/*! This file is auto-generated */ .wp-block-button__link{color:#fff;background-color:#32373c;border-radius:9999px;box-shadow:none;text-decoration:none;padding:calc(.667em + 2px) calc(1.333em + 2px);font-size:1.125em}.wp-block-file__button{background:#32373c;color:#fff;text-decoration:none} Problem 30 Audit and low income Table 5.3 o... [FREE SOLUTION] | 91Ó°ÊÓ

91Ó°ÊÓ

Audit and low income Table 5.3 on audit status and income follows. Show how to find the probability of: a. Being audited, given that the taxpayer is in the lowest income category. b. Being in the lowest income category, given that the taxpayer is audited. \begin{tabular}{lcc} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Audited } \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Income & No & Yes \\ \hline\(<\$ 200,000\) & 0.9556 & 0.0085 \\ \(\$ 200,000-\$ 1 \mathrm{mil}\) & 0.0326 & 0.0009 \\ \(>\$ 1 \mathrm{mil}\) & 0.0022 & 0.0003 \\ \hline \end{tabular}

Short Answer

Expert verified
a. 0.0085; b. 0.8763

Step by step solution

01

Understand the Table

The table provides the distribution of audit statuses across different income categories. It displays the proportions of taxpayers across three income ranges and whether they were audited. Each row sums to a total proportion of 1, indicating complete distribution within the category.
02

Identify Required Probabilities

We need to use conditional probability to solve for both parts (a) and (b) of the exercise. This involves using the conditional probability formula: \( P(A|B) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(B)} \).
03

Calculate Probability for Part a

For part (a), we need \( P(\text{audited} | \text{income} < \$200,000) \). This is given directly in the table: 0.0085. So, the probability of being audited given that the taxpayer is in the lowest income category is simply 0.0085.
04

Calculate Total Proportions for Part b

Sum all the audited proportions from each income category to find the total probability of being audited: \(0.0085 + 0.0009 + 0.0003 = 0.0097\).
05

Calculate Probability for Part b

For part (b), determine \( P(\text{income} < \\(200,000 | \text{audited}) \). Using \( P(A|B) = \frac{P(B|A)P(A)}{P(B)} \), where \( P(B|A) \) is the audit probability for the lowest income, \(0.0085\), and the total audited probability is \(0.0097\). We compute: \( P(\text{income} < \\)200,000 | \text{audited}) = \frac{0.0085}{0.0097} = 0.8763\).

Unlock Step-by-Step Solutions & Ace Your Exams!

  • Full Textbook Solutions

    Get detailed explanations and key concepts

  • Unlimited Al creation

    Al flashcards, explanations, exams and more...

  • Ads-free access

    To over 500 millions flashcards

  • Money-back guarantee

    We refund you if you fail your exam.

Over 30 million students worldwide already upgrade their learning with 91Ó°ÊÓ!

Key Concepts

These are the key concepts you need to understand to accurately answer the question.

Probability Theory
The core of this exercise revolves around understanding probability theory, specifically, conditional probability. Probability theory allows us to measure the chance of an event happening. In the context of our problem, it involves determining how likely it is for taxpayers from different income brackets to be audited.Conditional probability helps us answer questions like, "What is the probability of one event occurring given that another event has already occurred?" In our exercise, we used it to analyze audit likelihood based on taxpayer income. The formula for conditional probability is crucial here:\[ P(A|B) = \frac{P(A \cap B)}{P(B)} \]where:
  • \(P(A|B)\) is the probability of event A occurring given that event B has occurred.
  • \(P(A \cap B)\) is the probability of both events A and B occurring.
  • \(P(B)\) is the probability of event B occurring.
Grasping this formula is important because it helps you see the relationship between different events and how they influence one another. This can be applied to numerous real-world problems, especially those involving decision-making under uncertainty.
Income Distribution
Income distribution refers to how income is spread across a specific population. In our exercise, this distribution is shown in three categories: less than $200,000, between $200,000 and $1 million, and more than $1 million. Understanding this division helps us see which income brackets are more prevalent and how audits are correlated with them. In statistics, knowing the distribution is key because it gives insight into the behavior of the dataset. Here, each income category sums to a probability of 1 when considering whether or not an audit occurs, illustrating their complete distribution within their categories. This helps us in calculating the specific probabilities needed for our conditional probability calculations. The spread of income across categories highlights inequality and can indicate which groups might face more intense scrutiny or attention. For instance, in this exercise, auditors might pay more attention to certain groups based on observed data, which could shape policy decisions in taxation or auditing protocols.
Statistical Tables
Statistical tables are a common way to display data in a structured format that makes it easier to understand and analyze. In our exercise, the table provides a snapshot of audit occurrences across different income levels. These tables are often used to organize information in a manner that highlights the relationship between different variables. For example, our table shows the probability of an individual being audited given their income bracket. The rows of the table represent distinct income categories, while the columns represent audit status. Using tables helps simplify complex data and allows for quick comparisons. With a glance, you can identify trends, like how the likelihood of being audited changes as income increases. This practical approach aids in our problem-solving process because it delivers data visually, supporting our calculations in probability theory effectively. Therefore, understanding how to read and interpret these tables is an essential skill in statistics, helping to draw significant conclusions based on organized data.

