/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 4 Can choosing the right music mak... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Can choosing the right music make wine taste better? This question was investigated by a researcher at a university in Edinburgh (www. decanter.com/news). Each of 250 volunteers was assigned at random to one of five rooms where they were asked to taste and rate a glass of wine. In one of the rooms, no music was playing and a different style of music was playing in each of the other four rooms. The researchers concluded that cabernet sauvignon is perceived as being richer and more robust when bold music is played than when no music is heard. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. Can a case be made for the researcher's conclusion that the music played was the cause for the higher rating? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. The study described is an experiment due to the random assignment of volunteers to different rooms where varying music treatments were applied. b. There are some grounds for attributing the higher wine rating to music, but it's not definitive. The experiment provides evidence of an association but does not conclusively demonstrate a cause-effect relationship, especially if there were lack of control for other confounding variables.

Step by step solution

01

Classify the Study

First, let's identify if the study is an observational study or an experiment. In an observational study, no treatment is applied, and we simply observe characteristics and take measurements. In an experiment, a treatment is deliberately imposed on the individuals in the study to observe their responses. Here, different styles of music (the treatment) was deliberately imposed in the different rooms, and the wine ratings (the responses) were observed. Each volunteer was randomly assigned to any one of the five rooms. Thus, this is an experiment.
02

Determine the Potential Cause-Effect Relationship

Next, let's consider whether a case can be made for the researcher's conclusion that the music played was the cause for the higher rating. A causal conclusion could be drawn from an experiment ONLY when the experiment is a completely randomized, controlled experiment, which isolates the effects of the treatment by controlling all other confounding variables. In this experiment, though it appears that the style of music has been controlled by being varied among rooms, it's not explicitly mentioned whether other confounding variables such as the wine temperature, the size of the wine glass, the room environment, or the taster's emotional and physical state were controlled. Therefore, while the experiment provides evidence of an association, it might not conclusively demonstrate a cause-effect relationship between music and wine rating.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Observational Study
An observational study involves monitoring subjects without manipulating any factors. It's like being a fly on the wall, where you watch and take notes without interfering. This kind of study measures certain variables but does not apply treatments.
In the wine tasting scenario discussed, volunteers could have been observed sipping wine as they normally would, without anyone influencing their environment by playing music.
If this was the case, it would qualify as an observational study. However, in the described experiment, treatments (music styles) were intentionally introduced, making it more controlled than observational.
Controlled Experiment
A controlled experiment gives power to researchers by allowing them to manipulate one or several variables, known as treatments. This involves imposing certain conditions and observing the outcomes.
In this study, music played the role of a treatment. Different styles were deliberately imposed in separate rooms to see how they influenced volunteers' wine perceptions.
By randomly assigning 250 participants to different rooms, the researcher set up conditions to observe the effects of music on wine taste ratings. This control makes the study more than just observational. It is an experiment—a controlled one.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are tricky elements that can impact the study outcome unintentionally. They are sneaky little details that can make results unclear by interfering with the cause-effect relationship.
In the context of this experiment, numerous confounding variables could have played a role. Factors like
  • the temperature of the wine,
  • the size of the glass,
  • the ambiance of the room,
  • or even the mood of the participants
can become potential confounders.
Not controlling these factors can muddy the findings, as each can influence how the wine is perceived, independent of the music. Without clear control of these variables, the results could be questioned.
Random Assignment
Random assignment is a cornerstone technique in experiments that helps in distributing participant characteristics evenly across treatment groups. It minimizes biases that might exist if the groups were self-selected or picked non-randomly.
In our example, random assignment ensured every volunteer had an equal chance of being placed in any one of the five rooms. This method helps to balance out unknown factors among the groups.
Randomly assigning participants to different music conditions helps disentangle the effect of music on wine perception from other personal characteristics or biases.
Thus, it offers a better chance at drawing more reliable conclusions from the experiment.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does living in the South cause high blood pressure? Data from a group of 6278 whites and blacks questioned in the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey between 1988 and 1994 (see CNN.com web site article of January 6,2000 , titled "High Blood Pressure Greater Risk in U.S. South, Study Says") indicates that a greater percentage of Southerners have high blood pressure than do people in any other region of the United States. This difference in rate of high blood pressure was found in every ethnic group, gender, and age category studied. List at least two possible reasons we cannot conclude that living in the South causes high blood pressure.

The article "l'd Like to Buy a Vowel, Drivers Say" (USA Today, August 7, 2001) speculates that young people prefer automobile names that consist of just numbers and/or letters that do not form a word (such as Hyundai's XG300, Mazda's \(626,\) and BMW's \(325 \mathrm{i}\) ). The article goes on to state that Hyundai had planned to identify the car that was eventually marketed as the XG 300 with the name Concerto, until they determined that consumers hated it and that they thought XG300 sounded more "technical" and deserving of a higher price. Do the students at your school feel the same way? Describe how you would go about selecting a sample to answer this question.

During the previous calendar year, a county's small claims court processed 870 cases. Describe how a simple random sample of size \(n=50\) might be selected from the case files to obtain information regarding the average award in such cases.

Red wine contains flavonol, an antioxidant thought to have beneficial health effects. But to have an effect, the antioxidant must be absorbed into the blood. The article "Red Wine is a Poor Source of Bioavailable Flavonols in Men" (The journal of Nutrition [2001]: \(745-748\) ) describes a study to investigate three sources of dietary flavonol-red wine, yellow onions, and black tea-to determine the effect of source on absorption. The article included the following statement: We recruited subjects via posters and local newspapers. To ensure that subjects could tolerate the alcohol in the wine, we only allowed men with a consumption of at least seven drinks per week to participate \(\ldots\) Throughout the study, the subjects consumed a diet that was low in flavonols. a. What are the three treatments in this experiment? b. What is the response variable? c. What are three extraneous variables that the researchers chose to control in the experiment?

The article “Placebos Are Getting More Effective. Drug Makers Are Desperate to Know Why." (Wired Magazine, August 8,2009 ) states that "according to research, the color of a tablet can boost the effectiveness even of genuine meds - or help convince a patient that a placebo is a potent remedy." Describe how you would design an experiment to investigate if adding color to Tylenol tablets would result in greater perceived pain relief. Be sure to address how you would select subjects, how you would measure pain relief, what colors you would use, and whether or not you would include a control group in your experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.