/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 12 Does living in the South cause h... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Does living in the South cause high blood pressure? Data from a group of 6278 whites and blacks questioned in the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey between 1988 and 1994 (see CNN.com web site article of January 6,2000 , titled "High Blood Pressure Greater Risk in U.S. South, Study Says") indicates that a greater percentage of Southerners have high blood pressure than do people in any other region of the United States. This difference in rate of high blood pressure was found in every ethnic group, gender, and age category studied. List at least two possible reasons we cannot conclude that living in the South causes high blood pressure.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Two reasons we cannot conclude that living in the South causes high blood pressure are: 1. Correlation does not imply causation and there may be alternative explanations such as lifestyle or genetic factors affecting this statistic. 2. There could be confounding variables not considered in the study that influence these results.

Step by step solution

01

Understanding the difference between correlative and causative relationships

Correlation does not imply causation. Higher prevalence of high blood pressure in the South may correlate with living there, but it cannot be directly inferred that living in the South causes high blood pressure. There may be other factors at play causing this correlation.
02

Considering alternative explanations

There could be lifestyle or genetic factors common among Southerners that increase the risk of high blood pressure. Additionally, environmental factors such as dietary habits, stress levels, or access to healthcare could be influencing this statistic.
03

Thinking about confounding variables

A confounding variable is an external influence that affects the results of your observation but wasn’t taken into account. Even though the study considered different ethnic groups, genders, and age categories, there could be crucial confounding variables not considered, like socioeconomic status, occupation, or the prevalence of other health conditions.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Correlation vs Causation
Understanding the distinction between correlation and causation is essential in statistics education. When we observe a relationship between two variables, it is tempting to assume one causes the other. However, correlation means that as one variable changes, the other also changes in a predictable way, but it does not establish a cause-and-effect relationship. For example, in the case of high blood pressure in the South, the data show a correlation between living in the South and higher blood pressure rates. However, this does not mean living in the South directly causes high blood pressure. Other factors could be contributing to this observed relationship, making it crucial to differentiate between correlation and causation.
  • Correlation: Indicates a relationship between two variables.
  • Causation: One variable is responsible for the change in another.
  • Importance: Avoids misinterpretation in data analysis.
Confounding Variables
Confounding variables are factors that might influence the outcome of a study without being the primary focus. In research, these variables can obscure or confound the true relationship between the study variables. Confounding variables are particularly tricky because they might not be immediately obvious or included in the initial research design. In the case of high blood pressure in the South, potential confounders could include factors like dietary habits typical in the region or socioeconomic status, which might affect health outcomes.
  • Definition: External factors affecting the study outcome.
  • Examples: Diet, lifestyle, economic factors in health studies.
  • Solution: Identifying and adjusting for these in analysis.
Data Analysis
Data analysis is the process of examining, cleaning, transforming, and modeling data to discover useful information, derive conclusions, and support decision-making. In the context of the study about high blood pressure in the South, effective data analysis would involve scrutinizing the data to rule out bias, identify patterns, and determine the statistical significance of observed trends. It’s crucial to interrogate the methodology, considering factors such as sample size and variability, to ensure valid insights are obtained.
  • Process: Involves data cleaning and transformation.
  • Importance: Helps identify patterns and insights.
  • Application: Validates findings and supports conclusions.
Health Statistics
Health statistics provide essential insights into the health status and trends within populations. They are instrumental in forming policies, guiding public health interventions, and identifying areas needing attention. For instance, high blood pressure rates among Southerners observed in the survey create a basis for exploring specific regional health challenges. Health statistics help in understanding disease prevalence across different demographic factors, thereby aiding in the development of targeted healthcare strategies.
  • Role: Track health trends and inform policies.
  • Application: Addresses public health issues regionally and nationally.
  • Benefit: Identifies healthcare needs based on statistical data.
Research Bias
Research bias occurs when there is a systematic error in a study that leads to incorrect conclusions. Various forms of bias can affect research findings, including selection bias, where the sample is not representative of the population, and measurement bias, where data is inaccurately measured or recorded. In the analysis of high blood pressure in the South, research bias could potentially lead to misinterpretation of the data if not properly addressed. Researchers must strive to minimize bias through careful study design, including diverse and representative samples, and accurate data collection methods.
  • Types: Selection bias, measurement bias.
  • Impact: Misguides study outcomes and conclusions.
  • Prevention: Utilize robust study design and methodology.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Do ethnic group and gender influence the type of care that a heart patient receives? The following passage is from the article "Heart Care Reflects Race and Sex, Not Symptoms" (USA Today, February 25,1999 , reprinted with permission): Previous research suggested blacks and women were less likely than whites and men to get cardiac catheterization or coronary bypass surgery for chest pain or a heart attack. Scientists blamed differences in illness severity, insurance coverage, patient preference, and health care access. The researchers eliminated those differences by videotaping actors - two black men, two black women, two white men, and two white women - describing chest pain from identical scripts. They wore identical gowns, used identical gestures, and were taped from the same position. Researchers asked 720 primary care doctors at meetings of the American College of Physicians or the American Academy of Family Physicians to watch a tape and recommend care. The doctors thought the study focused on clinical decision making. Evaluate this experimental design. Do you think this is a good design or a poor design, and why? If you were designing such a study, what, if anything, would you propose to do differently?

