/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 48 Explain why some studies include... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Explain why some studies include both a control group and a placebo treatment. What additional comparisons are possible if both a control group and a placebo group are included?

Short Answer

Expert verified
Including both a control group and a placebo group in studies allows for a robust comparison to be made. Not only can the effect of the treatment be evaluated against a baseline (control group), but also the psychological effect of receiving treatment can be measured (placebo group). This provides a deeper understanding of the actual treatment effect versus the perceived effect of receiving a treatment. It also ensures that any observed effects are not due to unrelated factors.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the concept of a Control Group

In scientific research, a control group refers to a set of subjects or conditions that are kept stable, and not subjected to experimental treatment. This group is often used as a benchmark in order to compare the changes witnessed in the experimental group.
02

Understanding the concept of a Placebo

A placebo is a substance or treatment which is designed to have no therapeutic value. It is often used in clinical trials where one group receives treatment with a placebo while the other group receives the actual treatment. The difference in outcomes is then studied.
03

Purpose of having both a Control Group and a Placebo

Both control groups and placebo treatments are important. The control group helps ensure that any effects seen are actually due to the treatment and not to unrelated factors. A placebo, on the other hand, helps to measure the psychological effect of receiving treatment.
04

Additional Comparisons possible with a Control Group and a Placebo

When both a control group and a placebo group are included, it's possible to differentiate between the psychological effects of receiving a treatment (even if the treatment is inert, as in the placebo group) versus the actual effects of the treatment. This can lead to more accurate results as it provides a more comprehensive comparison across all three groups - the control group, the placebo group, and the treatment group.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Scientific Research Methodology
Scientific research methodology refers to the systematic, theoretical analysis of the methods applied to a field of study. It provides the framework within which the collection of data is produced, analyzed, and interpreted in a rigorous and structured way. A prime feature of this methodology is the use of control groups and placebo treatments in studies.

In essence, a control group is a baseline; it's the norm against which scientists measure the results of the experimental group. The purpose of including a control group is to isolate the effect of the independent variable (the treatment or condition being tested) on the dependent variable (the outcome being measured). By comparing an experimental group to a stable control group, researchers can confirm if changes in the experimental group are attributable to the treatment.

Placebo treatments are also a cornerstone of scientific research methodology, particularly in clinical trials. By mimicking the treatment without containing active ingredients, placebos act to control for the placebo effect—a psychological response where patients improve because they believe they are receiving real treatment. When a study incorporates a placebo group, it's acknowledging and controlling for these psychological factors, helping to ensure that the study's results are due to the treatment's efficacy rather than participants' expectations.
Placebo Effect
The placebo effect is a fascinating phenomenon in which a person's symptoms can improve after receiving a fake treatment simply because they believe it is real. This effect underscores the power of the mind on the body and is a testament to the subjective nature of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials.

When individuals in a placebo group demonstrate improvements, it highlights that expectations, beliefs, and the psychological comfort of receiving care can significantly affect health outcomes. This is why placebos are essential when designing studies—to differentiate between the actual efficacy of a treatment and the effects of an individual's belief in the treatment.

To effectively account for this, researchers ensure that participants are unaware of whether they are receiving the real treatment or a placebo. This blinding helps to eliminate potential biases that could skew the results. By comparing patient responses in the placebo group with those in the treatment group, scientists can better quantify the true impact of the treatment under investigation.
Clinical Trial Design
Clinical trial design encompasses the planning and structuring of studies that evaluate the effectiveness and safety of medical interventions. This design often includes both a control group and a placebo group to ensure the reliability of the trial's results. Each aspect of the trial's framework is carefully considered to ensure the data collected is valid and credible.

Including a control group and a placebo group allows for a comprehensive assessment of the intervention. The control group generally receives no treatment or a standard treatment, offering researchers a reference point to determine the treatment's effect. A placebo group, on the other hand, receives a sham treatment designed to look and feel like the real treatment but without the active components.

This structure facilitates a multifaceted comparison—between the treatment group and the placebo group to examine the real versus psychological effects, and between the treatment group and the control group to measure the treatment against the absence of intervention or standard care. The design also often includes blinding, where neither the participants nor the researchers know who is receiving the actual treatment and who is receiving the placebo, to further reduce the risk of bias and strengthen the validity of the study's findings.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www. decanter.com/news). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they were asked to taste and rate a glass of wine. In one of the rooms, no music was playing and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The researchers concluded that cabernet sauvignon is perceived as being richer and more robust when bold music is played than when no music is heard. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. Can a case be made for the researcher's conclusion that the music played was the cause for the higher rating? Explain.

During the previous calendar year, a county's small claims court processed 870 cases. Describe how a simple random sample of size \(n=50\) might be selected from the case files to obtain information regarding the average award in such cases.

Red wine contains flavonol, an antioxidant thought to have beneficial health effects. But to have an effect, the antioxidant must be absorbed into the blood. The article "Red Wine is a Poor Source of Bioavailable Flavonols in Men" (The journal of Nutrition [2001]: \(745-748\) ) describes a study to investigate three sources of dietary flavonol-red wine, yellow onions, and black tea-to determine the effect of source on absorption. The article included the following statement: We recruited subjects via posters and local newspapers. To ensure that subjects could tolerate the alcohol in the wine, we only allowed men with a consumption of at least seven drinks per week to participate \(\ldots\) Throughout the study, the subjects consumed a diet that was low in flavonols. a. What are the three treatments in this experiment? b. What is the response variable? c. What are three extraneous variables that the researchers chose to control in the experiment?

The authors of the paper "Digital Inequality: Differences in Young Adults' Use of the Internet" (Communication Research [2008]: \(602-621\) ) were interested in determining if people with higher levels of education use the Internet in different ways than those who do not have as much formal education. To answer this question, they used data from a national telephone survey. Approximately 1300 households were selected for the survey, and 270 of them completed the interview. What type of bias should the researchers be concerned about and why?

The Pew Research Center conducted a study of gender bias. The report "Men or Women: Who is the Better Leader? A Paradox in Public Attitudes" (www. pewsocialtrends.org, August 28,2008 ) describes how the study was conducted: In the experiment, two separate random samples of more than 1000 registered voters were asked to read a profile sent to them online of a hypothetical candidate for U.S. Congress in their district. One random sample of 1161 respondents read a profile of Ann Clark, described as a lawyer, a churchgoer, a member of the local Chamber of Commerce, an environmentalist and a member of the same party as the survey respondent. They were then asked what they liked and didn't like about her, whether they considered her qualified and whether they were inclined to vote for her. There was no indication that this was a survey about gender or gender bias. A second random sample of 1139 registered voters was asked to read a profile of Andrew Clark, who- except for his gender-was identical in every way to Ann Clark. These respondents were then asked the same questions. a. What are the two treatments in this experiment? b. What are the response variables in this experiment? c. Explain why "taking two separate random samples" has the same benefits as random assignment to the two treatments in this experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.