/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 8 Before the first human heart tra... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Before the first human heart transplant, Dr. Christiaan Barnard of South Africa was asked to assess the probability that the operation would be successful. Did he need to rely on the relative frequency definition or the subjective definition of probability? Explain.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Dr. Barnard used subjective probability.

Step by step solution

01

Identify Definitions of Probability

There are two key definitions of probability: relative frequency and subjective. Relative frequency probability is based on the frequency of events occurring over a large number of trials. Subjective probability is based on intuition, experience, or personal judgment when there is no sufficient data.
02

Analyze the Heart Transplant Context

A heart transplant is a complex, rare medical procedure, especially before the first operation occurred. There were no prior events or trials to base a relative frequency probability.
03

Determine the Applicable Probability Definition

Since the heart transplant had never been performed on humans before, Dr. Barnard could not rely on past data or experimentation. He had to make a judgment based on existing medical knowledge and expertise.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Relative Frequency
Relative frequency is a way of determining the likelihood of an event happening based on past occurrences. Imagine you're flipping a coin multiple times. Each flip gives you a result, either heads or tails. Over a large number of flips, you might notice a pattern: heads appear about 50% of the time, and tails also 50%. This is relative frequency. It's practical when we have a lot of data to look at, and it can give us a reasonable prediction based on history.
However, if you're dealing with something new or rare, like early heart transplants, you may not have past events to inform your probability. In such cases, relying on relative frequency is not feasible because you simply don't have a track record to refer to.
Subjective Probability
Subjective probability is based on personal intuition, expert judgment, or educated guesses in situations where data is unavailable or limited. This type of probability is common in unique or unprecedented situations, like the first human heart transplant performed by Dr. Christiaan Barnard.
Unlike relative frequency, which relies on hard data, subjective probability depends on the knowledge and experience of the person making the judgment.
  • It allows experts to assess risk, even when faced with new challenges.
  • Though it's less quantifiable, it's an important complement to statistical analysis when data is missing.
In Dr. Barnard's case, he couldn’t rely on past heart transplant operations since none had been performed before. Instead, he had to use subjective probability, drawing on his extensive medical training and understanding of the human body.
Medical Expertise
Medical expertise involves the specialized knowledge and skills that healthcare professionals develop through education and experience. When tackling novel medical procedures, like the first heart transplant, experts often rely heavily on their medical background.
Medical expertise helps doctors make informed decisions about patient care, even when confronted with situations that lack precedent. In the absence of prior data, it's crucial for predicting outcomes using subjective probability.
  • It guides doctors to ask the right questions and assess situations critically.
  • It provides a foundation for making educated guesses based on anatomical and physiological understanding.
Dr. Barnard's extensive background in medicine would have been his greatest asset in assessing the probability of success for the heart transplant, underscoring the indispensable role of medical expertise in pioneering medical advancements.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Part of a student opinion poll at a university asks students what they think of the quality of the existing student union building on the campus. The possible responses were great, good, fair, and poor. Another part of the poll asked students how they feel about a proposed fee increase to help fund the cost of building a new student union. The possible responses to this question were in favor, opposed, and no opinion. a. List all potential outcomes in the sample space for someone who is responding to both questions. b. Show how a tree diagram can be used to display the outcomes listed in part a.

Religious affiliation The 2012 Statistical Abstract of the United States \(^{3}\) provides information on individuals' self-described religious affiliations. The information for 2008 is summarized in the following table (all numbers are in thousands). \begin{tabular}{lr} \hline Christian & \\ Catholic & 57,199 \\ Baptist & 36,148 \\ Christian (no denomination specified) & 16,834 \\ Methodist/Wesleyan & 11,366 \\ Other Christian & 51,855 \\ Jewish & 2,680 \\ Muslim & 1,349 \\ Buddhist & 1,189 \\ Other non-Christian & 3,578 \\ No Religion & 34,169 \\ Refused to Answer & 11,815 \\ Total Adult Population in 2008 & 228,182 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Find the probability that a randomly selected individual is identified as Christian. b. Given that an individual identifies as Christian, find the probability that the person is Catholic. c. Given that an individual answered, find the probability the individual is identified as following no religion.

