/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 122 The same sample statistic is use... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The same sample statistic is used to test a hypothesis, using different sample sizes. In each case, use StatKey or other technology to find the p-value and indicate whether the results are significant at a \(5 \%\) level. Which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis? Testing \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) vs \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}\) using \(\hat{p}_{1}-\hat{p}_{2}=0.8-0.7=0.10\) with each of the following sample sizes: (a) \(\hat{p}_{1}=24 / 30=0.8\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=14 / 20=0.7\) (b) \(\hat{p}_{1}=240 / 300=0.8\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=140 / 200=0.7\)

Short Answer

Expert verified
To find which sample size provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis, we conduct two separate hypothesis tests, one for the smaller sample sizes and one for the larger. After performing the hypothesis tests and calculating the p-values, we interpret the results: The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis. Therefore, the sample size that produced the smallest p-value will provide the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Hypothesis

The null hypothesis \(H_{0}: p_{1}=p_{2}\) suggests that the difference between the two proportions is equal to zero. In contrast, the alternative hypothesis \(H_{a}: p_{1}>p_{2}\) suggests that the proportion 1 is greater than proportion 2. The hypothesis testing is aimed at determining which hypothesis is true.
02

Test (a) \(\hat{p}_{1}=24 / 30=0.8\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=14 / 20=0.7\)

Calculate the standard error (SE) for both proportions using the formula: SE = \(\sqrt{ \hat{p} (1 - \hat{p})(1/n_{1}+1/n_{2})}\), where \(\hat{p}\) is the pooled sample proportion. The pooled sample proportion \(\hat{p}\) can be calculated as \((x_{1}+x_{2})/(n_{1}+n_{2})\), where \(x_{1}\) and \(x_{2}\) are the observed successes and \(n_{1}\) and \(n_{2}\) are the sample sizes. Then calculate the test statistic z using the formula: z = \(((\hat{p}_{1}- \hat{p}_{2}) - 0) / SE\). Lastly, find the p-value associated with this calculated z-score. If p-value < 0.05, reject the null hypothesis.
03

Test (b) \(\hat{p}_{1}=240 / 300=0.8\) and \(\hat{p}_{2}=140 / 200=0.7\)

Perform the same steps as in Step 2 but with different sample sizes.
04

Interpret the Results

Compare the calculated p-values from Step 2 and Step 3. The sample size that provides the smallest p-value should provide the strongest evidence against the null hypothesis.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

P-value
Understanding the p-value is fundamental in hypothesis testing. It's a measure that tells us the probability of obtaining a test statistic at least as extreme as the one we have, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. In simpler terms, it helps us assess how consistent our sample is with the null hypothesis. The lower the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis. If the p-value is less than a predetermined significance level, usually set at 0.05, we have enough grounds to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative.

In our exercise, we calculate the p-value for different sample sizes to see which provides the strongest evidence for the alternative hypothesis, by looking for the p-value that is smallest.
Alternative Hypothesis
The alternative hypothesis \( H_{a} \) is a statement that indicates what we expect to find if the null hypothesis is not true. In other words, it represents a new theory or belief we're testing against the status quo (the null hypothesis). For our given problem, the alternative hypothesis is that proportion 1 (\( p_{1} \) ) is greater than proportion 2 (\( p_{2} \) ). Demonstrating the alternative hypothesis typically involves showing that there's a statistically significant difference between the groups being compared.
Null Hypothesis
On the flip side, the null hypothesis \( H_{0} \) posits that there is no effect or difference we would observe in the population. It's often considered the default or starting point in hypothesis testing. We analyze the data to gather evidence against the null hypothesis. In the context of our problem, the null hypothesis states there's no difference between the two proportions (\( p_{1} \) and \( p_{2} \) ).
Sample Size
Sample size, represented by \( n \) in our formulas, is the number of observations in a sample. It plays a crucial role in hypothesis testing as it impacts the standard error and confidence intervals. Larger sample sizes generally lead to more stable and precise estimates of population parameters, as well as smaller standard errors. In the textbook problem, we see two different sample sizes being used to evaluate their effect on the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis.
Proportion
In statistics, a proportion is a type of ratio that compares a part to a whole. It is expressed as a decimal between 0 and 1. The proportion is key to our exercises, as we're comparing two sample proportions to infer something about the population proportions. Here, we use \( \hat{p}_{1} \) and \( \hat{p}_{2} \) to represent the estimated proportions from two samples, which we're comparing to test our hypotheses.
Standard Error
Standard error (SE) is a measure of the variability or precision of a sample statistic (like the mean or proportion). It's essentially the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the statistic. Calculating the SE is crucial in our example, as it's used to determine the z-score, which we then use to find the p-value. A lower SE indicates that the sample statistic is more reliable. The formula for the SE of the difference between two proportions includes the sample sizes and pooled sample proportion, all of which are present in the problem we're solving.
Test Statistic
The test statistic is a value that is calculated from sample data during a hypothesis test. It's used to decide whether to reject the null hypothesis. It can be a t-score, z-score, chi-square, etc., depending on the test and data. For this particular exercise, we calculate a z-score as our test statistic, providing us with a standardized value to compare against a significance level. The formula involves the sample proportions, their difference, and the standard error.

