/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 53 State an event that has happened... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

State an event that has happened to you or to someone you know that seems highly coincidental (such as seeing a friend while on vacation). Explain why that event may not be especially surprising, once you think of all the similar types of events that could have happened to you or someone that you know, over the course of several years.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Coincidental events may feel unlikely, but many such events over time make them statistically probable.

Step by step solution

01

Identify the Coincidental Event

A highly coincidental event I experienced was running into an old school friend while vacationing in Paris. We had not been in contact for years and were both from different countries, so seeing each other unexpectedly in a foreign place seemed improbable.
02

Consider Similar Events

Recognize that similar unexpected meetings could occur in various settings, such as bumping into acquaintances at airports, concerts, or other tourist locations. Each of these is a distinct opportunity for a similar coincidental encounter.
03

Evaluate Event Probability Over Time

Consider the number of possible opportunities for such events to occur over the years. With multiple trips, vacations, and social events involving many people, the probability of encountering someone you know increases over time.
04

Analyze Cumulative Probability

The cumulative probability of such coincidences should be considered. Each individual instance may seem unlikely, but when you account for all possible events over a lifetime, the chance of at least one occurring is much higher.
05

Conclusion on the Nature of Coincidence

Given the frequency of interactions and travels over a lifetime, and the large number of people one knows, it's statistically plausible that at least one highly coincidental meeting would occur. The vast array of possible similar events makes any single event not especially surprising in hindsight.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Coincidences
Coincidences seem magical at first glance. They catch us by surprise because they defy our everyday expectations. Imagine vacationing somewhere far away, and suddenly you see a school friend you haven't spoken to in years. It feels like such a small world! However, the sense of wonder often comes from our failure to consider the broader context.
For example, the chance of meeting that friend isn't just based on the single event itself. Instead, it's about the multitude of potential meetings that could happen in various scenarios:
  • Running into acquaintances at malls or airports.
  • Seeing familiar faces at large public events, like concerts or festivals.
  • Passing by an old colleague in a different city.
The larger number of interactions you have over time, the more likely a coincidence becomes! Everyday life is full of opportunities for unexpected encounters. Each place you visit and each person you know adds to a broader network where coincidences can occur. So, the next time something coincidental happens, remember it might not be as unlikely as you think once all possibilities are considered!
Cumulative Probability
Cumulative probability helps explain why what seems like a coincidence is statistically plausible. It's the likelihood of an event happening at least once over a given number of tries. Let's look at encountering an old friend while on vacation. This might feel improbable if you think of it as a one-time event.
However, consider the cumulative probability over your lifetime. Each trip, each new location adds a chance of bumping into someone you know. Say you take 10 trips in your life, each with a tiny probability of encountering an acquaintance. When you add them up, the chance that at least one memorable meeting occurs increases significantly.
The math behind this is straightforward. If an event has a probability \( p \) of happening in a single trial, the probability that it doesn't happen in one trial is \( 1-p \). Over \( n \) independent trials, the probability that it never happens at all is \( (1-p)^n \). Therefore, the cumulative probability that it happens at least once is:\[1 - (1-p)^n\]As this formula shows, with more trials, even events with small individual probabilities become likely over the long run. This is why what appears as coincidence can be seen as an expected occurrence when examining it through the lens of cumulative probability.
Event Occurrence Analysis
When analyzing the occurrence of events, it's crucial to look at the big picture. We often focus merely on the surprising moment without acknowledging the many times similar events didn't happen. Let's break this down further.
To analyze event occurrence, we look at it from several angles:
  • **Frequency of Opportunities:** Consider the number of times you are in situations where meeting someone you know could happen.
  • **Network Size:** Larger social networks increase the chance of meeting someone familiar during any random outing.
  • **Event Variety:** The diverse types of events, from a party in your hometown to a festival abroad, add to the mix of possibilities.
With these factors in mind, any particular coincidental event is just one piece of a much larger puzzle. As you analyze occurrences over extended periods, these 'rare' events don't just lose their improbability—they become almost expected eventually.
Simplifying this concept is essential for truly understanding coincidences. Knowing that our lives are filled with innumerable interactions and events helps make sense of seemingly unexpected phenomena. Thus, a statistical approach demystifies these occurrences, showing they're more common than first impressions might suggest!

