/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 19 Of the 6500 students enrolled at... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Of the 6500 students enrolled at a community college, 3000 are part time and the other 3500 are full time. The college can provide a list of students that is sorted so that all full-time students are listed first, followed by the part-time students. a. Describe a procedure for selecting a stratified random sample that uses full-time and part-time students as the two strata and that includes 10 students from each stratum. b. Does every student at this community college have the same chance of being selected for inclusion in the sample? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The stratified random sampling procedure involves individually numbering and randomly selecting students within each stratum (full-time and part-time). Every student does not have the same chance of being included in the sample. In this case, part-time students have a slightly higher chance of being picked.

Step by step solution

01

Stratified Random Sampling Procedure

Stratified sampling means dividing the population into homogenous subsets (strata). Here, two strata have been defined — full-time and part-time students. For each stratum, we use a random sampling technique to select 10 students. Since the list is already sorted with all full-time students listed first followed by part-time students, we could:1. Number all the full-time students from 1 to 3500.2. Using a random number generator, select 10 distinct numbers within this range. The students corresponding to those numbers form the sample from the full time stratum.3. Repeat this process for part-time students, now numbering them from 1 to 3000 and selecting 10 numbers within this range.
02

Equal Chance Evaluation

In stratified sampling, every member of the population does not have an equal chance of being chosen for the sample. The probability depends on the size of the stratum compared to the size of the total population. In this scenario, because 10 students are chosen from each stratum, a full-time student (from a pool of 3500) has a 10/3500 (approximately 0.00286) chance of being chosen. Meanwhile, a part-time student (from a pool of 3000) has a 10/3000 (approximately 0.00333) chance of being picked. Therefore, the chances are not equal for full-time and part-time students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Statistical Sampling
Statistical sampling is a foundational method used in statistical research to make inferences about a larger population by examining only a part of it. This is incredibly useful because studying an entire population can often be impractical due to limitations like time, resources, and accessibility. The main goal is to select a sample that is representative of the whole, where each member of the population has a known (though not necessarily equal) chance of being included in the sample.

There are several types of statistical sampling methods, and stratified random sampling is one of them. It enhances the representativeness of the sample by dividing the population into distinct subgroups or 'strata' based on certain characteristics before the sampling process. Such an approach ensures that specific segments of the population are represented in the final sample, therefore, improving the reliability and validity of the results.
Probability in Sampling
Probability plays a central role in the concept of statistical sampling. In probability sampling, every member of the population has a known and non-zero probability of being selected. The exact probability can vary from one individual to the next, depending on the sampling method used. For instance, in simple random sampling, the probability is equal for all members, which is why every sample of a given size has an equal chance of being chosen.

However, when we move to stratified random sampling, elements are first grouped into strata, and then samples are drawn from each strata. Here, the probability of selection within each stratum is equal, but the overall probability can differ due to the relative size of each stratum. This concept is highlighted in our community college example, where full-time and part-time students had different probabilities of being selected because of their differing group sizes.
Homogeneous Subsets
Homogeneous subsets refer to the division of the population into groups or strata that are internally similar or homogeneous in respect to a certain characteristic. Homogeneity within these subsets is crucial for stratified sampling; it ensures that each stratum accurately reflects the diversity of that characteristic within the population.

Importance of Homogeneity

In a well-defined stratum, the variation among the individuals with respect to the characteristic of interest is minimized. This means that virtually any individual chosen from within a stratum could serve as a good representative for that group. For educators, ensuring homogeneity in subsets aids in achieving representativeness and reducing the margin of error in the conclusions drawn from the sample.
Strata Identification
Strata identification is the preliminary step indispensable to stratified random sampling. It involves pinpointing relevant characteristics that define the strata. This process requires meticulous consideration to ensure each stratum is internally homogeneous but different from others. Moreover, every element in the population should be assignable to one and only one stratum to prevent any sampling biases.