Specifically, we're assessing whether the observed difference in sample proportions is statistically significantly different from zero (the null hypothesis).
Statistical Significance
Statistical significance is a decision about the non-randomness of the observed data. When we say a result is statistically significant, it means the likelihood of the result occurring by chance is very low, given the null hypothesis is true. The conventional threshold for declaring significance is a p-value less than 0.05. If our test produces a p-value lower than this level, we conclude that the observed data is inconsistent with the null hypothesis with a high degree of confidence.

Hence, in our comparison of sample sizes in the exercise, we're looking to see which sample size leads to statistical significance, providing the strongest evidence that supports the alternative hypothesis.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Testing 50 people in a driving simulator to find the average reaction time to hit the brakes when an object is seen in the view ahead.

Mating Choice and Offspring Fitness Does the ability to choose a mate improve offspring fitness in fruit flies? Researchers have studied this by taking female fruit flies and randomly dividing them into two groups; one group is put into a cage with a large number of males and able to freely choose who to mate with, while flies in the other group are each put into individual vials, each with only one male, giving no choice in who to mate with. Females are then put into egg laying chambers, and a certain number of larvae collected. Do the larvae from the mate choice group exhibit higher survival rates? A study \(^{44}\) published in Nature found that mate choice does increase offspring fitness in fruit flies (with p-value \(<0.02\) ), yet this result went against conventional wisdom in genetics and was quite controversial. Researchers attempted to replicate this result with a series of related experiments, \({ }^{45}\) with data provided in MateChoice. (a) In the first replication experiment, using the same species of fruit fly as the original Nature study, 6067 of the 10000 larvae from the mate choice group survived and 5976 of the 10000 larvae from the no mate choice group survived. Calculate the p-value. (b) Using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) and \(\mathrm{p}\) -value from (a), state the conclusion in context. (c) Actually, the 10,000 larvae in each group came from a series of 50 different runs of the experiment, with 200 larvae in each group for each run. The researchers believe that conditions dif- fer from run to run, and thus it makes sense to treat each \(\mathrm{run}\) as a case (rather than each fly). In this analysis, we are looking at paired data, and the response variable would be the difference in the number of larvae surviving between the choice group and the no choice group, for each of the 50 runs. The counts (Choice and NoChoice and difference (Choice \(-\) NoChoice) in number of surviving larva are stored in MateChoice. Using the single variable of differences, calculate the p-value for testing whether the average difference is greater than \(0 .\) (Hint: this is a single quantitative variable, so the corresponding test would be for a single mean.) (d) Using a significance level of \(\alpha=0.05\) and the p-value from (c), state the conclusion in context. (e) The experiment being tested in parts (a)-(d) was designed to mimic the experiment from the original study, yet the original study yielded significant results while this study did not. If mate choice really does improve offspring fitness in fruit flies, did the follow-up study being analyzed in parts (a)-(d) make a Type I, Type II, or no error? (f) If mate choice really does not improve offspring fitness in fruit flies, did the original Nature study make a Type I, Type II, or no error?

Exercise 4.26 discusses a sample of households in the US. We are interested in determining whether or not there is a linear relationship between household income and number of children. (a) Define the relevant parameter(s) and state the null and alternative hypotheses. (b) Which sample correlation shows more evidence of a relationship, \(r=0.25\) or \(r=0.75 ?\) (c) Which sample correlation shows more evidence of a relationship, \(r=0.50\) or \(r=-0.50 ?\)

A study \(^{54}\) shows that relationship status on Facebook matters to couples. The study included 58 college-age heterosexual couples who had been in a relationship for an average of 19 months. In 45 of the 58 couples, both partners reported being in a relationship on Facebook. In 31 of the 58 couples, both partners showed their dating partner in their Facebook profile picture. Men were somewhat more likely to include their partner in the picture than vice versa. However, the study states: "Females' indication that they are in a relationship was not as important to their male partners compared with how females felt about male partners indicating they are in a relationship." Using a population of college-age heterosexual couples who have been in a relationship for an average of 19 months: (a) A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion with both partners reporting being in a relationshipon Facebook is about 0.66 to 0.88 . What is the conclusion in a hypothesis test to see if the proportion is different from \(0.5 ?\) What significance level is being used? (b) A \(95 \%\) confidence interval for the proportion with both partners showing their dating partner in their Facebook profile picture is about 0.40 to \(0.66 .\) What is the conclusion in a hypothesis test to see if the proportion is different from \(0.5 ?\) What significance level is being used?

Do iPads Help Kindergartners Learn: A Series of Tests Exercise 4.147 introduces a study in which half of the kindergarten classes in a school district are randomly assigned to receive iPads. We learn that the results are significant at the \(5 \%\) level (the mean for the iPad group is significantly higher than for the control group) for the results on the HRSIW subtest. In fact, the HRSIW subtest was one of 10 subtests and the results were not significant for the other 9 tests. Explain, using the problem of multiple tests, why we might want to hesitate before we run out to buy iPads for all kindergartners based on the results of this study.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.