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Down syndrome again Example 8 discussed the Triple Blood Test for Down syndrome, using data summarized in a table shown again below. \begin{tabular}{lrrr} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Blood Test } & \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Down & POS & NEG & Total \\ \hline D & 48 & 6 & 54 \\ D \(^{\text {c }}\) & 1307 & 3921 & 5228 \\ Total & 1355 & 3927 & 5282 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Given that a test result is negative, show that the probability the fetus actually has Down syndrome is \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{D} \mid \mathrm{NEG})=0.0015\) b. Is \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{D} \mid \mathrm{NEG})\) equal to \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{NEG} \mid \mathrm{D}) ?\) If so, explain why. If not, find \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{NEG} \mid \mathrm{D})\).

Labor force In \(2014,\) a sample of 1925 Americans revealed that about \(20.5 \%\) of them belong to the government sector. \(7.5 \%\) of these are part-time employees, \(60 \%\) are full-time employees, and \(32.5 \%\) are retired. a. Define events and identify which of these four probabilities refer to conditional probabilities. b. Find the probability that an American adult in this sample is a full-time government employee.

A particular heart disease is said to have a prevalence of \(1 / 1000\) in a specific population. In a sample of 50 people chosen randomly, what is the probability that at least two people have this disease?

Before the first human heart transplant, Dr. Christiaan Barnard of South Africa was asked to assess the probability that the operation would be successful. Did he need to rely on the relative frequency definition or the subjective definition of probability? Explain.

The powerrank.com website (http:// thepowerrank.com/2014/06/06/world- cup-2014-winprobabilities-from-the-power-rank/) listed the probability of each team to win the 2014 World Cup in soccer as follows: 1\. Brazil, \(35.9 \%\). 2\. Argentina, \(10.0 \%\). 3\. Spain, \(8.9 \%\). 4\. Germany, \(7.4 \%\). 5\. Netherlands, \(5.7 \%\). 6\. Portugal, \(3.9 \%\). 7\. France, \(3.4 \%\). 8\. England, \(2.8 \%\). 9\. Uruguay, \(2.5 \%\). 10\. Mexico, \(2.5 \%\). 11\. Italy, \(2.3 \%\). 12\. Ivory Coast, \(2.0 \%\), 13\. Colombia, \(1.5 \%\). 14\. Russia, \(1.5 \%\). 15\. United States, \(1.1 \%\). 16\. Chile, \(1.0 \%\). 17\. Croatia, \(0.9 \%\) 18\. Ecuador, \(0.8 \%\). 19\. Nigeria, \(0.8 \%\). 20\. Switzerland, \(0.7 \%\). 21\. Greece, \(0.6 \%\) 22\. \(\operatorname{Iran}, 0.6 \%\). 23\. Japan, \(0.6 \%\). 24\. Ghana, \(0.6 \%\). 25\. Belgium, \(0.4 \%\). 26\. Honduras, \(0.3 \%\). 27\. South Korea, \(0.3 \%\). 28\. Bosnia-Herzegovina, \(0.3 \%\). 29\. Costa Rica, \(0.3 \%\). 30\. Cameroon, \(0.2 \%\). 31\. Australia, \(0.2 \%\). 32\. Algeria, \(0.1 \%\). a. Interpret Brazil's probability of \(35.9 \%,\) which was based on computer simulations of the tournament. Is it a relative frequency or a subjective interpretation of probability? b. Germany would emerge as the actual winner of the 2014 World Cup. Does this indicate that the \(7.4 \%\) chance of Germany winning, which was calculated before the tournament, should have been \(100 \%\) instead?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.