/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 20 Briefly explain why it is advisa... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Briefly explain why it is advisable to avoid the use of convenience samples.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Convenience sampling should be avoided because it can lead to sampling bias and doesn't represent the whole population. Hence, the results are less likely to be generalized to the whole population.

Step by step solution

01

Understand Convenience Sampling

Convenience sampling is a type of non-probability sampling which involves the sample being drawn from that part of the population which is close to hand, readily available, or convenient. The researcher selects the easiest population members from which he/she can obtain information.
02

Drawbacks of Convenience Sampling

The major disadvantage of convenience sampling is that it can lead to sampling bias. The sample can be biased because it does not represent the whole population effectively, which makes it less likely to reflect the overall population accurately. It can lead to over- or under-representation of particular groups within the sample.
03

Explain Why to Avoid Convenience Sampling

Due to the likelihood of sample bias and the inability to generalize the findings to the broader population, it is advisable to avoid the use of convenience samples. Other forms of sampling method which are more systematic and less biased should be used, for more dependable and applicable results.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Sampling Bias in Research
Understanding sampling bias is fundamental in research methodology. It occurs when certain members of the population are systematically more likely to be selected in the sample than others, leading to results that are not representative of the overall population. This problem can manifest in various forms, such as self-selection bias, where those who choose to participate may have different characteristics than those who do not, or in the form of convenience sampling bias, where the ease of access to participants skews the sample.

In convenience sampling, the non-random nature of the sample selection increases the likelihood of bias since the sample may over-represent certain groups or characteristics. For example, surveying only friends, or customers at one location, does not accommodate the diverse perspectives found across the whole population, possibly leading to skewed data and invalid conclusions.

To reduce sampling bias, researchers can employ strategies such as randomized sampling techniques, ensuring an equal chance of selection for all members, or using stratified sampling, where the population is divided into subgroups (strata) that are then sampled proportionally.
Non-Probability Sampling in Research
Non-probability sampling is a category of sampling methods where the samples are gathered in a process that does not give all individuals in the population equal chances of being selected. Convenience sampling, judgmental sampling, quota sampling, and snowball sampling are all non-probability sampling techniques, each with its own specific approach and usage scenario.

While these methods are often faster and more cost-efficient, they come with the trade-off of increased risk of bias and less reliability in generalizing the findings to the broader population. Due to this limitation, non-probability sampling is frequently used in exploratory research, where the objective is to gain insights or develop hypotheses, rather than to make definitive statements about the population.

To ensure credibility, it is essential for researchers to transparently discuss the limitations of non-probability sampling and the potential for bias in their results as part of their research methodology reporting.
Research Methodology and Sampling Techniques
Research methodology encompasses the systematic planning, carrying out, and documentation of research. It includes various steps such as defining the research question, developing a research design, selecting appropriate sampling techniques, and analyzing data. An integral component of any research methodology is the approach to sampling as it directly impacts the validity and generalizability of the results.

Researchers must choose between probability and non-probability sampling methods based on the nature of the study and the research questions posed. Probability sampling provides a measurable chance for each member of the population to be selected, allowing for more robust statistical analysis and generalizations. In contrast, non-probability sampling is less rigorous statistically but can be appropriate in certain contexts.

Critical to any sampling method is the need for clarity and transparency about the process, the criteria used for sample selection, and the potential limitations of the data collected. By meticulously addressing these elements within their research methodology, researchers provide a solid foundation for the reliability and credibility of their study's conclusions.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Consider the following graphical display that appeared in the New York Times: Based on the data summarized in the graph, we can see that students who have a high school GPA or 3.5 or higher and a combined SAT score of over 1200 have an \(89 \%\) graduation rate when they attend a "most selective" college, but only a \(59 \%\) graduation rate when they attend a "least selective" college. Give an example of a potential confounding variable that might explain why the following statement is not reasonable: If all the students that have a GPA of 3.5 or higher and a combined SAT score of 1200 or higher and that were admitted to a "least selective" college were moved to a "most selective" college, the graduation rate for these students would be approximately \(89 \%\)

The article "Television's Value to Kids: It's All in How They Use It" (Seattle Times, July 6,2005\()\) described a study in which researchers analyzed standardized test results and television viewing habits of 1700 children. They found that children who averaged more than 2 hours of television viewing per day when they were younger than 3 tended to score lower on measures of reading ability and short-term memory. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that watching two or more hours of television is the cause of lower reading scores? Explain.

A study of college students showed a temporary gain of up to 9 IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This conclusion, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you wanted to see whether there is a Mozart effect for students at your school. a. Describe how you might design an experiment for this purpose. b. Does your experimental design include direct control of any extraneous variables? Explain. c. Does your experimental design use blocking? Explain why you did or did not include blocking in your design. d. What role does random assignment play in your design?

During the previous calendar year, a county's small claims court processed 870 cases. Describe how a simple random sample of size \(n=50\) might be selected from the case files to obtain information regarding the average award in such cases.

Researchers at the University of Houston decided to test the hypothesis that restaurant servers who squat to the level of their customers would receive a larger tip ("Effect of Server Posture on Restaurant Tipping." Journal of Applied Social Psychology [1993]: \(678-685)\). In the experiment, the waiter would flip a coin to determine whether he would stand or squat next to the table. The waiter would record the amount of the bill and of the tip and whether he stood or squatted. a. Describe the treatments and the response variable. b. Discuss possible extraneous variables and how they could be controlled. c. Discuss whether blocking would be necessary. d. Identify possible confounding variables. e. Discuss the role of random assignment in this experiment.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.