/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 69 An article titled "I Said, Not W... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

An article titled "I Said, Not While You Study: Science Suggests Kids Can't Study and Groove at the Same Time" appeared in the Washington Post (September 5,2006 ). This provides an example of a reporter summarizing the result of a scientific study in a way that is designed to make it accessible to the newspaper's readers. You can find the newspaper article online by searching on the title or by going to http://www.washingtonpost.com/ wp- dyn/content/article/2006/09/03/AR2006090300592 .html. The study referenced in the newspaper article was published in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Science and can be found at http://www.pnas.org/ content/103/31/11778.full. Read the newspaper article and then take a look at the published paper. Comment on whether you think that the author was successful in communicating the findings of the study to the intended audience.

Short Answer

Expert verified
The short answer to this exercise will vary, as it is subjective and requires personal judgment. Therefore, there cannot be a definitive answer for everyone.

Step by step solution

01

Read the Newspaper Article

First of all, navigate to the provided URL or search for the title online to locate the newspaper article. Read the article carefully and try to understand the narrative, the key points discussed, and the study's results according to the newspaper article.
02

Understand the Real Study

Then, access the full scientific paper using provided weblink or search it by title. Read it thoroughly. Focus on the summary, abstract, conclusions, and discussions. Make key notes and highlight important findings.
03

Compare and Analyze Both Sources

After understanding the content of both sources, compare them. Assess how comprehensively and accurately the newspaper article has summarized and presented the original study. Consider the complexity of the scientific information, the level of simplification needed for a general audience, and the retention of core findings.
04

Formulate Opinion

Formulate an opinion about how successfully the reporter communicates the study's findings to the general public. Reflect on whether significant aspects were omitted or misrepresented in the newspaper report, and whether the author made the information accessible and engaging for its readers.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Science Journalism
Science journalism plays a crucial role in translating complex scientific studies into digestible information for the general public. In the digital age, where scientific misinformation can spread rapidly, science journalists act as intermediaries, meticulously interpreting research findings and presenting them in an engaging manner.

For instance, when a study concluding that multitasking with music impacts study effectiveness is reported by the media, the journalist's task is not only to paraphrase scientific data but also to provide context that resonates with the reader’s daily experiences. Effective science journalism goes beyond mere simplification; it requires ensuring accuracy while making the science relatable to its audience. Essential elements include an appealing narrative, clear visuals, and real-world implications that help readers understand the significance of the research in their own lives.
Data Interpretation in Media
Data interpretation in media is a critical process that shapes public understanding of scientific findings. The media's portrayal of data greatly influences how people perceive and act upon scientific information. This process involves selecting the most relevant data from studies and presenting it in a manner that supports coherent storytelling.

Challenges of Data Interpretation

Simplifying complex data for a broad audience often leads to challenges, such as oversimplifying the results or focusing on sensational aspects to grab attention. It's essential that media outlets provide balanced reporting that captures the nuances of scientific research while still being understandable. When interpreting data, media should aim to preserve the study's integrity, avoid cherry-picking, and prevent any potential misinterpretation that could lead to public misconceptions.
Scientific Literacy
Scientific literacy is the foundation upon which individuals can understand and engage with science journalism and data interpretation. It encompasses the ability to comprehend basic scientific concepts, interpret research findings, and critically assess the validity of scientific information presented in the media.

To foster scientific literacy, educational systems and media platforms must provide resources that educate the public on scientific methods and terminologies. This empowers readers to discern between well-substantiated science news and sensationalized or misleading reports. Promoting scientific literacy also includes teaching individuals to identify credible sources and encouraging a healthy skepticism towards information that may not be backed by rigorous scientific evidence.
Research Analysis
Research analysis involves the systematic examination and interpretation of scientific studies to derive meaningful insights. In the context of science journalism, this means dissecting a research paper to understand its methodology, data collection, results, and conclusions.

Successful analysis requires a deep understanding of scientific principles and the ability to evaluate the study's reliability. Analysts must consider potential biases, the sample size, the variables measured, and the statistical significance of the results. With thorough research analysis, science journalists can ensure the fidelity of scientific information from academic papers to the news stories and features we read, thereby providing the public with factually correct and comprehensively vetted information.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

The authors of the paper "Illicit Use of Psychostimulants among College Students" (Psychology. Health \& Medicine [2002]: 283-287) surveyed college students about their use of legal and illegal stimulants. The sample of students surveyed consisted of students enrolled in a psychology class at a small, competitive college in the United States. a. Was this sample a simple random sample, a stratified sample, a systematic sample, or a convenience sample? Explain. b. Give two reasons why the estimate of the proportion of students who reported using illegal stimulants based on data from this survey should not be generalized to all U.S. college students.

The authors of the paper "Popular Video Games: Quantifying the Presentation of Violence and its Context" (Journal of Broadcasting \& Electronic Media [2003]: 58-76) investigated the relationship between video game rating - suitable for everyone (E), suitable for 13 years of age and older \((\mathrm{T})\), and suitable for 17 years of age and older \((\mathrm{M})-\) and the number of violent interactions per minute of play. The sample of games examined consisted of 60 video games- the 20 most popular (by sales) for each of three game systems. The researchers concluded that video games rated for older children had significantly more violent interactions per minute than did those games rated for more general audiences. a. Do you think that the sample of 60 games was selected in a way that makes it reasonable to think it is representative of the population of all video games? b. Is it reasonable to generalize the researchers' conclusion to all video games? Explain why or why not.

The report "Comparative Study of Two Computer Mouse Designs" (Cornell Human Factors Laboratory Technical Report RP7992) included the following description of the subjects used in an experiment: Twenty-four Cornell University students and staff ( 12 males and 12 females) volunteered to participate in the study. Three groups of 4 men and 4 women were selected by their stature to represent the 5 th percentile (female \(152.1 \pm 0.3 \mathrm{~cm},\) male \(164.1 \pm 0.4 \mathrm{~cm}), 50\) th percentile (female \(162.4 \pm 0.1 \mathrm{~cm},\) male \(174.1 \pm 0.7 \mathrm{~cm}),\) and 95 th percentile (female \(171.9 \pm 0.2 \mathrm{~cm},\) male \(185.7 \pm 0.6 \mathrm{~cm}\) ranges \(\ldots\) All subjects reported using their right hand to operate a computer mouse. This experimental design incorporated direct control and blocking. a. Are the potential effects of the extraneous variable stature (height) addressed by blocking or direct control? b. Whether the right or left hand is used to operate the mouse was considered to be an extraneous variable. Are the potential effects of this variable addressed by blocking or direct control?

A study of college students showed a temporary gain of up to 9 IQ points after listening to a Mozart piano sonata. This conclusion, dubbed the Mozart effect, has since been criticized by a number of researchers who have been unable to confirm the result in similar studies. Suppose that you wanted to see whether there is a Mozart effect for students at your school. a. Describe how you might design an experiment for this purpose. b. Does your experimental design include direct control of any extraneous variables? Explain. c. Does your experimental design use blocking? Explain why you did or did not include blocking in your design. d. What role does random assignment play in your design?

Whether or not to continue a Mardi Gras Parade through downtown San Luis Obispo, CA, is a hotly debated topic. The parade is popular with students and many residents, but some celebrations have led to complaints and a call to eliminate the parade. The local newspaper conducted online and telephone surveys of its readers and was surprised by the results. The survey web site received more than 400 responses, with more than \(60 \%\) favoring continuing the parade, while the telephone response line received more than 120 calls, with more than \(90 \%\) favoring banning the parade (San Luis Obispo Tribune, March 3, 2004). What factors may have contributed to these very different results?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.