In national surveys, parents consistently point to school safety as an important concern. One source of violence in junior high schools is fighting " Characterization of Seventh-Grade Student Fights," Journal of Adolescent Health [1998]: 103-109). To construct a knowledge base about student fights, a school administrator wants to give two surveys to students after fights are broken up. One of the surveys is to be given to the participants, and the other is to be given to students who witnessed the fight. The type of information desired includes (1) the cause of the fight, (2) whether or not the fight was a continuation of a previous fight, (3) whether drugs or alcohol was a factor, (4) whether or not the fight was gang related, and (5) the role of bystanders. a. Write a set of questions that could be used in the two surveys. Each question should include a set of possible responses. For each question, indicate whether it would be used on both surveys or just on one of the two. b. How might the tendency toward positive selfpresentation affect the responses of the fighter to the survey questions you wrote for \(\operatorname{Part}(\mathrm{a})\) ? c. How might the tendency toward positive selfpresentation affect the responses of a bystander to the survey questions you wrote for \(\operatorname{Part}(a)\) ?

The article “Placebos Are Getting More Effective. Drug Makers Are Desperate to Know Why." (Wired Magazine, August 8,2009 ) states that "according to research, the color of a tablet can boost the effectiveness even of genuine meds - or help convince a patient that a placebo is a potent remedy." Describe how you would design an experiment to investigate if adding color to Tylenol tablets would result in greater perceived pain relief. Be sure to address how you would select subjects, how you would measure pain relief, what colors you would use, and whether or not you would include a control group in your experiment.

An advertisement for a sweatshirt that appeared in Sky Mall Magazine (a catalog distributed by some airlines) stated the following: "This is not your ordinary hoody! Why? Fact: Research shows that written words on containers of water can influence the water's structure for better or worse depending on the nature and intent of the word. Fact: The human body is \(70 \%\) water. What if positive words were printed on the inside of your clothing?" For only \(\$ 79\), you could purchase a hooded sweatshirt that had over 200 positive words (such as hope, gratitude, courage and love) in 15 different languages printed on the inside of the sweatshirt so that you could benefit from being surrounded by these positive words. The reference to the "fact" that written words on containers of water can influence the water's structure appears to be based on the work of Dr. Masaru Emoto who typed words on paper, pasted the words on bottles of water, and observed how the water reacted to the words by seeing what kind of crystals were formed in the water. He describes several of his experiments in his self published book, The Message from Water. If you were going to interview Dr. Emoto, what questions would you want to ask him about his experiment?

Pismo Beach, California, has an annual clam festival that includes a clam chowder contest. Judges rate clam chowders from local restaurants, and the judging is done in such a way that the judges are not aware of which chowder is from which restaurant. One year, much to the dismay of the seafood restaurants on the waterfront, Denny's chowder was declared the winner! (When asked what the ingredients were, the cook at Denny's said he wasn't sure- - he just had to add the right amount of nondairy creamer to the soup stock that he got from Denny's distribution center!) a. Do you think that Denny's chowder would have won the contest if the judging had not been "blind?" Explain. b. Although this was not an experiment, your answer to Part (a) helps to explain why those measuring the response in an experiment are often blinded. Using your answer in Part (a), explain why experiments are often blinded in this way.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.