/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 24 The authors of the paper "Illici... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

The authors of the paper "Illicit Use of Psychostimulants among College Students" (Psychology. Health \& Medicine [2002]: 283-287) surveyed college students about their use of legal and illegal stimulants. The sample of students surveyed consisted of students enrolled in a psychology class at a small, competitive college in the United States. a. Was this sample a simple random sample, a stratified sample, a systematic sample, or a convenience sample? Explain. b. Give two reasons why the estimate of the proportion of students who reported using illegal stimulants based on data from this survey should not be generalized to all U.S. college students.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The type of sample used in the survey was a convenience sample. The generalization of the survey results to all U.S. college students could be inaccurate for two reasons. Firstly, the sample is not likely representative of U.S. college students, as it consisted of students from a particular class in a single college. Secondly, the experiences related to legal and illegal stimulant use could vary greatly among university students due to differences in geography, age, academic year, or major.

Step by step solution

01

Recognizing the Type of Sample

This sample is a convenience sample. The students were surveyed because they were conveniently available, taking a specific class at a specific college.
02

Reasons for Uncertain Generalizability - 1

This sample might not be representative of all U.S. college students. The surveyed students were from one psychology class at a small, competitive college. This group might have different qualities or experiences than the broader population of U.S. college students.
03

Reasons for Uncertain Generalizability - 2

The subject of the survey, the use of legal and illegal stimulants, might differ among college students based on various factors such as geography, age, year in college, or field of study. As such, the specific sample in this study may not be reflective of the experiences of all U.S. college students.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Convenience Sample
A convenience sample is a type of non-probability sampling method where participants are selected based on their accessibility and proximity to the researcher. This sampling method is widely used due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. However, it comes with certain drawbacks.
In the context of the exercise given, the students surveyed were part of a psychology class at a small college, which made them easily accessible to the researchers. Therefore, this was a convenience sample, as the researchers chose participants who were immediately available and required minimal effort to include.
  • Advantages: Quick to implement and relatively inexpensive.
  • Disadvantages: May not provide a representative view of the larger population, leading to results that can be biased and not generalizable.
Understanding convenience sampling is crucial in survey design, especially when considering the potential biases and limitations it may introduce to a study's findings.
Generalizability
Generalizability refers to the degree to which the results of a study can be applied to contexts outside the study conditions. For research findings to be valuable on a broader scale, they need to be generalizable to the population from which the study sample was drawn.
In the example of the college students surveyed about stimulant use, the findings may not be generalizable to all U.S. college students due to the limited and specific nature of the sample. Because the surveyed students came from a single class in a small, competitive college, their experiences and behavior might not reflect those of students in other settings or with different characteristics.
Therefore, to maximize generalizability, researchers should aim for a sampling method that captures diverse and representative participants from across the population they intend to study. Strategies include random or stratified sampling, both of which enhance the ability to extend findings beyond the specific study group.
Representativeness
Representativeness in sampling refers to how well the characteristics of the sample align with those of the larger population. A representative sample captures the diversity and unique traits of the population, ensuring that study findings can be confidently applied to broader contexts.
For the surveyed group of psychology students, representativeness is lacking due to their specific enrollment at a single, competitive college. Such a homogeneous group might not reflect different demographics or experiences prevalent across the entire U.S. college student population.
To improve representativeness, researchers should consider factors such as class size, college type, or geographic location when selecting their sample. This breadth of representation allows researchers to make more valid inferences from their survey data, leading to insights that genuinely apply to the whole population.
Survey Design
Survey design is the blueprint for collecting data in a study, outlining how researchers will gather and analyze information to answer their research question. Good survey design ensures that the right data is collected in an efficient and objective manner, contributing to the validity and reliability of the research.
In the context of the discussed exercise, choices in survey design, such as using a convenience sample, have significant consequences for the study's outcomes. Thoughtful survey design requires:
  • Clear objectives: Defining what the survey seeks to uncover guides the choice of questions and sampling methods.
  • Proper sampling methods: Choosing the right method (e.g., random sampling) can improve the reliability of the results.
  • Question design: Questions should be unbiased and structured to elicit clear and honest responses.
By carefully planning a survey's design, researchers can enhance both the quality of data collection and the applicability of their findings, making them relevant and useful beyond the scope of the original study.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Does living in the South cause high blood pressure? Data from a group of 6278 whites and blacks questioned in the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey between 1988 and 1994 (see CNN.com web site article of January 6,2000 , titled "High Blood Pressure Greater Risk in U.S. South, Study Says") indicates that a greater percentage of Southerners have high blood pressure than do people in any other region of the United States. This difference in rate of high blood pressure was found in every ethnic group, gender, and age category studied. List at least two possible reasons we cannot conclude that living in the South causes high blood pressure.

The article "A Debate in the Dentist's Chair" (San Luis Obispo Tribune, January 28,2000 ) described an ongoing debate over whether newer resin fillings are a better alternative to the more traditional silver amalgam fillings. Because amalgam fillings contain mercury, there is concern that they could be mildly toxic and prove to be a health risk to those with some types of immune and kidney disorders. One experiment described in the article used sheep as subjects and reported that sheep treated with amalgam fillings had impaired kidney function. a. In the experiment, a control group of sheep that received no fillings was used but there was no placebo group. Explain why it is not necessary to have a placebo group in this experiment. b. The experiment compared only an amalgam filling treatment group to a control group. What would be the benefit of also including a resin filling treatment group in the experiment? c. Why do you think the experimenters used sheep rather than human subjects?

A study of more than 50,000 U.S. nurses found that those who drank just one soda or fruit punch a day tended to gain much more weight and had an \(80 \%\) increased risk in developing diabetes compared to those who drank less than one a month. (The Washington Post, August 25,2004 ). "The message is clear.... Anyone who cares about their health or the health of their family would not consume these beverages," said Walter Willett of the Harvard School of Public Health, who helped conduct the study. The sugar and beverage industries said that the study was fundamentally flawed. "These allegations are inflammatory. Women who drink a lot of soda may simply have generally unhealthy lifestyles," said Richard Adamson of the American Beverage Association. a. Do you think that the study described was an observational study or an experiment? b. Is it reasonable to conclude that drinking soda or fruit punch causes the observed increased risk of diabetes? Why or why not?

A petition with 500 signatures is submitted to a university's student council. The council president would like to determine the proportion of those who signed the petition who are actually registered students at the university. There is not enough time to check all 500 names with the registrar, so the council president decides to select a simple random sample of 30 signatures. Describe how this might be done.

Is status related to a student's understanding of science? The article "From Here to Equity: The Influence of Status on Student Access to and Understanding of Science" (Culture and Comparative Studies [1999]: \(577-602\) ) described a study on the effect of group discussions on learning biology concepts. An analysis of the relationship between status and "rate of talk" (the number of on-task speech acts per minute) during group work included gender as a blocking variable. Do you think that gender is a useful blocking variable? Explain.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.