One App. One Place for Learning.

All the tools & learning materials you need for study success - in one app.

Get started for free

Most popular questions from this chapter

E-Comm, British Columbia's emergency communications center, provides communication services and support systems to two million residents of southwest British Columbia, Canada. On any given day, the probability a randomly selected resident decides to call E-Comm is \(1.37 / 1000\). a. Assuming calls are made independently, find the probability that they all decide to call tomorrow. b. Is the assumption of independence made in part a realistic? Explain.

Revisiting seat belts and auto accidents The following table is from Exercise 5.23 classifying auto accidents by survival status \((\mathrm{S}=\) survived \(, \mathrm{D}=\) died \()\) and seat belt status of the individual involved in the accident. \begin{tabular}{lcrr} \hline & \multicolumn{2}{c} { Outcome } & \\ \cline { 2 - 3 } Belt & S & D & Total \\ \hline Yes & 412,368 & 510 & \(\mathbf{4 1 2 , 8 7 8}\) \\ No & 162,527 & 1,601 & \(\mathbf{1 6 4 , 1 2 8}\) \\ Total & \(\mathbf{5 7 4 , 8 9 5}\) & \(\mathbf{2 , 1 1 1}\) & \(\mathbf{5 7 7 , 0 0 6}\) \\ \hline \end{tabular} a. Estimate the probability that the individual died (D) in the auto accident. b. Estimate the probability that the individual died, given that the person (i) wore and (ii) did not wear a seat belt. Interpret results. c. Are the events of dying and wearing a seat belt independent? Justify your answer.

Every year the insurance industry spends considerable resources assessing risk probabilities. To accumulate a risk of about one in a million of death, you can drive 100 miles, take a cross country plane flight, work as a police officer for 10 hours, work in a coal mine for 12 hours, smoke two cigarettes, be a nonsmoker but live with a smoker for two weeks, or drink 70 pints of beer in a year (Wilson and Crouch, \(2001,\) pp. \(208-209)\). Show that a risk of about one in a million of death is also approximately the probability of flipping 20 heads in a row with a balanced coin.

Discussion with students \(\quad\) In a statistics class of 30 stu- \(-\) dents, 20 students are from the business program and 10 students are from the science program. The instructor randomly select three students, successively and without replacement, to discuss a question. a. True or false: The probability of selecting three students from the business program is \((2 / 3) \times(2 / 3) \times(2 / 3)\). If true, explain why. If false, calculate the correct answer. b. Let \(\mathrm{A}=\) first student is from the business program and \(\mathrm{B}=\) second student is from the business program. Are A and B independent? Explain why or why not. c. Answer parts a and \(b\) if each student is replaced in the class after being selected.

A particular heart disease is said to have a prevalence of \(1 / 1000\) in a specific population. In a sample of 50 people chosen randomly, what is the probability that at least two people have this disease?

See all solutions

Recommended explanations on Math Textbooks

View all explanations

What do you think about this solution?

We value your feedback to improve our textbook solutions.

Study anywhere. Anytime. Across all devices.