/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 35 Identifying spam An article \(^{... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91影视

91影视

Log out

Learning Materials

Features

Discover

Chapter 5: Problem 35

Identifying spam An article \(^{4}\) on www.networkworld.com about evaluating e-mail filters that are designed to detect spam described a test of MailFrontier's Anti-Spam Gateway (ASG). In the test, there were 7840 spam messages, of which ASG caught \(7005 .\) Of the 7053 messages that \(\mathrm{ASG}\) identified as spam, they were correct in all but 48 cases. a. Set up a contingency table that cross classifies the actual spam status (with the rows "spam" and "not spam") by the ASG filter prediction (with the columns "predict message is spam" and "predict message is not spam"). Using the information given, enter counts in three of the four cells. b. For this test, given that a message is truly spam, estimate the probability that ASG correctly detects it. c. Given that ASG identifies a message as spam, estimate the probability that the message truly was spam.

Short Answer

Expert verified
Contingency: TP = 7005, FN = 835, FP = 48. Probabilities: a) 0.8931, b) 0.9932.

Step by step solution

01

Set up the Contingency Table

We need to determine the four categories: \( \text{Actual Spams Detected} (True Positives), \text{Actual Spams Missed} (False Negatives), \text{False Spams Identified} (False Positives), \text{Correctly Missed Non-spam} (True Negatives) \). From the problem, the following details are known:- Total messages identified as spam: 7053- Correctly identified spam messages: \( 7005 \)- Wrongly identified spam messages: \( 48 \)- Total actual spam messages: 7840.Therefore:- True Positives (Actual & predicted spam correctly): 7005- False Negatives (Actual spam but not predicted): \( 7840 - 7005 = 835 \)- Predicted spam (sum of correct and incorrect spam predictions): 7053- False positives (incorrect spam identifications): 48We can now summarize as a table: | | Predicted Spam | Predicted Not Spam | Total ||----------------------|----------------|--------------------|-------|| **Actual Spam** | 7005 | 835 | 7840 || **Actual Not Spam** | 48 | | |

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91影视!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Contingency Table
A contingency table in statistics is a powerful tool for visualizing possible relationships between two categorical variables. In the context of evaluating spam filters, a contingency table organizes data from email classifications to help us understand the performance of an anti-spam system.

When setting up a contingency table for spam detection, we categorize emails into four distinct boxes:
  • True Positives (TP): Emails correctly identified as spam.
  • False Negatives (FN): Actual spam emails mistakenly classified as not spam.
  • False Positives (FP): Non-spam emails incorrectly marked as spam.
  • True Negatives (TN): Non-spam emails correctly identified as not spam, which is often inferred if not directly calculated.

This setup allows us to compute various performance metrics such as recall and precision. The intersection of the rows (actual classification) and columns (predicted classification) in the table highlights areas where the classification was accurate or where errors occurred.
True Positives and False Negatives
In the context of spam detection, understanding True Positives and False Negatives is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of a spam filter.

**True Positives (TP)** are emails that are spam and correctly identified as such by the filter. This number is essential for calculating recall, a measure of a filter's ability to identify actual spam messages.

**False Negatives (FN)** are spam messages that are not detected by the filter. These emails manage to slip through, which can be bothersome for users.

Calculating these numbers helps us improve spam filters by showing where the system accurately detects spam and where it fails to. The formula for recall, which is the ability of a filter to identify spam from among all spam, is:\[Recall = \frac{TP}{TP + FN}\]

A high recall indicates a good ability to catch spam at the risk of receiving more false positives. The balance between these metrics is what ultimately leads to a smoother experience.
Probability Estimation
Probability estimation is a vital aspect of analyzing the performance of spam filters. It allows us to calculate the likelihood of certain outcomes given specific conditions. For instance, it answers questions like: "What is the probability that a message flagged as spam is indeed spam?"

**When estimating probabilities**, two classic scenarios arise:
  • Probability Given Spam (Precision): This measures the accuracy of spam flags. The formula is:\[Precision = \frac{TP}{TP + FP}\]
    It indicates the probability that an email classified as spam is actually spam.
  • Probability of True Detection (Recognition): This is akin to calculating recall. It deals with the chance of accurately flagging spam messages.

These probabilities guide users to understand and trust the spam filter's predictions. High precision means fewer false alarms, fostering trust in the spam classification system's reliability. A well-tuned model balances both precision and recall for optimal performance.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

Petra Kvitova serves Petra Kvitova of the Czech Republic won the 2014 Wimbledon Ladies' Singles Championship. In the final game against Eugenie Bouchard of Canada she had 41 first serves, of which 28 were good, and three double faults. a. Find the probability that her first serve is good. b. Find the conditional probability of double faulting, given that her first serve resulted in a fault. c. On what percentage of her service points does she double fault?

The all-time, on-time arrival rate of a certain airline to a specific destination is \(82 \%\). This week, you have booked two flights to this destination with this airline. a. Construct a sample space for the on-time or late arrival of the two flights. b. Find the probability that both the flights arrive on time. c. Find the probability that both the flights are late.

A teacher gives a four-question unannounced true-false pop quiz, with two possible answers to each question. a. Use a tree diagram to show the possible response patterns in terms of whether any given response is correct or incorrect. How many outcomes are in the sample space? b. An unprepared student guesses all the answers randomly. Find the probabilities of the possible outcomes on the tree diagram. c. Refer to part b. Using the tree diagram, evaluate the probability of passing the quiz, which the teacher defines as answering at least three questions correctly.

Explain what is meant by the long-run relative frequency definition of probability.

Discussion with students \(\quad\) In a statistics class of 30 stu- \(-\) dents, 20 students are from the business program and 10 students are from the science program. The instructor randomly select three students, successively and without replacement, to discuss a question. a. True or false: The probability of selecting three students from the business program is \((2 / 3) \times(2 / 3) \times(2 / 3)\). If true, explain why. If false, calculate the correct answer. b. Let \(\mathrm{A}=\) first student is from the business program and \(\mathrm{B}=\) second student is from the business program. Are A and B independent? Explain why or why not. c. Answer parts a and \(b\) if each student is replaced in the class after being selected.
See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

Calculus

Read Explanation

Probability and Statistics

Read Explanation

Discrete Mathematics

Read Explanation

Applied Mathematics

Read Explanation

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Read Explanation

Statistics

Read Explanation
View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.