The powerrank.com website (http:// thepowerrank.com/2014/06/06/world- cup-2014-winprobabilities-from-the-power-rank/) listed the probability of each team to win the 2014 World Cup in soccer as follows: 1\. Brazil, \(35.9 \%\). 2\. Argentina, \(10.0 \%\). 3\. Spain, \(8.9 \%\). 4\. Germany, \(7.4 \%\). 5\. Netherlands, \(5.7 \%\). 6\. Portugal, \(3.9 \%\). 7\. France, \(3.4 \%\). 8\. England, \(2.8 \%\). 9\. Uruguay, \(2.5 \%\). 10\. Mexico, \(2.5 \%\). 11\. Italy, \(2.3 \%\). 12\. Ivory Coast, \(2.0 \%\), 13\. Colombia, \(1.5 \%\). 14\. Russia, \(1.5 \%\). 15\. United States, \(1.1 \%\). 16\. Chile, \(1.0 \%\). 17\. Croatia, \(0.9 \%\) 18\. Ecuador, \(0.8 \%\). 19\. Nigeria, \(0.8 \%\). 20\. Switzerland, \(0.7 \%\). 21\. Greece, \(0.6 \%\) 22\. \(\operatorname{Iran}, 0.6 \%\). 23\. Japan, \(0.6 \%\). 24\. Ghana, \(0.6 \%\). 25\. Belgium, \(0.4 \%\). 26\. Honduras, \(0.3 \%\). 27\. South Korea, \(0.3 \%\). 28\. Bosnia-Herzegovina, \(0.3 \%\). 29\. Costa Rica, \(0.3 \%\). 30\. Cameroon, \(0.2 \%\). 31\. Australia, \(0.2 \%\). 32\. Algeria, \(0.1 \%\). a. Interpret Brazil's probability of \(35.9 \%,\) which was based on computer simulations of the tournament. Is it a relative frequency or a subjective interpretation of probability? b. Germany would emerge as the actual winner of the 2014 World Cup. Does this indicate that the \(7.4 \%\) chance of Germany winning, which was calculated before the tournament, should have been \(100 \%\) instead?

A teacher announces a pop quiz for which the student is completely unprepared. The quiz consists of 100 true-false questions. The student has no choice but to guess the answer randomly for all 100 questions. a. Simulate taking this quiz by random guessing. Number a sheet of paper 1 to 100 to represent the 100 questions. Write a T (true) or F (false) for each question, by predicting what you think would happen if you repeatedly flipped a coin and let a tail represent a T guess and a head represent an F guess. (Don't actually flip a coin; merely write down what you think a random series of guesses would look like.) b. How many questions would you expect to answer correctly simply by guessing? c. The table shows the 100 correct answers. The answers should be read across rows. How many questions did you answer correctly? d. The preceding answers were actually randomly generated by an app. What percentage were true, and what percentage would you expect? Why are they not necessarily identical? e. Are there groups of answers within the sequence of 100 answers that appear nonrandom? For instance, what is the longest run of Ts or Fs? By comparison, which is the longest run of Ts or Fs within your sequence of 100 answers? (There is a tendency in guessing what randomness looks like to identify too few long runs in which the same outcome occurs several times in a row.)

Down syndrome again Example 8 discussed the Triple Blood Test for Down syndrome, using data summarized in a table shown again below. \begin{tabular}{lrrr} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Blood Test } & \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Down & POS & NEG & Total \\ \hline D & 48 & 6 & 54 \\ D \(^{\text {c }}\) & 1307 & 3921 & 5228 \\ Total & 1355 & 3927 & 5282 \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Given that a test result is negative, show that the probability the fetus actually has Down syndrome is \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{D} \mid \mathrm{NEG})=0.0015\) b. Is \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{D} \mid \mathrm{NEG})\) equal to \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{NEG} \mid \mathrm{D}) ?\) If so, explain why. If not, find \(\mathrm{P}(\mathrm{NEG} \mid \mathrm{D})\).

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.