/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 15 During the previous calendar yea... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

During the previous calendar year, a county's small claims court processed 870 cases. Describe how a simple random sample of size \(n=50\) might be selected from the case files to obtain information regarding the average award in such cases.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Assign unique numbers to each case and randomly generate 50 numbers between 1 and 870. Select the cases corresponding to the randomly generated numbers to form your sample. From this random sample, you can calculate statistical data like the average award.

Step by step solution

01

Number the cases

First, assign each of the 870 cases a unique number from 1 to 870. This is necessary for maintaining an organized selection of cases for the random sample.
02

Use a random number generator

Next, using an appropriate tool such a random number generator, generate 50 random numbers between 1 and 870. Ensure these numbers are not repeated. Use a computer program or statistical software to do this task.
03

Select the cases

Finally, select the cases based on the generated random numbers and use them to form the sample of size \(n=50\). This forms the random sample from the population of cases. From this sample, statistical analysis such as calculation of the average award can be conducted.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Random Number Generator
A Random Number Generator (RNG) is an essential tool in the process of creating a simple random sample. This tool generates a sequence of numbers that lack any discernible pattern, effectively simulating the randomness akin to drawing lots from a hat.

In our county's small claims court, an RNG would randomly select numbers assigned to case files.
  • Each case must be numbered from 1 to 870.
  • The RNG will select 50 random numbers from this range.
  • The primary goal here is to ensure each case has an equal chance of being chosen.

Using computer programs and statistical software like Excel or Python's random module simplifies this task. By ensuring numbers aren't repeated, the sample maintains its randomness, providing a true reflection of the population.

Random number generators help eliminate biases, which is crucial for the reliability of statistical conclusions drawn from the sample.
Population and Sample
In any statistical study, understanding the population and sample is fundamental. The population refers to the entire group about which we want to draw conclusions. In our scenario with the small claims court, the population comprises all 870 cases from the past year.

On the other hand, a sample is a smaller subset, selected from this larger group.
  • The sample size here is 50 cases.
  • By selecting a sample, researchers can gather insights without examining every single case.

Using a representative sample allows for efficient analysis, saving both time and resources. This method is often used when it’s impractical to study the whole population. The key is to ensure the sample accurately reflects the population to make valid inferences.
Statistical Analysis
Once a simple random sample is obtained, statistical analysis can commence. This process involves examining the data gathered from the sample to understand trends, patterns, or insights about the larger population.

In the context of our small claims court cases, one might want to calculate the average award given. Calculating this average from the sample serves as an estimate of the average in the entire population of cases.
  • Begin by adding all award amounts from the sampled cases.
  • Then, divide this total by the number of cases in the sample, which is 50 in this situation.
  • The result provides an estimate of the average award for all small claims processed.

Statistical analysis goes beyond just the mean, allowing for further exploration of variability, median values, and potential outliers within the sample. This scientific approach ensures decisions and conclusions made are backed by data rather than assumptions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Researchers at the University of Houston decided to test the hypothesis that restaurant servers who squat to the level of their customers would receive a larger tip ("Effect of Server Posture on Restaurant Tipping." Journal of Applied Social Psychology [1993]: \(678-685)\). In the experiment, the waiter would flip a coin to determine whether he would stand or squat next to the table. The waiter would record the amount of the bill and of the tip and whether he stood or squatted. a. Describe the treatments and the response variable. b. Discuss possible extraneous variables and how they could be controlled. c. Discuss whether blocking would be necessary. d. Identify possible confounding variables. e. Discuss the role of random assignment in this experiment.

The Pew Research Center conducted a study of gender bias. The report "Men or Women: Who is the Better Leader? A Paradox in Public Attitudes" (www. pewsocialtrends.org, August 28,2008 ) describes how the study was conducted: In the experiment, two separate random samples of more than 1000 registered voters were asked to read a profile sent to them online of a hypothetical candidate for U.S. Congress in their district. One random sample of 1161 respondents read a profile of Ann Clark, described as a lawyer, a churchgoer, a member of the local Chamber of Commerce, an environmentalist and a member of the same party as the survey respondent. They were then asked what they liked and didn't like about her, whether they considered her qualified and whether they were inclined to vote for her. There was no indication that this was a survey about gender or gender bias. A second random sample of 1139 registered voters was asked to read a profile of Andrew Clark, who- except for his gender-was identical in every way to Ann Clark. These respondents were then asked the same questions. a. What are the two treatments in this experiment? b. What are the response variables in this experiment? c. Explain why "taking two separate random samples" has the same benefits as random assignment to the two treatments in this experiment.

Give an example of an experiment for each of the following: a. Single-blind experiment with the subjects blinded b. Single-blind experiment with the individuals measuring the response blinded c. Double-blind experiment d. An experiment for which it is not possible to blind the subjects

The article "Acupuncture for Bad Backs: Even Sham Therapy Works" (Time, May 12,2009 ) summarized a study conducted by researchers at the Group Health Center for Health Studies in Seattle. In this study, 638 adults with back pain were randomly assigned to one of four groups. People in group 1 received the usual care for back pain. People in group 2 received acupuncture at a set of points tailored specifically for each individual. People in group 3 received acupuncture at a standard set of points typically used in the treatment of back pain. Those in group 4 received fake acupuncture- they were poked with a toothpick at the same set of points used for the people in group \(3 !\) Two notable conclusions from the study were: (1) patients receiving real or fake acupuncture experienced a greater reduction in pain than those receiving usual care; and (2) there was no significant difference in pain reduction for those who received acupuncture (at individualized or the standard set of points) and those who received fake acupuncture toothpick pokes. a. Is this study an observational study or an experiment? Explain. b. Is it reasonable to conclude that receiving either real or fake acupuncture was the cause of the observed reduction in pain in those groups compared to the usual care group? What aspect of this study supports your answer?

Briefly explain why it is advisable to avoid the use of convenience samples.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.