/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 34 Go Celtics! Larry Bird, who play... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Go Celtics! Larry Bird, who played pro basketball for the Boston Celtics, was known for being a good shooter. In games during \(1980-1982,\) when he missed his first free throw, 48 out of 53 times he made the second one, and when he made his first free throw, 251 out of 285 times he made the second one. a. Form a contingency table that cross tabulates the outcome of the first free throw (made or missed) in the rows and the outcome of the second free throw (made or missed) in the columns. b. For a given pair of free throws, estimate the probability that Bird (i) made the first free throw and (ii) made the second free throw. (Hint: Use counts in the (i) row margin and (ii) column margin.) c. Estimate the probability that Bird made the second free throw, given that he made the first one. Does it seem as if his success on the second shot depends strongly, or hardly at all, on whether he made the first?

Short Answer

Expert verified
The contingency table is structured, and probabilities show Bird has an 88.1% chance of making the second if he makes the first. His second throw success weakly depends on the first.

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Data

To solve the problem, we'll structure our information into a contingency table based on the outcomes of both the first and second free throws.
02

Create the Contingency Table

We are given that when Larry Bird missed his first free throw, he made the second one 48 times out of 53. Therefore, he missed the second one 5 times. Also, when he made his first free throw, he made the second one 251 times out of 285, missing it 34 times. We can create our contingency table as follows: \[\begin{array}{c|c|c} & \text{Made Second} & \text{Missed Second} \hline\text{Made First} & 251 & 34 \\text{Missed First} & 48 & 5 \\end{array}\]
03

Calculate Marginal Totals

Sum each row and column to create margins. For the first throws: 285 were made and 53 were missed. For the second throws: 299 were made and 39 were missed.Thus, we have: \[\begin{array}{c|c|c|c} & \text{Made Second} & \text{Missed Second} & \text{Total} \hline\text{Made First} & 251 & 34 & 285 \\text{Missed First} & 48 & 5 & 53 \hline\text{Total} & 299 & 39 & 338\end{array}\]
04

Calculate Probability of Making First and Second Free Throws

Calculate the probability that Bird made both the first and the second free throw: Since he made his first free throw 285 times, and out of those, he made the second 251 times, the probability is \( \frac{251}{338} \approx 0.742 \) or 74.2%.
05

Calculate Conditional Probability

Calculate the probability that Bird made the second free throw given he made the first: Divide the number of times he made the second throw after making the first (251) by the number of times he made the first throw (285). This gives \( \frac{251}{285} \approx 0.881 \) or 88.1%. There seems to be some dependency, although it appears he consistently performed well regardless of the outcome of the first throw.

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Calculation
Probability is the mathematical concept that measures the likelihood of an event happening. In this context, we calculate the probability by looking at how often an event happens out of the total number of events.
For example, to find the probability that Larry Bird made both the first and second free throws, we'll use the relevant data from the contingency table. We know he made his first throw 285 times and out of those, he made his second throw 251 times. So, the probability that he made both is calculated as the ratio of the successful consecutive attempts to the total attempts:

  • Probability of making both: \( \frac{251}{338} \approx 0.742 \) or 74.2%
Understanding this probability helps in assessing Bird's consistent performance over the specified period.
Conditional Probability
Conditional probability asks how likely something is to happen given some other condition is already satisfied. In basketball terms, we want to know how likely Larry Bird is to make his second free throw if he's already made the first one. This is different from just looking at the chances of making any single throw as it considers the outcome of the first throw.

The calculation comes from only looking at the scenarios where Bird made his first throw and considering how many of these times he also made his second throw. We get this by using the formula:
  • Probability he makes the second if he made the first: \( \frac{251}{285} \approx 0.881 \) or 88.1%
This result shows a dependency where making the first throw does seem to help with making the second, though Bird's overall high performance suggests he typically throws consistently well.
Marginal Totals
Marginal totals in a contingency table give you the overall numbers for each category of an event regardless of the outcome of another related event. Think of them like summaries that help you see the big picture of what's happening.

In the case of Larry Bird's free throws, we calculated:
  • Total made first throws: 285
  • Total missed first throws: 53
  • Total made second throws: 299
  • Total missed second throws: 39
  • Overall total: 338 free throw pairs
These totals help provide context for understanding the conditional probabilities and the probabilities of each combination of throws. They form the basis for understanding the distribution of Bird's successes and misses, and thus, they guide us in predicting future performances.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Your friend is interested in estimating the proportion of people who would vote for his project in a local contest. He selects a large sample among his many friends and claims that, with such a large sample, he does not need to worry about the method of selecting the sample. What is wrong in this reasoning? Explain.

In criminal trials (e.g., murder, robbery, driving while impaired, etc.) in the United States, it must be proven that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This can be thought of as a very strong unwillingness to convict defendants who are actually innocent. In civil trials (e.g., breach of contract, divorce hearings for alimony, etc.), it must only be proven by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant is guilty. This makes it easier to prove a defendant guilty in a civil case than in a murder case. In a high- profile pair of cases in the mid 1990 s, O. J. Simpson was found to be not guilty of murder in a criminal case against him. Shortly thereafter, however, he was found guilty in a civil case and ordered to pay damages to the families of the victims. a. In a criminal trial by jury, suppose the probability the defendant is convicted, given guilt, is \(0.95,\) and the probability the defendant is acquitled, given innocence, is 0.95 . Suppose that \(90 \%\) of all defendants truly are guilty. Given that a defendant is convicted, find the probability he or she was actually innocent. Draw a tree diagram or construct a contingency table to help you answer. b. Repeat part a, but under the assumption that \(50 \%\) of all defendants truly are guilty. c. In a civil trial, suppose the probability the defendant is convicted, given guilt is 0.99 , and the probability the defendant is acquitted, given innocence, is \(0.75 .\) Suppose that \(90 \%\) of all defendants truly are guilty. Given that a defendant is convicted, find the probability he or she was actually innocent. Draw a tree diagram or construct a contingency table to help you answer.

Checking independence In each of three independent visits to a restaurant, you choose randomly between two of today's specials, TS1 and TS2, on tle memu. Let A denote \\{today's special on first visit is TS1\\}, B denote \\{ today's special on second visit is TS1\\}, C denote \\{ today's special on the first two visits are TS1\\}, and D denote \\{today's special on the three visits are TS1\\}. a. Find the probabilities of \(\mathrm{A}, \mathrm{B}, \mathrm{C},\) and \(\mathrm{D}\). b. Which, if any, pairs of these events are independent? Explain.

Every year the insurance industry spends considerable resources assessing risk probabilities. To accumulate a risk of about one in a million of death, you can drive 100 miles, take a cross country plane flight, work as a police officer for 10 hours, work in a coal mine for 12 hours, smoke two cigarettes, be a nonsmoker but live with a smoker for two weeks, or drink 70 pints of beer in a year (Wilson and Crouch, \(2001,\) pp. \(208-209)\). Show that a risk of about one in a million of death is also approximately the probability of flipping 20 heads in a row with a balanced coin.

State an event that has happened to you or to someone you know that seems highly coincidental (such as seeing a friend while on vacation). Explain why that event may not be especially surprising, once you think of all the similar types of events that could have happened to you or someone that you know, over the course of several years.

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.