in Table 4.14 on page \(323 .\) The comparison of lithium to the placebo is the subject of Example 4.34 . In this exercise, we test the success of desipramine against a placebo using a different statistic than that used in Example 4.34. Let \(p_{d}\) and \(p_{c}\) be the proportion of patients who relapse in the desipramine group and the control group, respectively. We are testing whether desipramine has a lower relapse rate then a placebo. (a) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? (b) From Table 4.14 we see that 20 of the 24 placebo patients relapsed, while 10 of the 24 desipramine patients relapsed. The observed difference in relapses for our sample is $$\begin{aligned}D &=\text { desipramine relapses }-\text { placebo relapses } \\\&=10-20=-10\end{aligned}$$ If we use this difference in number of relapses as our sample statistic, where will the randomization distribution be centered? Why? (c) If the null hypothesis is true (and desipramine has no effect beyond a placebo), we imagine that the 48 patients have the same relapse behavior regardless of which group they are in. We create the randomization distribution by simulating lots of random assignments of patients to the two groups and computing the difference in number of desipramine minus placebo relapses for each assignment. Describe how you could use index cards to create one simulated sample. How many cards do you need? What will you put on them? What will you do with them?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.