In the context of the provided community college exercise, students were stratified into two clear groups: full-time and part-time. This was an appropriate choice because each student's status is exclusively either full-time or part-time, allowing for straightforward and accurate strata identification.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The report "Undergraduate Students and Credit Cards in 2004: An Analysis of Usage Rates and Trends" (Nellie Mae, May 2005 ) estimated that \(21 \%\) of undergraduates with credit cards pay them off each month and that the average outstanding balance on undergraduates' credit cards is \(\$ 2169 .\) These estimates were based on an online survey that was sent to 1260 students. Responses were received from 132 of these students. Is it reasonable to generalize the reported estimates to the population of all undergraduate students? Address at least two possible sources of bias in your answer.

The authors of the paper "Illicit Use of Psychostimulants among College Students" (Psychology. Health \& Medicine [2002]: 283-287) surveyed college students about their use of legal and illegal stimulants. The sample of students surveyed consisted of students enrolled in a psychology class at a small, competitive college in the United States. a. Was this sample a simple random sample, a stratified sample, a systematic sample, or a convenience sample? Explain. b. Give two reasons why the estimate of the proportion of students who reported using illegal stimulants based on data from this survey should not be generalized to all U.S. college students.

The Institute of Psychiatry at Kings College London found that dealing with "infomania" has a temporary, but significant derogatory effect on IQ (Discover, November 2005\()\). In this experiment, researchers divided volunteers into two groups. Each subject took an IQ test. One group had to check e-mail and respond to instant messages while taking the test, and the second group took the test without any distraction. The distracted group had an average score that was 10 points lower than the average for the control group. Explain why it is important that the researchers created the two experimental groups in this study by using random assignment.

The article "Effects of Too Much TV Can Be Undone" (USA Today, October 1, 2007) included the following paragraph: Researchers at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health report that it's not only how many hours children spend in front of the \(\mathrm{TV},\) but at what age they watch that matters. They analyzed data from a national survey in which parents of 2707 children were interviewed first when the children were \(30-33\) months old and again when they were \(5 \frac{1}{2}\), about their TV viewing and their behavior. a. Is the study described an observational study or an experiment? b. The article says that data from a sample of 2707 parents were used in the study. What other information about the sample would you want in order to evaluate the study? c. The actual paper referred to by the USA Today article was "Children's Television Exposure and Behavioral and Social Outcomes at 5.5 years: Does Timing of Exposure Matter?" (Pediatrics [2007]: 762-769). The paper describes the sample as follows: The study sample included 2707 children whose mothers completed telephone interviews at both 30 to 33 months and 5.5 years and reported television exposure at both time points. Of those completing both interviewers, 41 children \((1 \%)\) were excluded because of missing data on television exposure at one or both time points. Compared with those enrolled in the HS clinical trial, parents in the study sample were disproportionately older, white, more educate, and married. The "HS clinical trial" referred to in the excerpt from the paper was a nationally representative sample used in the Healthy Steps for Young Children national evaluation. Based on the above description of the study sample, do you think that it is reasonable to regard the sample as representative of parents of all children at age 5.5 years? Explain. d. The USA Today article also includes the following summary paragraph: The study did not examine what the children watched and can't show TV was the cause of later problems, but it does "tell parents that even if kids are watching TV early in life, and they stop, it could reduce the risk for behavioral and social problems later," Mistry says. What potentially confounding variable is identified in this passage? e. The passage in Part (d) says that the study cannot show that TV was the cause of later problems. Is the quote from Kamila Mistry (one of the study authors) in the passage consistent with the statement about cause? Explain.

Based on a survey conducted on the DietSmart .com web site, investigators concluded that women who regularly watched \(O\) prah were only one-seventh as likely to crave fattening foods as those who watched other daytime talk shows (San Luis Obispo Tribune, October 14,2000\()\). a. Is it reasonable to conclude that watching \(O\) prah causes a decrease in cravings for fattening foods? Explain. b. Is it reasonable to generalize the results of this survey to all women in the United States? To all women who watch daytime talk shows? Explain why or why not.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.